Literature DB >> 20477828

Developing biodegradable scaffolds for tissue engineering of the urethra.

Mohamed Selim1, Anthony J Bullock, Keith A Blackwood, Christopher R Chapple, Sheila MacNeil.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop a synthetic biodegradable alternative to using human allodermis for the production of tissue-engineered buccal mucosa for substitution urethroplasty, looking specifically at issues of sterilization and cell-seeding protocols and, comparing the results to native buccal mucosa.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Three methods of sterilization, peracetic acid (PAA), γ-irradiation and ethanol, were evaluated for their effects on a biodegradable electrospun scaffold of polylactide-co-glycolide (PLGA, 85:15), to identify a sterilization method with minimal adverse effects on the scaffolds. Two protocols for seeding oral cells on the scaffold were compared, co-culture of fibroblasts and keratinocytes on the scaffolds for 14 days, and seeding fibroblasts for 5 days then adding keratinocytes for a further 10 days. Cell viability and proliferation on the scaffolds, scaffold contraction and mechanical properties of the scaffolds with and without cells were examined.
RESULTS: γ-irradiation and PAA sterilized scaffolds remained sterile for >3 months when incubated in antibiotic-free culture medium, while ethanol sterilized and unsterilized samples became infected within 2-14 days. All scaffolds showed extensive contraction (up to 50% over 14 days) irrespective of the method of sterilization or the presence of cells. All methods of sterilization, particularly ethanol, reduced the tensile strength of the scaffolds. The addition of cells tended to further reduce mechanical properties but increased elasticity. The cell-seeding protocol of adding fibroblasts for 5 days followed by keratinocytes for 10 days was the most promising, achieving a mean (sem) ultimate tensile stress of 1.20 (0.24) × 10⁵ N/m² compared to 3.77 (1.05) × 10⁵ N/m² for native buccal mucosa, and a Young's modulus of 2.40 (0.25) MPa, compared to 0.73 (0.09) MPa for the native buccal mucosa.
CONCLUSION: This study adds to our understanding of how sterilization and cell seeding affect the physical properties of scaffolds. Both PAA and γ-irradiation appear to be suitable methods for sterilizing PLGA scaffolds, although both reduce the tensile properties of the scaffolds. Cells grow well on the sterilized scaffolds, and with our current protocol produce constructs which have ≈ 30% of the mechanical strength and elasticity of the native buccal mucosa. We conclude that sterilized PLGA 85:15 is a promising material for producing tissue-engineered buccal mucosa.
© 2010 BJU INTERNATIONAL. NO CLAIM TO ORIGINAL US GOVERNMENT WORKS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 20477828     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09310.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  20 in total

1.  Ozone Gas as a Benign Sterilization Treatment for PLGA Nanofiber Scaffolds.

Authors:  Carolina Fracalossi Rediguieri; Terezinha de Jesus Andreoli Pinto; Nadia Araci Bou-Chacra; Raquel Galante; Gabriel Lima Barros de Araújo; Tatiana do Nascimento Pedrosa; Silvya Stuchi Maria-Engler; Paul A De Bank
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 3.056

2.  Developing improved tissue-engineered buccal mucosa grafts for urethral reconstruction.

Authors:  Abdulmuttalip Simsek; Anthony J Bullock; Sabi Roman; Chirstoper R Chapple; Sheila Macneil
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 3.  Regenerative medicine based applications to combat stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Hatim Thaker; Arun K Sharma
Journal:  World J Stem Cells       Date:  2013-10-26       Impact factor: 5.326

4.  Comparing different tissue-engineered repair materials for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence: which material is better?

Authors:  Xiaojuan Wang; Yisong Chen; Zhongyong Fan; Keqin Hua
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Quantification of DNA in urinary porcine bladder matrix using the ACTB gene.

Authors:  Erika Silva-Benítez; Eduardo Soto-Sáinz; Amaury Pozos-Guillen; José Geovanni Romero-Quintana; Maribel Aguilar-Medina; Alfredo Ayala-Ham; Eri Peña-Martínez; Rosalío Ramos-Payán; Héctor Flores
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim       Date:  2015-06-20       Impact factor: 2.416

Review 6.  Overview of Urethral Reconstruction by Tissue Engineering: Current Strategies, Clinical Status and Future Direction.

Authors:  Zahra Rashidbenam; Mohd Hafidzul Jasman; Pezhman Hafez; Guan Hee Tan; Eng Hong Goh; Xeng Inn Fam; Christopher Chee Kong Ho; Zulkifli Md Zainuddin; Reynu Rajan; Fatimah Mohd Nor; Mohamad Aznan Shuhaili; Nik Ritza Kosai; Farrah Hani Imran; Min Hwei Ng
Journal:  Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 4.169

7.  Postproduction processing of electrospun fibres for tissue engineering.

Authors:  Frazer J Bye; Linge Wang; Anthony J Bullock; Keith A Blackwood; Anthony J Ryan; Sheila MacNeil
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 1.355

8.  Outcome of urethral strictures treated by endoscopic urethrotomy and urethroplasty.

Authors:  Javier Tinaut-Ranera; Miguel Ángel Arrabal-Polo; Sergio Merino-Salas; Mercedes Nogueras-Ocaña; Víctor Manuel López-León; Francisco Palao-Yago; Miguel Arrabal-Martín; Clara Lahoz-García; Miguel Alaminos; Armando Zuluaga-Gomez
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.862

9.  Characterizing and optimizing poly-L-lactide-co-ε-caprolactone membranes for urothelial tissue engineering.

Authors:  Reetta Sartoneva; Anne-Marie Haaparanta; Tuija Lahdes-Vasama; Bettina Mannerström; Minna Kellomäki; Minna Salomäki; George Sándor; Riitta Seppänen; Susanna Miettinen; Suvi Haimi
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 4.118

10.  Epithelial-differentiated adipose-derived stem cells seeded bladder acellular matrix grafts for urethral reconstruction: an animal model.

Authors:  Hongbin Li; Yuemin Xu; Hong Xie; Chao Li; Lujie Song; Chao Feng; Qin Zhang; Minkai Xie; Ying Wang; Xiangguo Lv
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 3.845

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.