BACKGROUND/AIMS: The aim of this study was to examine the reproducibility of methane and hydrogen in exhaled air breath after a per-oral load of lactulose. METHODS: Methane was present in the exhaled breath of 21 of 50 healthy subjects recruited by advertisement. Three methane breath tests were performed in 12 women (aged 23.6+/-0.5 years, mean+/-SEM) after they consumed 10 g of lactulose dissolved in 300 ml of water. Short- and medium-term reproducibilities were assessed by paired examinations taken 3 and 17 days (median) apart, respectively. RESULTS: High values of coefficients of variation for paired examinations (CV(p)) indicated a poor short-term reproducibility of parameters characterizing either the methane or hydrogen excretion in breath air: CV(p) values of the maximum net increments over baseline in methane (max CH(4_net)), and in hydrogen (max H(2_net)), were 34% and 41%, respectively. Moreover, the reproducibility consistently deteriorated with increasing time gap between repeat measurements (CV(p): 60% for max CH(4_net) and 64% for max H(2_net)). CONCLUSIONS: The low reproducibility of parameters characterizing quantitative methane breath excretion suggests that caution is necessary when judging the clinical usefulness of the methane breath test after a per-oral lactulose load for the purpose of diagnosing and classifying functional bowel disorders.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: The aim of this study was to examine the reproducibility of methane and hydrogen in exhaled air breath after a per-oral load of lactulose. METHODS:Methane was present in the exhaled breath of 21 of 50 healthy subjects recruited by advertisement. Three methane breath tests were performed in 12 women (aged 23.6+/-0.5 years, mean+/-SEM) after they consumed 10 g of lactulose dissolved in 300 ml of water. Short- and medium-term reproducibilities were assessed by paired examinations taken 3 and 17 days (median) apart, respectively. RESULTS: High values of coefficients of variation for paired examinations (CV(p)) indicated a poor short-term reproducibility of parameters characterizing either the methane or hydrogen excretion in breath air: CV(p) values of the maximum net increments over baseline in methane (max CH(4_net)), and in hydrogen (max H(2_net)), were 34% and 41%, respectively. Moreover, the reproducibility consistently deteriorated with increasing time gap between repeat measurements (CV(p): 60% for max CH(4_net) and 64% for max H(2_net)). CONCLUSIONS: The low reproducibility of parameters characterizing quantitative methanebreath excretion suggests that caution is necessary when judging the clinical usefulness of the methane breath test after a per-oral lactulose load for the purpose of diagnosing and classifying functional bowel disorders.
Authors: Chu K Yao; Caroline J Tuck; Jacqueline S Barrett; Kim Ek Canale; Hamish L Philpott; Peter R Gibson Journal: United European Gastroenterol J Date: 2016-07-07 Impact factor: 4.623
Authors: Anna Kasicka-Jonderko; Anna Nita; Krzysztof Jonderko; Magdalena Kamińska; Barbara Błońska-Fajfrowska Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2011-12-07 Impact factor: 5.742