Literature DB >> 20487122

Long-term mechanical consequences of permanent right ventricular pacing: effect of pacing site.

Darryl P Leong1, Anne-Marie Mitchell, Ingrid Salna, Anthony G Brooks, Gautam Sharma, Han S Lim, Muayad Alasady, Malcolm Barlow, James Leitch, Prashanthan Sanders, Glenn D Young.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Long-term right ventricular apical (RVA) pacing has been associated with adverse effects on left ventricular systolic function; however, the comparative effects of right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) pacing are unknown. Our aim was therefore to examine the long-term effects of septal RVOT versus RVA pacing on left ventricular and atrial structure and function.
METHODS: Fifty-eight patients who were prospectively randomized to long-term pacing either from the right ventricular apex or RVOT septum were studied echocardiographically. Left ventricular (LV) and atrial (LA) volumes were measured. LV 2D strain and tissue velocity images were analyzed to measure 18-segment time-to-peak longitudinal systolic strain and 12-segment time-to-peak systolic tissue velocity. Intra-LV synchrony was assessed by their respective standard deviations. Interventricular mechanical delay was measured as the difference in time-to-onset of systolic flow in the RVOT and LV outflow tract. Septal A' was measured using tissue velocity images.
RESULTS: Following 29 ± 10 months pacing, there was a significant difference in LV ejection fraction (P < 0.001), LV end-systolic volume (P = 0.007), and LA volume (P = 0.02) favoring the RVOT-paced group over the RVA-paced patients. RVA-pacing was associated with greater interventricular mechanical dyssynchrony and intra-LV dyssynchrony than RVOT-pacing. Septal A' was adversely affected by intra-LV dyssynchrony (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Long-term RVOT-pacing was associated with superior indices of LV structure and function compared with RVA-pacing, and was associated with less adverse LA remodeling. If pacing cannot be avoided, the RVOT septum may be the preferred site for right ventricular pacing.
© 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20487122     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2010.01804.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1045-3873


  13 in total

Review 1.  Right ventricular pacing, mechanical dyssynchrony, and heart failure.

Authors:  Alan J Bank; Ryan M Gage; Kevin V Burns
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 2.  The importance of avoiding unnecessary right ventricular pacing in clinical practice.

Authors:  Finn Akerström; Miguel A Arias; Marta Pachón; Jesús Jiménez-López; Alberto Puchol; Justo Juliá-Calvo
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2013-11-26

3.  Paced QRS axis as a predictor of pacing-induced left ventricular dysfunction.

Authors:  Sung-Hwan Kim; Yong-Seog Oh; Gi-Byoung Nam; Kee-Joon Choi; Jae Seok Park; Sang Weon Park; Seung-Jung Park; Young Keun On; June Soo Kim; Woo-Seung Shin; Ji-Hoon Kim; Sung-Won Jang; Man Young Lee; You-Ho Kim; Tai-Ho Rho
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2014-11-08       Impact factor: 1.900

4.  Honing in on optimal ventricular pacing sites: an argument for his bundle pacing.

Authors:  Mark Young Lee; Srinath Chilakamarri Yeshwant; Daniel Lawrence Lustgarten
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2015-04

5.  Is right ventricular mid-septal pacing superior to apical pacing in patients with high degree atrio-ventricular block and moderately depressed left ventricular function?

Authors:  Kang Chen; Ye Mao; Shao-hua Liu; Qiong Wu; Qing-zhi Luo; Wen-qi Pan; Qi Jin; Ning Zhang; Tian-you Ling; Ying Chen; Gang Gu; Wei-feng Shen; Li-qun Wu
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.066

Review 6.  Atrial fibrillation and heart failure in the elderly.

Authors:  Pedram Kazemian; Gavin Oudit; Bodh I Jugdutt
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 4.214

7.  Electrocardiographic predictors of validated right ventricular outflow tract septal pacing for correct localization of transthoracic echocardiography.

Authors:  Huiqiang Wei; Jiaojiao Tang; Dongli Chen; Qianhuan Zhang; Yuanhong Liang; Lie Liu; Shulin Wu; Chunying Lin; Zhiming Yang; Chanjuan Chai
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2018-03-25       Impact factor: 2.882

8.  Current concepts in pacing 2010-2011: the right and wrong way to pace.

Authors:  Simon Modi; Andrew Krahn; Raymond Yee
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2011-10

9.  Right ventricular outflow tract septal pacing is superior to right ventricular apical pacing.

Authors:  Cao Zou; Jianping Song; Hui Li; Xingmei Huang; Yuping Liu; Caiming Zhao; Xin Shi; Xiangjun Yang
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2015-04-20       Impact factor: 5.501

10.  Short-term and intermediate-term performance and safety of left bundle branch pacing.

Authors:  Jincun Guo; Linlin Li; Fanqi Meng; Maolong Su; Xinyi Huang; Simei Chen; Qiang Li; Dong Chang; Binni Cai
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2020-04-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.