Literature DB >> 20472366

Respiratory organ motion and dosimetric impact on breast and nodal irradiation.

X Sharon Qi1, Julia White, Rachel Rabinovitch, Kenneth Merrell, Amit Sood, Anderson Bauer, J Frank Wilson, Moyed Miften, X Allen Li.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To examine the respiratory motion for target and normal structures during whole breast and nodal irradiation and the resulting dosimetric impact. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Four-dimensional CT data sets of 18 patients with early-stage breast cancer were analyzed retrospectively. A three-dimensional conformal dosimetric plan designed to irradiate the breast was generated on the basis of CT images at 20% respiratory phase (reference phase). The reference plans were copied to other respiratory phases at 0% (end of inspiration) and 50% (end of expiration) to simulate the effects of breathing motion on whole breast irradiation. Dose-volume histograms, equivalent uniform dose, and normal tissue complication probability were evaluated and compared.
RESULTS: Organ motion of up to 8.8mm was observed during free breathing. A large lung centroid movement was typically associated with a large shift of other organs. The variation of planning target volume coverage during a free breathing cycle is generally within 1%-5% (17 of 18 patients) compared with the reference plan. However, up to 28% of V(45) variation for the internal mammary nodes was observed. Interphase mean dose variations of 2.2%, 1.2%, and 1.4% were observed for planning target volume, ipsilateral lung, and heart, respectively. Dose variations for the axillary nodes and brachial plexus were minimal.
CONCLUSIONS: The doses delivered to the target and normal structures are different from the planned dose based on the reference phase. During normal breathing, the dosimetric impact of respiratory motion is clinically insignificant with the exception of internal mammary nodes. However, noticeable degradation in dosimetric plan quality may be expected for the patients with large respiratory motion. 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20472366     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.11.053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  14 in total

1.  Estimation of optimal matching position for orthogonal kV setup images and minimal setup margins in radiotherapy of whole breast and lymph node areas.

Authors:  Marko Laaksomaa; Mika Kapanen; Tanja Skyttä; Seppo Peltola; Simo Hyödynmaa; Pirkko-Liisa Kellokumpu-Lehtinen
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2014-07-15

2.  Determination of the optimal matching position for setup images and minimal setup margins in adjuvant radiotherapy of breast and lymph nodes treated in voluntary deep inhalation breath-hold.

Authors:  Marko Laaksomaa; Mika Kapanen; Mikko Haltamo; Tanja Skyttä; Seppo Peltola; Simo Hyödynmaa; Pirkko-Liisa Kellokumpu-Lehtinen
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2015-04-03       Impact factor: 3.481

3.  Improving intra-fractional target position accuracy using a 3D surface surrogate for left breast irradiation using the respiratory-gated deep-inspiration breath-hold technique.

Authors:  Yi Rong; Steve Walston; Meng Xu Welliver; Arnab Chakravarti; Allison M Quick
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Accelerated partial breast irradiation using robotic radiotherapy: a dosimetric comparison with tomotherapy and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy.

Authors:  Erwann Rault; Thomas Lacornerie; Hong-Phuong Dang; Frederik Crop; Eric Lartigau; Nick Reynaert; David Pasquier
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2016-02-27       Impact factor: 3.481

5.  A comparison of the dosimetric effects of intrafraction motion on step-and-shoot, compensator, and helical tomotherapy-based IMRT.

Authors:  Ben J Waghorn; Robert J Staton; Justin M Rineer; Sanford L Meeks; Katja Langen
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2013-05-06       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  Correlation between target motion and the dosimetric variance of breast and organ at risk during whole breast radiotherapy using 4DCT.

Authors:  Wei Wang; Jian Bin Li; Hong Guang Hu; Feng Xiang Li; Min Xu; Tao Sun; Jie Lu
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2013-05-02       Impact factor: 3.481

7.  The dosimetric impact of respiratory breast movement and daily setup error on tangential whole breast irradiation using conventional wedge, field-in-field and irregular surface compensator techniques.

Authors:  Tomohisa Furuya; Satoru Sugimoto; Chie Kurokawa; Shuichi Ozawa; Kumiko Karasawa; Keisuke Sasai
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 2.724

8.  Evaluation of dosimetric variance in whole breast forward-planned intensity-modulated radiotherapy based on 4DCT and 3DCT.

Authors:  Wei Wang; Jian Bin Li; Hong Guang Hu; Tao Sun; Min Xu; Ting Yong Fan; Qian Shao
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 2.724

9.  Dosimetric Effects of the Interfraction Variations during Whole Breast Radiotherapy: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Julian Jacob; Steve Heymann; Isabelle Borget; Isabelle Dumas; Elyes Riahi; Pierre Maroun; Patrick Ezra; Elena Roberti; Sofia Rivera; Eric Deutsch; Céline Bourgier
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 6.244

10.  A comparison of dosimetric variance for external-beam partial breast irradiation using three-dimensional and four-dimensional computed tomography.

Authors:  Bing Guo; Jian-Bin Li; Wei Wang; Min Xu; Yan-Kang Li; Tong-Hai Liu
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.