Literature DB >> 11992863

Chemoreduction plus focal therapy for retinoblastoma: factors predictive of need for treatment with external beam radiotherapy or enucleation.

Carol L Shields1, Santosh G Honavar, Anna T Meadows, Jerry A Shields, Hakan Demirci, Arun Singh, Debra L Friedman, Thomas John Naduvilath.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To report the results of chemoreduction and focal therapy for retinoblastoma with determination of factors predictive of the need for treatment with external beam radiotherapy or enucleation.
DESIGN: Interventional case series.
METHODS: One-hundred three patients with retinoblastoma (158 eyes with 364 tumors) at the Ocular Oncology Service at Wills Eye Hospital of Thomas Jefferson University in conjunction with the Division of Oncology at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia from June 1994 to August 1999 were enrolled for this prospective clinical trial. The patients received treatment for retinoblastoma with six planned cycles (one cycle per month) of chemoreduction using vincristine, etoposide, and carboplatin combined with focal treatments (cryotherapy, thermotherapy, or plaque radiotherapy). The two main outcome measures after chemoreduction and focal therapy were the need for external beam radiotherapy and the need for enucleation. The clinical features at the time of patient presentation were analyzed for impact on the main outcome measures using a series of Cox proportional hazards regressions.
RESULTS: Using Reese-Ellsworth (RE) staging for retinoblastoma, there were nine (6%) eyes with group I disease, 26 (16%) eyes with group II disease, 16 (10%) eyes with group III disease, 32 (20%) eyes with group IV disease, and 75 (48%) eyes with group V retinoblastoma. All eyes showed initial favorable response with tumor regression. The median follow-up was 28 months (range, 2-63 months). Failure of chemoreduction and need for treatment with external beam radiotherapy occurred in 25% of eyes at 1 year, 27% at 3 years, and no further increase at 5 years. More specifically, external beam radiotherapy was necessary at 5 years in 10% of RE groups I-IV eyes and 47% of RE group V eyes. Multivariate factors predictive of treatment with external beam radiotherapy included non-Caucasian race, male sex, and RE group V disease. Failure of chemoreduction and the need for treatment with enucleation occurred in 13% eyes at 1 year, 29% at 3 years, and 34% at 5 years. More specifically, enucleation was necessary in 15% of RE groups I-IV eyes at 5 years and in 53% of RE group V at 5 years. Multivariate factors predictive of treatment with enucleation included patient age older than 12 months, single tumor in eye, and tumor proximity to foveola within 2 mm. Overall, of the 158 eyes, 50% required external beam radiotherapy or enucleation and 50% were successfully managed without these treatments. No patient developed retinoblastoma metastasis, pinealoblastoma, or second malignant neoplasms over the 5-year follow up.
CONCLUSIONS: Chemoreduction offers satisfactory retinoblastoma control for RE groups I-IV eyes, with treatment failure necessitating additional external beam radiotherapy in only 10% of eyes and enucleation in 15% of eyes at 5-year follow-up. Patients with RE group V eyes require external beam radiotherapy in 47% and enucleation in 53% at 5 years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11992863     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9394(02)01348-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0002-9394            Impact factor:   5.258


  49 in total

Review 1.  Update on retinoblastoma.

Authors:  Constantino Sábado Alvarez; Ana Sastre Urgellés; José Manuel Abelairas Gómez
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.405

2.  Retinoblastoma. Fifty years of progress. The LXXI Edward Jackson Memorial Lecture.

Authors:  Hans E Grossniklaus
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 5.258

3.  Second nonocular tumors among survivors of retinoblastoma treated with contemporary photon and proton radiotherapy.

Authors:  Roshan V Sethi; Helen A Shih; Beow Y Yeap; Kent W Mouw; Robert Petersen; David Y Kim; John E Munzenrider; Eric Grabowski; Carlos Rodriguez-Galindo; Torunn I Yock; Nancy J Tarbell; Karen J Marcus; Shizuo Mukai; Shannon M MacDonald
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Selective ophthalmic arterial injection of melphalan for intraocular retinoblastoma: a 4-year review.

Authors:  Sherine Jue Ong; An-Ning Chao; Ho-Fai Wong; Kuan-Lyin Liou; Ling-Yuh Kao
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 2.447

5.  Intra-arterial chemotherapy as a treatment for intraocular retinoblastoma: alternatives to direct ophthalmic artery catheterization.

Authors:  M A Klufas; Y P Gobin; B Marr; S E Brodie; I J Dunkel; D H Abramson
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Loss of fundus view as an indication for secondary enucleation in retinoblastoma.

Authors:  Jesse L Berry; Kaitlin Kogachi; Rima Jubran; Jonathan W Kim
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 3.167

7.  Distinct Gene Expression Profiles Define Anaplastic Grade in Retinoblastoma.

Authors:  Lauren E Hudson; Pia Mendoza; William H Hudson; Alison Ziesel; G Baker Hubbard; Jill Wells; Bhakti Dwivedi; Jeanne Kowalski; Sandra Seby; Viren Patel; Eldon Geisert; Charles Specht; Hans E Grossniklaus
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2018-07-21       Impact factor: 4.307

8.  Chemoreduction for retinoblastoma: analysis of tumor control and risks for recurrence in 457 tumors.

Authors:  Carol L Shields; Arman Mashayekhi; Jacqueline Cater; Abdallah Shelil; Anna T Meadows; Jerry A Shields
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2004

9.  Folic acid transport via high affinity carrier-mediated system in human retinoblastoma cells.

Authors:  Viral Kansara; Durga Paturi; Shuanghui Luo; Ripal Gaudana; Ashim K Mitra
Journal:  Int J Pharm       Date:  2007-12-23       Impact factor: 5.875

10.  Irresponsiveness of two retinoblastoma cases to conservative therapy correlates with up- regulation of hERG1 channels and of the VEGF-A pathway.

Authors:  Pina Fortunato; Serena Pillozzi; Angela Tamburini; Liliana Pollazzi; Alessandro Franchi; Agostino La Torre; Annarosa Arcangeli
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.