Literature DB >> 20472234

Mid-term outcomes after intramedullary fixation of peritrochanteric femoral fractures using the new proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA).

Yake Liu1, Ran Tao, Fan Liu, Youhua Wang, Zhenyu Zhou, Yi Cao, Hong Wang.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Controversy persists concerning the preferred treatment of peritrochanteric femoral fractures. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the mid-term outcomes of the newly developed implants - proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) for the stabilisation of this type of fracture.
METHODS: Between April 2006 and March 2008, 169 patients with peritrochanteric femoral fractures were treated with PFNA. As many as 26 patients were excluded from the study. According to the Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA) classification system, the remaining 143 fractures were classified as 19 cases of AO/OTA 31A1 fractures, 83 cases of 31A2 fractures, 28 cases of 31A3 fractures and 13 cases of 31A combined with proximal 32 fracture or separate proximal 32 fracture. The mean age of these patients was 67 years (range, 20-93 years). The operative time, the overall fluoroscopy time, the duration of hospitalisation and the surgical complications were noted. Patients were followed up for a mean of 21 months (range, 12-36 months). Functional outcomes were assessed according to the Harris hip scoring system.
RESULTS: Fifteen patients (10%) required open reduction. The mean duration of surgery (from the beginning of close reduction to wound closure) was 72 min with a range between 45 and 170 min. The mean fluoroscopy time was 164 s with a range between 92 and 396 s. The mean time of hospital stay was 15 days. Postoperative X-rays showed a good or acceptable reduction in 134 cases (94%), and an ideal implant position in 131 cases (92%). There were 12 (8%) postoperative complications. All patients except one healed their fractures without any implant-specific complication (bending, breaking of the implant, cut out of the PFNA blade, femoral head penetration of the blade or ipsilateral fractures of the femoral shaft at the tip of the implant). The average time to bone healing was 16 weeks (range, 12-25 weeks). At the time of the latest follow-up, 106 patients (74%) were restored to their preoperative mobility. The mean Harris hip score was 84 points (range, 46-100 points). A total of 106 patients (74%) had an excellent or good outcome. According to the patients and/or their caregivers, outcome was described as satisfactory in 120(84%) of the 143 patients, and 36(90%) of the 40 patients, who were more than 80 years old.
CONCLUSION: The results suggest that PFNA is a very effective and safe method in the treatment of different patterns of peritrochanteric femoral fractures. The fixation is adequate to maintain reduction over time even in osteoporotic bones. Copyright 2010. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20472234     DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2010.03.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  27 in total

1.  Is helical blade nailing superior to locked minimally invasive plating in unstable pertrochanteric fractures?

Authors:  Matthias Knobe; Wolf Drescher; Nicole Heussen; Richard Martin Sellei; Hans-Christoph Pape
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Is helical blade superior to screw design in terms of cut-out rate for elderly trochanteric fractures? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Xiao Huang; Frankie Leung; Ming Liu; Long Chen; Zhao Xu; Zhou Xiang
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-02-21

Review 3.  Intertrochanteric fractures: a review of fixation methods.

Authors:  Senthil Nathan Sambandam; Jayadev Chandrasekharan; Varatharaj Mounasamy; Cyril Mauffrey
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2016-03-30

Review 4.  [Osteoporotic fractures of the proximal femur. What's new?].

Authors:  F Bonnaire; C Straßberger; M Kieb; P Bula
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 5.  [Treatment of peritrochanteric fractures: biomechanical considerations].

Authors:  G Krischak; L Dürselen; G Röderer
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.000

6.  Biomechanical study on the stability and strain conduction of intertrochanteric fracture fixed with proximal femoral nail antirotation versus triangular supporting intramedullary nail.

Authors:  Qi Zhang; Wei Chen; Yingze Zhang; Haicheng Wang; Weijie Yang; Kai Ding; Yanbin Zhu; Yifan Zhang; Chuan Ren; Kuo Zhao
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 3.479

7.  A comparative biomechanical study of proximal femoral nail (InterTAN) and proximal femoral nail antirotation for intertrochanteric fractures.

Authors:  Yanfeng Huang; Chunlin Zhang; Yi Luo
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-10-05       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid for reducing blood loss in elderly patients with intertrochanteric fracture treated with intramedullary fixation surgery: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Xiangping Luo; Hangqing Huang; Xiong Tang
Journal:  Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 1.511

9.  Role of Provisional Fixation of Fracture Fragments By Steinmann-Pin and Technical Tips in Proximal Femoral Nailing for Intertrochanteric Fracture.

Authors:  Mohit J Jain; Kinjal J Mavani; Dhaval Patel
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-06-01

10.  Internal fixation of intertrochanteric hip fractures: a clinical comparison of two implant designs.

Authors:  Ran Tao; Yue Lu; Hua Xu; Zhen-Yu Zhou; You-Hua Wang; Fan Liu
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2013-02-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.