Literature DB >> 20471488

Energetic modelling: a comparison of the different approaches used in seabirds.

Jérôme Fort1, Warren P Porter, David Grémillet.   

Abstract

Studying energetics of marine top predators is essential to understand their role within food-webs and mechanisms associated with their survival and population dynamics. Several methods exist to estimate energy expenditure in captive and free-ranging animals. However, most of them are difficult to implement, restrained to specific periods, and are consequently inappropriate for seabirds. Supplementary and complementary approaches are therefore needed, and the use of modelling appears as an excellent option allowing energetic studies when field data collection is challenging. Currently three main energetics models are used, with various degrees of complexity and accuracy: allometric equations, time-energy-budget analyses and thermodynamic models. However, a comparison of their practicability and accuracy was still lacking. Here, we present an overview of these 3 model types, their characteristics, advantages and disadvantages, and areas of application in seabirds. We then investigate their accuracy by using them in parallel for the same dataset, and by comparing outputs with direct measurements (doubly-labelled water technique). We show that, when detailed data are available, time-energy-budget analysis is the best model to accurately predict seabird energy expenditures. Conversely, thermodynamic modelling allows reasonably accurate calculations when field data are scarce, and is therefore ideal to study energetics during the inter-breeding season.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20471488     DOI: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2010.05.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol        ISSN: 1095-6433            Impact factor:   2.320


  6 in total

1.  Field Metabolic Rate Is Dependent on Time-Activity Budget in Ring-Billed Gulls (Larus delawarensis) Breeding in an Anthropogenic Environment.

Authors:  Sarah C Marteinson; Jean-François Giroux; Jean-François Hélie; Marie-Line Gentes; Jonathan Verreault
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  A non-invasive approach to estimate the energetic requirements of an increasing seabird population in a perturbed marine ecosystem.

Authors:  Davide Gaglio; Richard B Sherley; Peter G Ryan; Timothée R Cook
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Reflection of near-infrared light confers thermal protection in birds.

Authors:  Iliana Medina; Elizabeth Newton; Michael R Kearney; Raoul A Mulder; Warren P Porter; Devi Stuart-Fox
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 14.919

4.  Validation of a Mechanistic Model for Non-Invasive Study of Ecological Energetics in an Endangered Wading Bird with Counter-Current Heat Exchange in its Legs.

Authors:  Megan J Fitzpatrick; Paul D Mathewson; Warren P Porter
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Energyscapes and prey fields shape a North Atlantic seabird wintering hotspot under climate change.

Authors:  F Amélineau; J Fort; P D Mathewson; D C Speirs; N Courbin; S Perret; W P Porter; R J Wilson; D Grémillet
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 2.963

6.  Arctic climate change and pollution impact little auk foraging and fitness across a decade.

Authors:  Françoise Amélineau; David Grémillet; Ann M A Harding; Wojciech Walkusz; Rémi Choquet; Jérôme Fort
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.