Literature DB >> 20469926

Detection of damaged DNA bases by DNA glycosylase enzymes.

Joshua I Friedman1, James T Stivers.   

Abstract

A fundamental and shared process in all forms of life is the use of DNA glycosylase enzymes to excise rare damaged bases from genomic DNA. Without such enzymes, the highly ordered primary sequences of genes would rapidly deteriorate. Recent structural and biophysical studies are beginning to reveal a fascinating multistep mechanism for damaged base detection that begins with short-range sliding of the glycosylase along the DNA chain in a distinct conformation we call the search complex (SC). Sliding is frequently punctuated by the formation of a transient "interrogation" complex (IC) where the enzyme extrahelically inspects both normal and damaged bases in an exosite pocket that is distant from the active site. When normal bases are presented in the exosite, the IC rapidly collapses back to the SC, while a damaged base will efficiently partition forward into the active site to form the catalytically competent excision complex (EC). Here we review the unique problems associated with enzymatic detection of rare damaged DNA bases in the genome and emphasize how each complex must have specific dynamic properties that are tuned to optimize the rate and efficiency of damage site location.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20469926      PMCID: PMC2886154          DOI: 10.1021/bi100593a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  72 in total

1.  DNA lesion recognition by the bacterial repair enzyme MutM.

Authors:  J Christopher Fromme; Gregory L Verdine
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2003-10-01       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 2.  Base-excision repair of oxidative DNA damage.

Authors:  Sheila S David; Valerie L O'Shea; Sucharita Kundu
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-06-21       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  DNA damage recognition and repair by 3-methyladenine DNA glycosylase I (TAG).

Authors:  Audrey H Metz; Thomas Hollis; Brandt F Eichman
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2007-04-05       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 4.  Extrahelical damaged base recognition by DNA glycosylase enzymes.

Authors:  James T Stivers
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 5.236

5.  Correlated cleavage of single- and double-stranded substrates by uracil-DNA glycosylase.

Authors:  Viktoriya S Sidorenko; Grigory V Mechetin; Georgy A Nevinsky; Dmitry O Zharkov
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2008-01-15       Impact factor: 4.124

6.  Crystal structure of human thymine DNA glycosylase bound to DNA elucidates sequence-specific mismatch recognition.

Authors:  Atanu Maiti; Michael T Morgan; Edwin Pozharski; Alexander C Drohat
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-06-27       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Enzymatic capture of an extrahelical thymine in the search for uracil in DNA.

Authors:  Jared B Parker; Mario A Bianchet; Daniel J Krosky; Joshua I Friedman; L Mario Amzel; James T Stivers
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-08-19       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Transition-state analysis of the DNA repair enzyme MutY.

Authors:  Joe A B McCann; Paul J Berti
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2008-04-05       Impact factor: 15.419

9.  Electrostatic guidance of glycosyl cation migration along the reaction coordinate of uracil DNA glycosylase.

Authors:  Mario A Bianchet; Lauren A Seiple; Yu Lin Jiang; Yoshitaka Ichikawa; L Mario Amzel; James T Stivers
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2003-11-04       Impact factor: 3.162

10.  A rapid reaction analysis of uracil DNA glycosylase indicates an active mechanism of base flipping.

Authors:  Stuart R W Bellamy; Kuakarun Krusong; Geoff S Baldwin
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2007-02-06       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  94 in total

1.  Cosolute paramagnetic relaxation enhancements detect transient conformations of human uracil DNA glycosylase (hUNG).

Authors:  Yan Sun; Joshua I Friedman; James T Stivers
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 3.162

Review 2.  Overview of base excision repair biochemistry.

Authors:  Yun-Jeong Kim; David M Wilson
Journal:  Curr Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 3.339

3.  Single-stranded DNA scanning and deamination by APOBEC3G cytidine deaminase at single molecule resolution.

Authors:  Gayan Senavirathne; Malgorzata Jaszczur; Paul A Auerbach; Thomas G Upton; Linda Chelico; Myron F Goodman; David Rueda
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Domain structure of the DEMETER 5-methylcytosine DNA glycosylase.

Authors:  Young Geun Mok; Rie Uzawa; Jiyoon Lee; Gregory M Weiner; Brandt F Eichman; Robert L Fischer; Jin Hoe Huh
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-10-25       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Dynamics of uracil and 5-fluorouracil in DNA.

Authors:  Jared B Parker; James T Stivers
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 3.162

6.  Nicastrin functions to sterically hinder γ-secretase-substrate interactions driven by substrate transmembrane domain.

Authors:  David M Bolduc; Daniel R Montagna; Yongli Gu; Dennis J Selkoe; Michael S Wolfe
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Balancing between affinity and speed in target DNA search by zinc-finger proteins via modulation of dynamic conformational ensemble.

Authors:  Levani Zandarashvili; Alexandre Esadze; Dana Vuzman; Catherine A Kemme; Yaakov Levy; Junji Iwahara
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-08-31       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Repair of 8-oxoG:A mismatches by the MUTYH glycosylase: Mechanism, metals and medicine.

Authors:  Douglas M Banda; Nicole N Nuñez; Michael A Burnside; Katie M Bradshaw; Sheila S David
Journal:  Free Radic Biol Med       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 7.376

9.  Human AP-endonuclease (Ape1) activity on telomeric G4 structures is modulated by acetylatable lysine residues in the N-terminal sequence.

Authors:  Silvia Burra; Daniela Marasco; Matilde Clarissa Malfatti; Giulia Antoniali; Antonella Virgilio; Veronica Esposito; Bruce Demple; Aldo Galeone; Gianluca Tell
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2018-11-22

10.  Comparative Effects of Ions, Molecular Crowding, and Bulk DNA on the Damage Search Mechanisms of hOGG1 and hUNG.

Authors:  Shannen L Cravens; James T Stivers
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 3.162

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.