BACKGROUND: This study assessed the association between social support and the severity of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) symptoms in a sample of severely affected IBS patients recruited to an NIH-funded clinical trial. In addition, we examined if the effects of social support on IBS pain are mediated through the effects on stress. METHODS: Subjects were 105 Rome II diagnosed IBS patients (F = 85%) who completed seven questionnaires which were collected as part of a pretreatment baseline assessment. KEY RESULTS: Partial correlations were conducted to clarify the relationships between social support and clinically relevant variables with baseline levels of psychopathology, holding constant number of comorbid medical diseases, age, gender, marital status, ethnicity, and education. Analyses indicated that social support was inversely related to IBS symptom severity. Social support was positively related with less severe pain. A similar pattern of data was found for perceived stress but not quality of life impairment. Regression analyses examined if the effects of social support on pain are mediated by stress. The effects of social support on bodily pain were mediated by stress such that the greater the social support the less stress and the less pain. This effect did not hold for symptom severity, quality of life, or psychological distress. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: This study links the perceived adequacy of social support to the global severity of symptoms of IBS and its cardinal symptom (pain). It also suggests that the mechanism by which social support alleviates pain is through a reduction in stress levels.
BACKGROUND: This study assessed the association between social support and the severity of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) symptoms in a sample of severely affected IBSpatients recruited to an NIH-funded clinical trial. In addition, we examined if the effects of social support on IBS pain are mediated through the effects on stress. METHODS: Subjects were 105 Rome II diagnosed IBSpatients (F = 85%) who completed seven questionnaires which were collected as part of a pretreatment baseline assessment. KEY RESULTS: Partial correlations were conducted to clarify the relationships between social support and clinically relevant variables with baseline levels of psychopathology, holding constant number of comorbid medical diseases, age, gender, marital status, ethnicity, and education. Analyses indicated that social support was inversely related to IBS symptom severity. Social support was positively related with less severe pain. A similar pattern of data was found for perceived stress but not quality of life impairment. Regression analyses examined if the effects of social support on pain are mediated by stress. The effects of social support on bodily pain were mediated by stress such that the greater the social support the less stress and the less pain. This effect did not hold for symptom severity, quality of life, or psychological distress. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: This study links the perceived adequacy of social support to the global severity of symptoms of IBS and its cardinal symptom (pain). It also suggests that the mechanism by which social support alleviates pain is through a reduction in stress levels.
Authors: B D Naliboff; S W Derbyshire; J Munakata; S Berman; M Mandelkern; L Chang; E A Mayer Journal: Psychosom Med Date: 2001 May-Jun Impact factor: 4.312
Authors: Jeffrey M Lackner; Gregory D Gudleski; Rebecca Firth; Laurie Keefer; Darren M Brenner; Katie Guy; Camille Simonetti; Christopher Radziwon; Sarah Quinton; Susan S Krasner; Leonard Katz; Guido Garbarino; Gary D Iacobucci; Michael D Sitrin Journal: J Psychosom Res Date: 2013-04-30 Impact factor: 3.006
Authors: Rachel D Moloney; Anthony C Johnson; Siobhain M O'Mahony; Timothy G Dinan; Beverley Greenwood-Van Meerveld; John F Cryan Journal: CNS Neurosci Ther Date: 2015-12-10 Impact factor: 5.243
Authors: Heidi Glynn; Stephan P Möller; Helen Wilding; Pragalathan Apputhurai; Gregory Moore; Simon R Knowles Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 2021-01-12 Impact factor: 3.199
Authors: Lukas Van Oudenhove; Michael D Crowell; Douglas A Drossman; Albena D Halpert; Laurie Keefer; Jeffrey M Lackner; Tasha B Murphy; Bruce D Naliboff; Rona L Levy Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2016-02-18 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: J-M Sabate; D Deutsch; C Melchior; A Entremont; F Mion; M Bouchoucha; S Façon; J-J Raynaud; F Zerbib; P Jouët Journal: Ethics Med Public Health Date: 2021-03-24