Literature DB >> 20482359

Cervical vertebra morphology in different skeletal classes. A three-dimensional computed tomography evaluation.

Miyuki Watanabe1, Tetsutaro Yamaguchi, Koutaro Maki.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe cervical vertebra morphology in subjects with different anteroposterior jaw relationships.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cone-beam computed tomography images of 31 female subjects aged 19 to 41 years were evaluated. Subjects constituted two groups according to the ANB angle: group 1, skeletal Class II (ANB angle >5); and group 2, skeletal Class III (ANB angle <1). Nine linear measurements and one angular measurement were used to assess the vertebral morphology. The Mann-Whitney U-test was used for statistical analysis.
RESULTS: The mean atlas dorsal arch height was significantly shorter in Class II subjects compared with those in Class III (P < .05). The cervical vertebra morphological analysis by cone-beam computed tomography was of comparable precision to three-dimensional computed tomography evaluations. This study confirmed previous findings that Class II subjects have significantly lower atlas dorsal arch heights.
CONCLUSION: The height of the atlas dorsal arch of cervical vertebrae is affected by the anteroposterior skeletal pattern.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20482359      PMCID: PMC8966444          DOI: 10.2319/100609-557.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  36 in total

1.  The normal cervical lordosis.

Authors:  A G BORDEN; A M RECHTMAN; J GERSHON-COHEN
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1960-05       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Diagnosis goes digital.

Authors:  David C Hatcher; Cameron L Aboudara
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.650

3.  Three-dimensional cone beam computerized tomography in orthodontics.

Authors:  C H Kau; S Richmond; J M Palomo; M G Hans
Journal:  J Orthod       Date:  2005-12

4.  Accuracy of cone beam computed tomography for periodontal defect measurements.

Authors:  Kelly A Misch; Erica S Yi; David P Sarment
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 6.993

5.  Dosimetry of 3 CBCT devices for oral and maxillofacial radiology: CB Mercuray, NewTom 3G and i-CAT.

Authors:  J B Ludlow; L E Davies-Ludlow; S L Brooks; W B Howerton
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.419

6.  Head posture and craniofacial morphology.

Authors:  B Solow; A Tallgren
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  1976-05       Impact factor: 2.868

7.  Intersex differences in craniocervical morphology and posture in southern Chinese and British Caucasians.

Authors:  M S Cooke; S H Wei
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 2.868

8.  Head posture and dentofacial proportions.

Authors:  M R Marcotte
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 2.079

9.  Radiographic standing cervical segmental alignment in adult volunteers without neck symptoms.

Authors:  J W Hardacker; R F Shuford; P N Capicotto; P W Pryor
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-07-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Relationship between forward head posture and diagnosed internal derangement of the temporomandibular joint.

Authors:  J Hackney; D Bade; A Clawson
Journal:  J Orofac Pain       Date:  1993
View more
  5 in total

1.  Cervical vertebrae maturation index estimates on cone beam CT: 3D reconstructions vs sagittal sections.

Authors:  Marco A E Bonfim; André L F Costa; Acácio Fuziy; Michel E L Ximenez; Flávio A Cotrim-Ferreira; Rívea I Ferreira-Santos
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Individual dental and skeletal age assessment according to Demirjian and Baccetti: Updated norm values for Central-European patients.

Authors:  Eva Paddenberg; Adrian Dees; Peter Proff; Christian Kirschneck
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2022-10-14       Impact factor: 2.341

3.  A study of cervical vertebra anomalies among individuals with different sagittal and vertical facial growth patterns.

Authors:  Venkatachalapathy Anusuya; Jitendra Sharan; Ashok Kumar Jena
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2020-06-05

4.  Morphological comparison of cervical vertebrae in adult females with different sagittal craniofacial patterns: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Özer Alkan; Cihan Aydoğan; Sevil Akkaya
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep

5.  Relationship between Cervical Spine and Skeletal Class II in Subjects with and without Temporomandibular Disorders.

Authors:  Paola Di Giacomo; Valeria Ferrara; Ettore Accivile; Giacomo Ferrato; Antonella Polimeni; Carlo Di Paolo
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 3.037

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.