Literature DB >> 34871800

Survival of the salient: Aversive learning rescues otherwise forgettable memories via neural reactivation and post-encoding hippocampal connectivity.

David Clewett1, Joseph Dunsmoor2, Shelby L Bachman3, Elizabeth A Phelps4, Lila Davachi5.   

Abstract

The effects of aversive events on memory are complex and go beyond the simple enhancement of threatening information. Negative experiences can also rescue related but otherwise forgettable details encoded close in time. Here, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in healthy young adults to examine the brain mechanisms that support this retrograde memory effect. In a two-phase incidental encoding paradigm, participants viewed different pictures of tools and animals before and during Pavlovian fear conditioning. During Phase 1, these images were intermixed with neutral scenes, which provided a unique 'context tag' for this specific phase of encoding. A few minutes later, during Phase 2, new pictures from one category were paired with a mild shock (threat-conditioned stimulus; CS+), while pictures from the other category were not shocked. FMRI analyses revealed that, across-participants, individuals who showed aversive learning-related retroactive memory benefits for Phase 1 CS+ items were also more likely to exhibit three brain effects: first, greater spontaneous reinstatement of the Phase 1 context when participants viewed conceptually-related CS+ items in Phase 2; second, greater successful encoding-related VTA/SN and LC activation for Phase 2 CS+ items; and third, learning-dependent increases in post-encoding hippocampal functional coupling with CS+ category-selective cortex. These biases in hippocampal-cortical connectivity also mediated the relationship between VTA/SN aversive encoding effects and across-participant variability in the retroactive memory benefit. Collectively, our findings suggest that both online and offline brain mechanisms may enable threatening events to preserve memories that acquire new significance in the future.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aversive; Consolidation; Dopamine; Hippocampus; Memory; Reactivation

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34871800      PMCID: PMC8755594          DOI: 10.1016/j.nlm.2021.107572

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem        ISSN: 1074-7427            Impact factor:   2.877


  60 in total

1.  Measuring functional connectivity during distinct stages of a cognitive task.

Authors:  Jesse Rissman; Adam Gazzaley; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  The scanner as a stressor: evidence from subjective and neuroendocrine stress parameters in the time course of a functional magnetic resonance imaging session.

Authors:  Markus Muehlhan; Ulrike Lueken; Hans-Ulrich Wittchen; Clemens Kirschbaum
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2010-09-25       Impact factor: 2.997

Review 3.  The effects of post-encoding stress and glucocorticoids on episodic memory in humans and rodents.

Authors:  Matthew A Sazma; Grant S Shields; Andrew P Yonelinas
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 2.310

4.  Persistence of Amygdala-Hippocampal Connectivity and Multi-Voxel Correlation Structures During Awake Rest After Fear Learning Predicts Long-Term Expression of Fear.

Authors:  Erno J Hermans; Jonathan W Kanen; Arielle Tambini; Guillén Fernández; Lila Davachi; Elizabeth A Phelps
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 5.  Awake Reactivation of Prior Experiences Consolidates Memories and Biases Cognition.

Authors:  Arielle Tambini; Lila Davachi
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 6.  The hippocampal-VTA loop: controlling the entry of information into long-term memory.

Authors:  John E Lisman; Anthony A Grace
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2005-06-02       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  Competition between engrams influences fear memory formation and recall.

Authors:  Asim J Rashid; Chen Yan; Valentina Mercaldo; Hwa-Lin Liz Hsiang; Sungmo Park; Christina J Cole; Antonietta De Cristofaro; Julia Yu; Charu Ramakrishnan; Soo Yeun Lee; Karl Deisseroth; Paul W Frankland; Sheena A Josselyn
Journal:  Science       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  In vivo mapping of the human locus coeruleus.

Authors:  Noam I Keren; Carl T Lozar; Kelly C Harris; Paul S Morgan; Mark A Eckert
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Relevance of synaptic tagging and capture to the persistence of long-term potentiation and everyday spatial memory.

Authors:  Szu-Han Wang; Roger L Redondo; Richard G M Morris
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Retroactive and graded prioritization of memory by reward.

Authors:  Erin Kendall Braun; G Elliott Wimmer; Daphna Shohamy
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Tag and capture: how salient experiences target and rescue nearby events in memory.

Authors:  Joseph E Dunsmoor; Vishnu P Murty; David Clewett; Elizabeth A Phelps; Lila Davachi
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 24.482

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.