Literature DB >> 20483821

Generalization of affective learning about faces to perceptually similar faces.

Sara C Verosky1, Alexander Todorov.   

Abstract

Different individuals have different (and different-looking) significant others, friends, and foes. The objective of this study was to investigate whether these social face environments can shape individual face preferences. First, participants learned to associate faces with positive, neutral, or negative behaviors. Then, they evaluated morphs combining novel faces with the learned faces. The morphs (65% and 80% novel faces) were within the categorical boundary of the novel faces: They were perceived as those faces in a preliminary study. Moreover, a second preliminary study showed that following the learning, the morphs' categorization as similar to the learned faces was indistinguishable from the categorization of actual novel faces. Nevertheless, in the main experiment, participants evaluated morphs of "positive" faces more positively than morphs of "negative" faces. This learning generalization effect increased as a function of the similarity of the novel faces to the learned faces. The findings suggest that general learning mechanisms based on similarity can account for idiosyncratic face preferences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20483821     DOI: 10.1177/0956797610371965

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  19 in total

1.  Influences of appearance-behaviour congruity on memory and social judgements.

Authors:  Brittany S Cassidy; Angela H Gutchess
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2014-09-02

2.  The neural dynamics of updating person impressions.

Authors:  Peter Mende-Siedlecki; Yang Cai; Alexander Todorov
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  Pain and satisfaction: healthcare providers' facial appearance matters.

Authors:  Katia Mattarozzi; Elisa Caponera; Paolo Maria Russo; Valentina Colonnello; Margherita Bassetti; Elena Farolfi; Alexander Todorov
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2020-04-07

4.  Individual Aesthetic Preferences for Faces Are Shaped Mostly by Environments, Not Genes.

Authors:  Laura Germine; Richard Russell; P Matthew Bronstad; Gabriëlla A M Blokland; Jordan W Smoller; Holum Kwok; Samuel E Anthony; Ken Nakayama; Gillian Rhodes; Jeremy B Wilmer
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Survival of the salient: Aversive learning rescues otherwise forgettable memories via neural reactivation and post-encoding hippocampal connectivity.

Authors:  David Clewett; Joseph Dunsmoor; Shelby L Bachman; Elizabeth A Phelps; Lila Davachi
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2021-12-03       Impact factor: 2.877

6.  Judged and Remembered Trustworthiness of Faces Is Enhanced by Experiencing Multisensory Synchrony and Asynchrony in the Right Order.

Authors:  Hugo Toscano; Thomas W Schubert
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Can singular examples change implicit attitudes in the real-world?

Authors:  Leslie E Roos; Sophie Lebrecht; James W Tanaka; Michael J Tarr
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-09-05

8.  Young children learn first impressions of faces through social referencing.

Authors:  Adam Eggleston; Elena Geangu; Steven P Tipper; Richard Cook; Harriet Over
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Behavioral evidence for differences in social and non-social category learning.

Authors:  Lucile Gamond; Catherine Tallon-Baudry; Nicolas Guyon; Jean-Didier Lemaréchal; Laurent Hugueville; Nathalie George
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-08-15

10.  Is beauty in the face of the beholder?

Authors:  Bruno Laeng; Oddrun Vermeer; Unni Sulutvedt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.