Literature DB >> 20472021

Color stability of pigmented maxillofacial silicone elastomer: effects of nano-oxides as opacifiers.

Ying Han1, Yimin Zhao, Chao Xie, John M Powers, Sudarat Kiat-amnuay.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the effects of nano-oxides on the color stability of pigmented silicone A-2186 maxillofacial prosthetic elastomers before and after artificial aging.
METHODS: Each of three widely used UV-shielding nano-sized particle oxides (TiO(2), ZnO, CeO(2)), based on recent survey of the industry at 1%, 2%, 2.5% concentrations were combined with each of five intrinsic silicone pigment types (no pigments, red, yellow, blue, and a mixture of the three pigments). Silicone A-2186 without nano-oxides or pigments served as control, for a total of 46 experimental groups of elastomers. In each group of the study, all specimens were aged in an artificial aging chamber for an energy exposure of 450kJ/m(2). CIE L*a*b* values were measured by a spectrophotometer. The 50:50% perceptibility (ΔE*=1.1) and acceptability threshold (ΔE*=3.0) were used in interpretation of recorded color differences. Color differences after aging were subjected to three-way analysis of variance. Means were compared by Fisher's PLSD intervals at the 0.05 level of significance.
RESULTS: Yellow pigments mixed with all three nano-oxides at all intervals increased ΔE* values significantly from 3.7 up to 8.4. When mixed pigment groups were considered, TiO(2) at 2%, and 2.5% exhibited the smallest color changes, followed by ZnO and CeO(2), respectively (p<0.001). At 1%, CeO(2) exhibited the smallest color changes, followed by TiO(2) and ZnO, respectively (p<0.001). The smallest color differences, observed for nano-oxides groups, were recorded for CeO(2) at 1%, and TiO(2) at 2% and 2.5%. When the nano-oxides were tested at all concentrations, CeO(2) groups overall had the most color changes, and TiO(2) groups had the least. All ΔE* values of the mixed pigment groups were below the 50:50% acceptability threshold (ΔE*=1.2-2.3, below 3.0) except 2% CeO(2) (ΔE*=4.2).
CONCLUSION: 1% nano-CeO(2) and 2% and 2.5% nano-TiO(2) used as opacifiers for silicone A-2186 maxillofacial prostheses with mixed pigments exhibited the least color changes when subjected to artificial aging at 450kJ/m(2). Yellow silicone pigment mixed with all three nano-oxides significantly affected color stability of A-2186 silicone elastomer.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20472021     DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2010.05.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent        ISSN: 0300-5712            Impact factor:   4.379


  13 in total

1.  Effect of different disinfecting procedures on the hardness and color stability of two maxillofacial elastomers over time.

Authors:  Panagiota N Eleni; Magdalini K Krokida; Gregory L Polyzois; Lawrence Gettleman
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.698

2.  Influence of nanoparticles on color stability, microhardness, and flexural strength of acrylic resins specific for ocular prosthesis.

Authors:  Agda Marobo Andreotti; Marcelo Coelho Goiato; Amália Moreno; Adhara Smith Nobrega; Aldiéris Alves Pesqueira; Daniela Micheline dos Santos
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2014-12-10

3.  Effect of nanoscale particles incorporation on microhardness of polymers for oral prosthesis.

Authors:  Marcelo Coelho Goiato; Bruna Carolina Rossatti Zuccolotti; Amalia Moreno; Aljomar José Vechiato Filho; Marcela Borghi Paulini; Daniela Micheline Dos Santos
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep

4.  Effect of vulcanization temperature and dental stone colour on colour degradation of maxillofacial silicone elastomers.

Authors:  Ebru Demet Cifter; Meltem Ozdemir-Karatas; Emrah Baca; Adem Cinarli; Ali Balik; Erkan Sancakli; Bilge Gokcen-Rohlig
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 2.757

5.  Mechanical and Morphological Effect of Plant Based Antimicrobial Solutions on Maxillofacial Silicone Elastomer.

Authors:  Sophia Tetteh; Richard J Bibb; Simon J Martin
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 3.623

6.  Color stability of thermochromic pigment in maxillofacial silicone.

Authors:  Rosita Kantola; Lippo V J Lassila; Mimmi Tolvanen; Pekka K Valittu
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 1.904

7.  Evaluation of the effect of ultraviolet stabilizers on the change in color of pigmented silicone elastomer: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Mohit Kheur; Tania Sethi; Trevor Coward; Dilip Kakade; M Rajkumar
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep

8.  Evaluation of some mechanical properties of a new silicone elastomer for maxillofacial prostheses after addition of intrinsic pigments.

Authors:  Hussein A Abdullah; Faiza M Abdul-Ameer
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2018-05-28

Review 9.  The color stability of maxillofacial silicones: A systematic review and meta analysis.

Authors:  Priya Gupta; Saee Deshpande; Usha Radke; Suresh Ughade; Rajesh Sethuraman
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2021 Apr-Jun

10.  Effect of newly developed pigments and ultraviolet absorbers on the color change of pigmented silicone elastomer.

Authors:  Mohit G Kheur; Dilip Kakade; Coward J Trevor; Tabrez Amin Lakha; Tania Sethi
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2017 Oct-Dec
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.