Literature DB >> 20478396

Phenotyping for DNA repair capacity.

Ilse Decordier1, Kim Vande Loock, Micheline Kirsch-Volders.   

Abstract

The ability to repair DNA damage is strongly associated with the risk of cancer and other human diseases as it is essential for maintenance of genome stability. Moreover, DNA repair capacity is an important factor contributing to the inter-individual variability in mutagen exposure, cancer development and treatment through an individualized adjusted therapy. In addition to genotypes, functional phenotypic assays which integrate the different pathways provide useful tools to explore the role of DNA repair in cancer susceptibility. This review compares the presently available cellular DNA repair phenotype assays based on their characteristics, and discusses their advantages and limitations. Assays for assessment of DNA repair phenotype should be well characterized in terms of reliability, validity, sensitivity, inter- and intra-individual variability, and cancer predictivity. Our comparison reveals that the G₁ and G₂ challenge assays, although labour-intensive, can be considered as very useful assays to investigate DNA repair phenotype. They have been successfully applied to investigate repair capacity of both cancer patients and environmentally exposed populations, and can detect deficiencies in different repair pathways. Moreover, these assays allow to predict the cancer therapy responses and to investigate the cancer prognosis. Nevertheless, the choice of the assay depends on the scientific question addressed and on the objective of its application and more prospective studies are needed since the phenotype could reflect the pathophysiological alterations in the patient secondary to the disease.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20478396     DOI: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2010.05.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  18 in total

1.  STrengthening the reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology-Molecular Epidemiology (STROBE-ME): an extension of the STROBE statement.

Authors:  Valentina Gallo; Matthias Egger; Valerie McCormack; Peter B Farmer; John P A Ioannidis; Micheline Kirsch-Volders; Giuseppe Matullo; David H Phillips; Bernadette Schoket; Ulf Stromberg; Roel Vermeulen; Christopher Wild; Miquel Porta; Paolo Vineis
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2011-10-29       Impact factor: 8.082

2.  Association between PARP-1 V762A polymorphism and cancer susceptibility: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hongping Yu; Hongxia Ma; Ming Yin; Qingyi Wei
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 2.135

3.  Inter-individual variation in DNA repair capacity: a need for multi-pathway functional assays to promote translational DNA repair research.

Authors:  Zachary D Nagel; Isaac A Chaim; Leona D Samson
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2014-04-26

4.  Multiplexed DNA repair assays for multiple lesions and multiple doses via transcription inhibition and transcriptional mutagenesis.

Authors:  Zachary D Nagel; Carrie M Margulies; Isaac A Chaim; Siobhan K McRee; Patrizia Mazzucato; Anwaar Ahmad; Ryan P Abo; Vincent L Butty; Anthony L Forget; Leona D Samson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Variation in base excision repair capacity.

Authors:  David M Wilson; Daemyung Kim; Brian R Berquist; Alice J Sigurdson
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 2.433

Review 6.  Evaluating the effects of genetic variants of DNA repair genes using cytogenetic mutagen sensitivity approaches.

Authors:  Sherif Z Abdel-Rahman; Randa A El-Zein
Journal:  Biomarkers       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 2.658

7.  Reduced DNA Repair Capacity in Prostate Cancer Patients: A Phenotypic Approach Using the CometChip.

Authors:  Carmen Ortiz-Sánchez; Jarline Encarnación-Medina; Jong Y Park; Natasha Moreno; Gilberto Ruiz-Deya; Jaime Matta
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-25       Impact factor: 6.575

8.  Genome-wide association study reveals novel genetic determinants of DNA repair capacity in lung cancer.

Authors:  Li-E Wang; Olga Y Gorlova; Jun Ying; Yawei Qiao; Shih-Feng Weng; Annette T Lee; Peter K Gregersen; Margaret R Spitz; Christopher I Amos; Qingyi Wei
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2012-10-29       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  Cross tolerance in beet armyworm: long-term selection by cadmium broadens tolerance to other stressors.

Authors:  Maria Augustyniak; Monika Tarnawska; Agnieszka Babczyńska; Alina Kafel; Agnieszka Zawisza-Raszka; Bogumiła Adamek; Anna Płachetka-Bożek
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 2.823

10.  STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology--Molecular Epidemiology (STROBE-ME): an extension of the STROBE Statement.

Authors:  Valentina Gallo; Matthias Egger; Valerie McCormack; Peter B Farmer; John P A Ioannidis; Micheline Kirsch-Volders; Giuseppe Matullo; David H Phillips; Bernadette Schoket; Ulf Stromberg; Roel Vermeulen; Christopher Wild; Miquel Porta; Paolo Vineis
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 11.069

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.