Literature DB >> 20466427

Outcomes of iris-claw anterior chamber versus iris-fixated foldable intraocular lens in subluxated lens secondary to Marfan syndrome.

Denise E Hirashima1, Eduardo S Soriano, Rodrigo L Meirelles, Gustave N Alberti, Walton Nosé.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the outcome of phacoemulsification using 2 different iris-fixation techniques for intraocular lens (IOL) replacement, a foldable posterior chamber IOL (PCIOL; AcrySof MA60AC, Alcon Laboratories Inc, Fort Worth, TX) and an iris-claw anterior chamber IOL (ACIOL; Artisan, Ophtec BV), for treatment of subluxated lenses in patients with Marfan syndrome (MFS).
DESIGN: Randomized, controlled trial. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 31 eyes of 16 patients with subluxated lenses associated with MFS and a preoperative corrected visual acuity (CVA) < or =20/40 based on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study chart.
METHODS: Patients were enrolled and the eye with worse visual acuity was randomly assigned to 1 of 2 study arms: phacoemulsification and iris-fixated PCIOL or phacoemulsification and iris-claw ACIOL; the second eye of the same patient received the other IOL type. Preoperative and postoperative ophthalmologic examination, optical coherence tomography, and endothelial cell counts were performed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We recorded CVA results at 3, 6, and 12 months, complications, endothelial cell loss, and central retinal thickness.
RESULTS: In the iris-fixated PCIOL group, CVA was significantly improved at 3 (P = 0.011; n = 16), 6 (P = 0.006; n = 16), and 12 months (P = 0.002; n = 16). In the iris-claw ACIOL group, CVA was significantly improved at 3 (P = 0.001; n=15), 6 (P = 0.001; n = 15), and 12 months (P = 0.009; n = 12). The CVA results did not differ significantly between groups. Dislocation of the IOL occurred in 3 of 16 (18.75%) eyes in the PCIOL group. Retinal detachment occurred in 3 eyes (2 in the PCIOL group and 1 in the ACIOL group) and was successfully repaired. Postoperative foveal tomograms in both groups revealed a decrease in the mean foveal thickness (MFT; < or =172 microm) in 54.16% of the patients.
CONCLUSIONS: The iris-sutured PCIOL and iris-claw ACIOL produced comparable improvements in CVA at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Although IOL dislocation tended to occur more frequently in the iris-fixated PCIOL group, the difference was not significant. At 6 months postoperatively, all study patients tended to have a thinner MFT. None of the patients in either group developed cystoid macular edema. Copyright 2010 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20466427     DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.12.043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  15 in total

1.  A knotless, one-haptic fixation of posterior chamber intraocular lenses: one-year results.

Authors:  Pipat Kongsap
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Incidence of cystoid macular edema with iris-fixated posterior chamber intraocular lenses in patients presenting with lens dislocation.

Authors:  Irene Rusu; Zhe Chen; Jessica Zizva; Jane S Myung; Kenneth J Wald
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 2.031

3.  STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND COMPREHENSIVE SURGICAL OUTCOMES OF THE SUTURELESS INTRASCLERAL FIXATION OF SECONDARY INTRAOCULAR LENSES IN HUMAN EYES.

Authors:  Bozho Todorich; Maxwell S Stem; Keshav Kooragayala; Aristomenis Thanos; Lisa J Faia; George A Williams; Tarek S Hassan; Maria A Woodward; Jeremy D Wolfe
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 4.256

4.  Complications and outcomes of descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty with artisan aphakia intraocular lens implantation.

Authors:  Rong-Mei Peng; Yu-Xin Guo; Yuan Qiu; Yan-Sheng Hao; Jing Hong
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 1.779

Review 5.  Anterior chamber intraocular lens, sutured posterior chamber intraocular lens, or glued intraocular lens: where do we stand?

Authors:  Derick G Holt; Jason Young; Brian Stagg; Balamurali K Ambati
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 3.761

6.  Incidence of retinal detachment after lens surgery in children and young adults with nontraumatic ectopia lentis.

Authors:  Hwan Heo; Scott R Lambert
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 3.528

7.  Intraocular lens subluxation in marfan syndrome.

Authors:  Bolaños-Jiménez Rodrigo; López-Lizárraga E Paulina; March de R Francesc; Telich-Tarriba J Eduardo; Navas Alejandro
Journal:  Open Ophthalmol J       Date:  2014-09-19

8.  Iris reconstruction combined with iris-claw intraocular lens implantation for the management of iris-lens injured patients.

Authors:  Shufang Hu; Mingling Wang; Tianlin Xiao; Zhenquan Zhao
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.848

9.  Retropupillary iris-claw intraocular lens in ectopia lentis in Marfan syndrome.

Authors:  Mun Yueh Faria; Nuno Ferreira; Eliana Neto
Journal:  Int Med Case Rep J       Date:  2016-06-17

10.  Dislocated Intraocular Lens Extraction and Iris-Claw Lens Implantation in Vitrectomized and Non-vitrectomized Eyes

Authors:  M. Giray Ersöz; Mümin Hocaoğlu; Işıl Bahar Sayman Muslubaş; Serra Arf; Murat Karaçorlu
Journal:  Turk J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-10-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.