Literature DB >> 20471247

Prostate cancer: trends in incidence, survival and mortality in the Netherlands, 1989-2006.

R G H M Cremers1, H E Karim-Kos, S Houterman, R H A Verhoeven, F H Schröder, T H van der Kwast, P J M Kil, J W W Coebergh, L A L M Kiemeney.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer occurrence and stage distribution changed dramatically during the end of the 20th century. This study aimed to quantify and explain trends in incidence, stage distribution, survival and mortality in the Netherlands between 1989 and 2006.
METHODS: Population-based data from the nationwide Netherlands Cancer Registry and Causes of Death Registry were used. Annual incidence and mortality rates were calculated and age-adjusted to the European Standard Population. Trends in rates were evaluated by age, clinical stage and differentiation grade.
RESULTS: 120,965 men were newly diagnosed with prostate cancer between 1989 and 2006. Age-adjusted incidence rates increased from 63 to 104 per 100,000 person-years in this period. Two periods of increasing incidence rates could be distinguished with increases predominantly in cT2-tumours between 1989 and 1995 and predominantly in cT1c-tumours since 2001. cT4/N+/M+-tumour incidence rates decreased from 23 in 1993 to 18 in 2006. The trend towards earlier detection was accompanied by a lower mean age at diagnosis (from 74 in 1989 to 70 in 2006), increased frequency of treatment with curative intent and improved 5-year relative survival. Mortality rates decreased from 34 in 1996 to 26 in 2007.
CONCLUSIONS: The increase of prostate cancer incidence in the early 1990s was probably caused by increased prostate cancer awareness combined with diagnostic improvements (transrectal ultrasound, (thin) needle biopsies), but not PSA testing. The subsequent peak since 2001 is probably attributable to PSA testing. The decline in prostate cancer mortality from 1996 onwards may be the consequence of increased detection of cT2-tumours between 1989 and 1995. Unfortunately, data on the use of PSA tests and other prostate cancer diagnostics to support these conclusions are lacking. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20471247     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.03.040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  7 in total

1.  Efficacy versus effectiveness study design within the European screening trial for prostate cancer: consequences for cancer incidence, overall mortality and cancer-specific mortality.

Authors:  Xiaoye Zhu; Pim J van Leeuwen; Erik Holmberg; Meelan Bul; Sigrid Carlsson; Fritz H Schröder; Monique J Roobol; Jonas Hugosson
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.136

Review 2.  Defining the threshold for significant versus insignificant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Theo H Van der Kwast; Monique J Roobol
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 14.432

3.  Vegetarianism, low meat consumption and the risk of lung, postmenopausal breast and prostate cancer in a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  A M J Gilsing; M P Weijenberg; R A Goldbohm; P C Dagnelie; P A van den Brandt; L J Schouten
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 4.016

4.  Age dependence of modern clinical risk groups for localized prostate cancer-A population-based study.

Authors:  Minh-Phuong Huynh-Le; Tor Åge Myklebust; Christine H Feng; Roshan Karunamuni; Tom Børge Johannesen; Anders M Dale; Ole A Andreassen; Tyler M Seibert
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Socio-economic inequalities in survival of patients with prostate cancer: role of age and Gleason grade at diagnosis.

Authors:  Kashif Shafique; David S Morrison
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The impact of prostate cancer diagnosis and treatment decision-making on health-related quality of life before treatment onset.

Authors:  Maarten Cuypers; Romy E D Lamers; Erik B Cornel; Lonneke V van de Poll-Franse; Marieke de Vries; Paul J M Kil
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  Cancer morbidity trends and regional differences in England-A Bayesian analysis.

Authors:  Ayşe Arık; Erengul Dodd; George Streftaris
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.