Literature DB >> 12641898

Genital morphology and fertilization success in the dung beetle Onthophagus taurus: an example of sexually selected male genitalia.

Clarissa M House1, Leigh W Simmons.   

Abstract

In animals with internal fertilization and promiscuous mating, male genitalia show rapid and divergent evolution. Three hypotheses have been suggested to explain the evolutionary processes responsible for genital evolution: the lock-and-key hypothesis, the pleiotropy hypothesis and the sexual-selection hypothesis. Here, we determine whether variation in male genital morphology influences fertilization success in the dung beetle Onthophagus taurus, as predicted by the sexual-selection hypothesis. Variation in four out of five genital sclerites of the endophallus influenced a male's fertilization success, supporting the general hypothesis that male genitalia can evolve under sexual selection. Furthermore, different genital sclerites were found to enhance first versus second male paternity, indicating that different sclerites serve offensive and defensive roles. Genital-trait variability was comparable to that in other species but was less variable than a non-genital sexually selected trait (head horns). We suggest that directional selection for genital elaboration may be countered by natural selection, which should favour genitalia of a size and shape necessary for efficient coupling and sperm transfer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12641898      PMCID: PMC1691274          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2266

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  9 in total

1.  Status-dependent selection in the dimorphic beetle Onthophagus taurus.

Authors:  J Hunt; L W Simmons
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Antagonistic coevolution between the sexes in a group of insects.

Authors:  Göran Arnqvist; Locke Rowe
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-02-14       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Maternal and paternal effects on offspring phenotype in the dung beetle Onthophagus taurus.

Authors:  J Hunt; L W Simmons
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Comparing evolvability and variability of quantitative traits.

Authors:  D Houle
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Dual function of the damselfly penis: sperm removal and transfer.

Authors:  J K Waage
Journal:  Science       Date:  1979-03-02       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Copulatory courtship and cryptic female choice in red flour beetles Tribolium castaneum.

Authors:  M Edvardsson; G Arnqvist
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Male horn dimorphism in the scarab beetle, Onthophagus taurus: do alternative reproductive tactics favour alternative phenotypes?

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.844

8.  Sperm competition games played by dimorphic male beetles: fertilization gains with equal mating access.

Authors:  J L Tomkins; L W Simmons
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Variation in sperm displacement and its association with accessory gland protein loci in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  A G Clark; M Aguadé; T Prout; L G Harshman; C H Langley
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 4.562

  9 in total
  43 in total

1.  Form and nature of precopulatory sexual selection in both sexes of a moth.

Authors:  Jin Xu; Qiao Wang
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2010-05-15

2.  Sperm competition, alternative mating tactics and context-dependent fertilization success in the burying beetle, Nicrophorus vespilloides.

Authors:  Clarissa M House; John Hunt; Allen J Moore
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-05-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Evolution of the male genitalia: morphological variation of the aedeagi in a natural population of Drosophila mediopunctata.

Authors:  Carlos A C Andrade; R D Vieira; G Ananina; Louis B Klaczko
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2008-02-29       Impact factor: 1.082

4.  Many ways to be small: different environmental regulators of size generate distinct scaling relationships in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Alexander W Shingleton; Chad M Estep; Michael V Driscoll; Ian Dworkin
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 5.  Evolution of genitalia: theories, evidence, and new directions.

Authors:  William G Eberhard
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.082

6.  Sexual conflict over mating in red-sided garter snakes (Thamnophis sirtalis) as indicated by experimental manipulation of genitalia.

Authors:  Christopher R Friesen; Emily J Uhrig; Mattie K Squire; Robert T Mason; Patricia L R Brennan
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Microscale laser surgery reveals adaptive function of male intromittent genitalia.

Authors:  Michal Polak; Arash Rashed
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Females prefer to associate with males with longer intromittent organs in mosquitofish.

Authors:  Andrew T Kahn; Brian Mautz; Michael D Jennions
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 3.703

9.  Ultrastructure of spermatozoa of Onthophagus taurus (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae) exhibits heritable variation.

Authors:  Michael Werner; Leigh W Simmons
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2011-01-29

10.  Experimental coevolution of male and female genital morphology.

Authors:  Leigh W Simmons; Francisco Garcia-Gonzalez
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2011-07-05       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.