Literature DB >> 20471935

Total hip arthroplasty offset measurement: is C T scan the most accurate option?

G Pasquier1, G Ducharne, E Sari Ali, F Giraud, A Mouttet, E Durante.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Femoral offset is difficult to precisely evaluate with conventional X-ray techniques. Femoral offset characterizes the balance between body weight and the resistance provided by the abductor muscles. Total hip arthroplasties should respect this balance. HYPOTHESIS: Computed tomodensitometry (CT-scan) is more accurate than conventional X-ray to evaluate femoral offset.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-one patients who received unilateral total hip arthroplasties were prospectively included in the study. Femoral offset was measured by three-dimensional CT-scan reconstruction using the "Hip Plan" (Symbios) software. Offset was also determined with conventional X-ray and results were compared. This software can be used to measure leg length by frontal telemetry. It was developed for preoperative-planning of cementless femoral stem implants with modular necks of various lengths and angles. All pre- and postoperative measurements were made according to the same protocol.
RESULTS: Femoral offset values in this study were very similar to anatomical values found in the literature. They were significantly higher than values obtained by conventional X-ray by an average of 8%. Implantation of hip replacements resulted in a significant increase in offset (1.88+/-4.71 mm) with a slight variation in leg length. Pre- and postoperative leg length increased slightly in the operated leg by an average of 1.66+/-5.63 mm. Seventeen percent of these femurs had high offset associated with small or average sized proximal medullary canals. This preoperative planning software made it possible to identify these difficulties and to adapt implant components using modular long 8 degrees varus necks to restore high offset. In most of these cases, only small femoral stems could be implanted because of the small size of the intramedullary femoral canal. These individual differences were identified with 3D CT-scan reconstruction and included in the preoperative planning. Moreover, leg length could also be evaluated with this method and included in the preplanning. DISCUSSION: Compared to conventional X-ray, measurements obtained with this preoperative planning method using 3D CT-scan reconstruction are easy to obtain and not dependent upon test conditions because the frame is placed on the femoral axis. Measurements are not influenced by position inconsistencies or if the hip is fixed in external rotation. The significant number of cases with above average offset confirms the importance of obtaining these measurements and the necessity of adapting the strategy in these cases by using lateralized stems, or, as in our series, modular necks to adjust femoral offset and neck angle. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III diagnostic prospective study. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20471935     DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2010.02.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res        ISSN: 1877-0568            Impact factor:   2.256


  16 in total

1.  Optimal anterior femoral offset for functional range of motion in total hip arthroplasty--a computer simulation study.

Authors:  Masanobu Hirata; Yasuharu Nakashima; Daisuke Hara; Masayuki Kanazawa; Yusuke Kohno; Kensei Yoshimoto; Yukihide Iwamoto
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  How to best measure femoral length and lateralisation after total hip arthroplasty on antero-posterior pelvic radiographs.

Authors:  Nicolas Bonin; Laurent Jacquot; Laurent Boulard; Patrick Reynaud; Mo Saffarini; Sébastien Lustig
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Validity, reliability and reproducibility of plain radiographic measurements after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Sarwar S Mahmood; Bariq Al-Amiry; Sebastian S Mukka; Saida Baea; Arkan S Sayed-Noor
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Offset and anteversion reconstruction after cemented and uncemented total hip arthroplasty: an evaluation with the low-dose EOS system comparing two- and three-dimensional imaging.

Authors:  Jean Yves Lazennec; Adrien Brusson; Folinais Dominique; Marc-Antoine Rousseau; Aidin Eslam Pour
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-12-20       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Reproducibility of length measurements of the lower limb by using EOS™.

Authors:  A Clavé; D G Maurer; N S Nagra; F Fazilleau; C Lefèvre; E Stindel
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2017-11-01

6.  Can Lateral Offset Be Used as a Predictive Marker for Proximal Femur Disorders?

Authors:  Bilge İpek Torun; Simel Kendir; Ferhat Geneci; Muhammed B Uzuner; Mert Ocak; Burak Bilecenoğlu; Çetin Işık; Kadir Desdicioğlu
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2021-11-28       Impact factor: 1.251

7.  A new understanding of radiographic landmarks of the greater trochanter that indicate correct femoral rotation for measurement of femoral offset.

Authors:  Jakub Tatka; Dimitri Delagrammaticas; Bryson R Kemler; Samuel I Rosenberg; Alex W Brady; Anna R Bryniarski; Grant J Dornan; Joel M Matta
Journal:  Arthroplasty       Date:  2022-06-01

8.  A study of femoral offset in the South Indian population and its clinical implications in hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Gautam Kumar; Mohamed Jisam; Jacob Varghese; Julio C Kandathil; Bipin Theruvil
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-10-04

9.  Relationships between Femoral Offset Change and Clinical Score following Bipolar Hip Arthroplasty in Femoral Neck Fractures.

Authors:  Sung Soo Kim; Hyeon Jun Kim; Chang Heon Shim
Journal:  Hip Pelvis       Date:  2021-06-04

10.  The intraoperative use of a calliper predicts leg length and offset after total hip arthroplasty. Component subsidence influences the leg length.

Authors:  Maliha Fansur; Nagib A Yurdi; Reinhard Stoewe
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-07-03       Impact factor: 2.359

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.