Literature DB >> 20479650

Reproducibility, accuracy, and predictors of accuracy for the detection of coronary atherosclerotic plaque composition by computed tomography: an ex vivo comparison to intravascular ultrasound.

Alina G van der Giessen1, Michael H Toepker, Patrick M Donelly, Fabian Bamberg, Christopher L Schlett, Christopher Raffle, Thomas Irlbeck, Hang Lee, Theo van Walsum, Pal Maurovich-Horvat, Frank J H Gijsen, Jolanda J Wentzel, Udo Hoffmann.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the reproducibility, accuracy, and predictors of accuracy of computed tomography (CT) angiography to detect and characterize coronary atherosclerotic plaque as compared with intravascular ultrasound.
METHODS: Ten ex vivo human coronary arteries were imaged in a moving phantom by dual-source CT (collimation: 0.6 mm, reconstructed slice thickness: 0.4 mm) and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). Coregistered cross-sections were assessed at 0.4 mm intervals for the presence and composition of atherosclerotic plaque (noncalcified, mixed, and calcified) on CT and IVUS by independent readers to determine reader agreement and diagnostic accuracy. Quantitative measurements of lumen and plaque area, plaque eccentricity, and intimal thickness on IVUS were used to determine predictors for the detection of noncalcified plaque by CT.
RESULTS: Within 1002 coregistered cross-sections, the interobserver agreement to detect plaque on CT was K = 0.48, K = 0.42, and K = 1.00 for noncalcified, mixed, and calcified plaque; respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of CT was 57% out of 84% for noncalcified, 32% of 92% for mixed, and 56% of 93% for calcified plaque when compared with IVUS; respectively. Misclassification occurred in 68% of mixed and 43% of noncalcified plaques. The odds of detecting noncalcified plaque in CT independently increased by 56% (95% CI: 47%-77%, P < 0.0001) with every 0.1 mm increase in maximum intimal thickness as measured by IVUS. Detection rate for noncalcified plaques was poor for plaques <1 mm (36%) but excellent for plaques >1 mm maximal intimal thickness (90%).
CONCLUSION: Reader agreement and diagnostic accuracy for the detection of coronary atherosclerotic plaque vary with plaque composition. Intimal thickness independently predicts detection of noncalcified plaque by CT with excellent sensitivity for >1 mm thick plaques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20479650     DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181e0a541

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Radiol        ISSN: 0020-9996            Impact factor:   6.016


  23 in total

1.  Interobserver agreement for the detection of atherosclerotic plaque in coronary CT angiography: comparison of two low-dose image acquisition protocols with standard retrospectively ECG-gated reconstruction.

Authors:  Annika Schuhbäck; Mohamed Marwan; Sören Gauss; Gerd Muschiol; Dieter Ropers; Christian Schneider; Michael Lell; Johannes Rixe; Christian Hamm; Werner G Daniel; Stephan Achenbach
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Variability and accuracy of coronary CT angiography including use of iterative reconstruction algorithms for plaque burden assessment as compared with intravascular ultrasound-an ex vivo study.

Authors:  Paul Stolzmann; Christopher L Schlett; Pal Maurovich-Horvat; Akiko Maehara; Shixin Ma; Hans Scheffel; Leif-Christopher Engel; Mihály Károlyi; Gary S Mintz; Udo Hoffmann
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Optimal boundary detection method and window settings for coronary atherosclerotic plaque volume analysis in coronary computed tomography angiography: comparison with intravascular ultrasound.

Authors:  Ran Heo; Hyung-Bok Park; Byoung Kwon Lee; Sanghoon Shin; Reza Arsanjani; James K Min; Hyuk-Jae Chang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Emerging Role of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography in Lipid-Lowering Therapy: a Bridge to Image-Guided Personalized Medicine.

Authors:  Toru Miyoshi; Kazuhiro Osawa; Keishi Ichikawa; Kazuki Suruga; Takashi Miki; Masashi Yoshida; Koji Nakagawa; Hironobu Toda; Kazufumi Nakamura; Hiroshi Morita; Hiroshi Ito
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 5.  Noninvasive Imaging of Atherosclerotic Plaque Progression: Status of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography.

Authors:  Veit Sandfort; Joao A C Lima; David A Bluemke
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 7.792

Review 6.  Comprehensive plaque assessment by coronary CT angiography.

Authors:  Pál Maurovich-Horvat; Maros Ferencik; Szilard Voros; Béla Merkely; Udo Hoffmann
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 32.419

7.  Improved non-calcified plaque delineation on coronary CT angiography by sonogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction with different filter strength and relationship with BMI.

Authors:  Lei Zhao; Fabian Plank; Moritz Kummann; Philipp Burghard; Andrea Klauser; Wolfgang Dichtl; Gudrun Feuchtner
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2015-04

Review 8.  Cardiac CT Imaging of Plaque Vulnerability: Hype or Hope?

Authors:  Martin J Willemink; Tim Leiner; Pál Maurovich-Horvat
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 9.  Coronary CT Angiography in the Emergency Department: Current Status.

Authors:  Kavitha M Chinnaiyan; Gilbert L Raff
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2016-10

10.  Standardized volumetric plaque quantification and characterization from coronary CT angiography: a head-to-head comparison with invasive intravascular ultrasound.

Authors:  Hidenari Matsumoto; Satoshi Watanabe; Eisho Kyo; Takafumi Tsuji; Yosuke Ando; Yuka Otaki; Sebastien Cadet; Heidi Gransar; Daniel S Berman; Piotr Slomka; Balaji K Tamarappoo; Damini Dey
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-04-26       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.