Literature DB >> 20478596

Surgical margin status after robot assisted radical cystectomy: results from the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium.

Nicholas J Hellenthal1, Abid Hussain, Paul E Andrews, Paul Carpentier, Erik Castle, Prokar Dasgupta, Jihad Kaouk, Shamim Khan, Adam Kibel, Hyung Kim, Murugesan Manoharan, Mani Menon, Alex Mottrie, David Ornstein, Joan Palou, James Peabody, Raj Pruthi, Lee Richstone, Francis Schanne, Hans Stricker, Raju Thomas, Peter Wiklund, Greg Wilding, Khurshid A Guru.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Positive surgical margins at radical cystectomy confer a poor prognosis. We evaluated the incidence and predictors of positive surgical margins in patients who underwent robot assisted radical cystectomy for bladder cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium database we identified 513 patients who underwent robot assisted radical cystectomy, as done by a total of 22 surgeons at 15 institutions from 2003 to 2009. After stratification by age group, gender, pathological T stage, nodal status, sequential case number and institutional volume logistic regression was used to correlate variables with the likelihood of a positive surgical margin.
RESULTS: Of the 513 patients 35 (6.8%) had a positive surgical margin. Increasing 10-year age group, lymph node positivity and higher pathological T stage were significantly associated with an increased likelihood of a positive margin (p = 0.010, <0.001 and p <0.001, respectively). Gender, sequential case number and institutional volume were not significantly associated with margin positivity. The rate of margin positive disease at cystectomy was 1.5% for pT2 or less, 8.8% for pT3 and 39% for pT4 disease.
CONCLUSIONS: Positive surgical margin rates at robot assisted radical cystectomy for advanced bladder cancer were similar to those in open cystectomy series in a large, multi-institutional, prospective cohort. Sequential case number, a surrogate for the learning curve and institutional volume were not significantly associated with positive margins at robot assisted radical cystectomy. Copyright (c) 2010 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20478596     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.03.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  26 in total

Review 1.  Current management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  G Sancho; P Maroto; J Palou
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.405

2.  [Radical cystectomy - pro robotic].

Authors:  J Kamradt; M Saar; C Ohlmann; S Siemer; M Stöckle
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  Surgery. Outcomes of robot-assisted radical cystectomy: learning curves, margins and lymph node yield.

Authors:  Nick Groves-Kirkby
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 4.  Current status and outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy and urinary diversion.

Authors:  Kyle A Richards; Ashok K Hemal
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.092

5.  Status of Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy (RARC) in 2012.

Authors:  Amrith R Rao; Andrew P Stegemann; Shabnam Rehman; Michael A Poch; Dawn Green; Khurshid A Guru
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-02-16

6.  The emergence of surgeon-controlled robotic surgery in urologic oncology.

Authors:  Timil H Patel; Paurush Babbar; Ashok K Hemal
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-12-07

Review 7.  Current status of robot-assisted radical cystectomy for bladder cancer.

Authors:  Faris Azzouni
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 14.432

8.  Surgical control and margin status after robotic and open cystectomy in high-risk cases: Caution or equivalence?

Authors:  Pranav Sharma; Kamran Zargar-Shoshtari; Michael A Poch; Julio M Pow-Sang; Wade J Sexton; Philippe E Spiess; Scott M Gilbert
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Robot-assisted Versus Open Radical Cystectomy in Patients Receiving Perioperative Chemotherapy for Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: The Oncologist's Perspective from a Multicentre Study.

Authors:  Andrea Necchi; Gregory R Pond; Marc C Smaldone; Sumanta K Pal; Kevin Chan; Yu-Ning Wong; Rosalia Viterbo; Guru Sonpavde; Lauren C Harshman; Simon Crabb; Ajjai Alva; Simon Chowdhury; Ugo De Giorgi; Sandy Srinivas; Neeraj Agarwal; Aristotelis Bamias; Jack Baniel; Ali-Reza Golshayan; Sylvain Ladoire; Cora N Sternberg; Linda Cerbone; Evan Y Yu; Joaquim Bellmunt; Ulka Vaishampayan; Gunter Niegisch; Syed Hussain; Daniel W Bowles; Rafael Morales-Barrera; Matthew I Milowsky; Christine Theodore; Dominik R Berthold; Srikala S Sridhar; Thomas Powles; Jonathan E Rosenberg; Matthew D Galsky
Journal:  Eur Urol Focus       Date:  2017-03-31

10.  Oncologic outcomes between open and robotic-assisted radical cystectomy: a propensity score matched analysis.

Authors:  Michael Ahdoot; Leanne Almario; Hiwot Araya; Jonas Busch; Simon Conti; Mark L Gonzalgo
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.