BACKGROUND: the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) recently revised its guidelines for alcohol consumption during pregnancy and breast feeding, moving from a recommendation of minimising intake to one of abstinence. Women are potentially exposed to a variety of messages about alcohol and pregnancy, including from the media and social contacts, and are likely to see midwives as the source of expert advice in understanding these contradictory messages. OBJECTIVE: to explore the advice that midwives believe they give to pregnant women about alcohol consumption, and the advice that pregnant women believe they receive; the knowledge and attitudes of both groups regarding alcohol consumption and the consistency with the NHMRC guidelines; and the receptivity and comfort of both groups in discussing alcohol consumption in the context of antenatal appointments. DESIGN: individual semi-structured interviews with midwives and pregnant women. SETTING: face-to-face interviews with midwives and telephone interviews with pregnant women were conducted in two regional areas of New South Wales in 2008-2009. PARTICIPANTS: 12 midwives and 12 pregnant women. FINDINGS: midwives and pregnant women consistently agreed that conversations about alcohol are generally limited to brief screening questions at the first visit, and the risks are not discussed or explained (except for high-risk women). KEY CONCLUSIONS: both groups expressed comfort with the idea of discussing alcohol consumption, but lacked knowledge of the risk and recommendation, and it appears that this opportunity to provide women with information is under-utilised. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: there is a need to provide midwives with accurate information about the risks of alcohol consumption during pregnancy and effective communication tools to encourage them to discuss the risks and recommendations with their patients.
BACKGROUND: the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) recently revised its guidelines for alcohol consumption during pregnancy and breast feeding, moving from a recommendation of minimising intake to one of abstinence. Women are potentially exposed to a variety of messages about alcohol and pregnancy, including from the media and social contacts, and are likely to see midwives as the source of expert advice in understanding these contradictory messages. OBJECTIVE: to explore the advice that midwives believe they give to pregnant women about alcohol consumption, and the advice that pregnant women believe they receive; the knowledge and attitudes of both groups regarding alcohol consumption and the consistency with the NHMRC guidelines; and the receptivity and comfort of both groups in discussing alcohol consumption in the context of antenatal appointments. DESIGN: individual semi-structured interviews with midwives and pregnant women. SETTING: face-to-face interviews with midwives and telephone interviews with pregnant women were conducted in two regional areas of New South Wales in 2008-2009. PARTICIPANTS: 12 midwives and 12 pregnant women. FINDINGS: midwives and pregnant women consistently agreed that conversations about alcohol are generally limited to brief screening questions at the first visit, and the risks are not discussed or explained (except for high-risk women). KEY CONCLUSIONS: both groups expressed comfort with the idea of discussing alcohol consumption, but lacked knowledge of the risk and recommendation, and it appears that this opportunity to provide women with information is under-utilised. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: there is a need to provide midwives with accurate information about the risks of alcohol consumption during pregnancy and effective communication tools to encourage them to discuss the risks and recommendations with their patients.
Authors: A Finlay-Jones; M Symons; W Tsang; R Mullan; H Jones; A McKenzie; L Cannon; B Birda; N Reynolds; P Sargent; H Gailes; D Mayers; E J Elliott; C Bower Journal: Int J Popul Data Sci Date: 2020-12-10
Authors: Amy E Anderson; Alexis J Hure; Jennifer R Powers; Frances J Kay-Lambkin; Deborah J Loxton Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2012-09-13 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Melanie Kingsland; Emma Doherty; Amy E Anderson; Kristy Crooks; Belinda Tully; Danika Tremain; Tracey W Tsang; John Attia; Luke Wolfenden; Adrian J Dunlop; Nicole Bennett; Mandy Hunter; Sarah Ward; Penny Reeves; Ian Symonds; Chris Rissel; Carol Azzopardi; Andrew Searles; Karen Gillham; Elizabeth J Elliott; John Wiggers Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2018-08-20 Impact factor: 7.327