Literature DB >> 20471791

Retroperitoneal repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms offers postoperative benefits to male patients in the Veterans Affairs Health System.

Matthew J Borkon1, Victor Zaydfudim, Christopher D Carey, Colleen M Brophy, Raul J Guzman, Jeffery B Dattilo.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Transperitoneal (TP) and retroperitoneal (RP) approaches have equal efficacy in elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. The effect of open operative approach on patient-specific outcomes after AAA repair was tested.
METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing open AAA repair at the Veterans Affairs Tennessee Valley Healthcare System between January 2000 and August 2008 were retrospectively reviewed. Analysis was performed to examine the effects of demographic and clinical covariates on postoperative outcomes.
RESULTS: A total of 106 patients were identified: 54 with TP approach and 52 with RP approach. Demographics and preoperative comorbidities were equivalent (p > or = 0.10), with the exception of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease which was more prevalent in the TP group (61 vs. 40%). Operative times were longer in the TP group (4.6 vs. 3.5 hours; p < 0.01); however, significantly more TP patients had reconstruction with a bifurcated graft (72 vs. 2%; p < 0.01). Postoperative nasogastric tube decompression times were shorter in the RP group (1 vs. 3 days; p < 0.01), and RP approach led to a quicker return to preoperative diet (4 vs. 6 days; p = 0.05). Patients undergoing RP repair developed fewer incisional hernias (2 vs. 15%; p = 0.03).
CONCLUSION: RP approach to AAA repair offers patients faster return of bowel function and is associated with fewer incisional hernias. Copyright 2010 Annals of Vascular Surgery Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20471791     DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2010.02.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0890-5096            Impact factor:   1.466


  5 in total

1.  Wound complications of the retroperitoneal approach for the abdominal aortic aneurysm repair-an evaluation of abdominal bulge formation-.

Authors:  Naoki Hayashida; Masahisa Masuda; Yoko Pearce; Satoshi Kuwabara
Journal:  Ann Vasc Dis       Date:  2014-02-04

2.  Transabdominal open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair is associated with higher rates of late reintervention and readmission compared with the retroperitoneal approach.

Authors:  Sarah E Deery; Sara L Zettervall; Thomas F X O'Donnell; Philip P Goodney; Fred A Weaver; Pedro G Teixeira; Virendra I Patel; Marc L Schermerhorn
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 4.268

3.  Regional variation exists in patient selection and treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  Sara L Zettervall; Dominique B Buck; Peter A Soden; Jack L Cronenwett; Phillip P Goodney; Mohammad H Eslami; Jason T Lee; Marc L Schermerhorn
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 4.268

4.  Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal approach for open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in the targeted vascular National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

Authors:  Dominique B Buck; Klaas H J Ultee; Sara L Zettervall; Pete A Soden; Jeremy Darling; Mark Wyers; Joost A van Herwaarden; Marc L Schermerhorn
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 4.268

5.  Retroperitoneal versus transperitoneal approach for elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

Authors:  Fan Mei; Kaiyan Hu; Bing Zhao; Qianqian Gao; Fei Chen; Li Zhao; Mei Wu; Liyuan Feng; Zhe Wang; Jinwei Yang; Weiyi Zhang; Bin Ma
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-06-21
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.