Literature DB >> 20464886

Managing cetuximab hypersensitivity-infusion reactions: incidence, risk factors, prevention, and retreatment.

Thomas J George1, Kourtney D Laplant, Edmund O Walden, Arlene B Davis, Charles E Riggs, Julia L Close, Sarah N George, James W Lynch.   

Abstract

Cetuximab is an anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibody approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of colorectal (CRC) and head and neck (H&N) cancers. Hypersensitivity-infusion reactions (HIRs) confer moderate morbidity and potential mortality. HIRs have a wide geographic incidence with few identifiable risk factors. Limited data regarding risk-reduction interventions for HIR or post-HIR retreatment are available. All patients treated with cetuximab at a single Veterans Affairs facility were monitored for development of HIRs, with baseline clinical, demographic, and supportive care data recorded. All received standard premedication based on cohort assignment. A total of 51 consecutive patients (30 CRC; 21 H&N) received at least one dose of cetuximab. Grades II-IV HIRs occurred in 14 patients (27%; 6 grade II, 6 grade Ill, 2 grade IV). There was no grade V HIR. All HIRs occurred during the first infusion. There were no differences between age, race, diagnosis, stage, concurrent chemotherapy, or radiotherapy with cetuximab, allergy history, or military service era of patients developing HIRs versus those who did not.There were no identifiable risk factors that predicted the severity of HIR. Neither premedication modifications (P = 0.34) nor bronchodilator use (P= 0.12) impacted the incidence or severity of HIR. A cetuximab test dose successfully elicited an HIR and resulted in an 87% cost savings. None of five patients receiving subsequent retreatment with anti-EGFR MoAb had recurrence of an HIR. An HIR during cetuximab infusion can be a serious and underestimated toxicity. The relatively high incidence reported here is consistent with that previously identified in the Southeastern United States. No clinical, demographic, or historic variables reliably predicted HIR in our population. Use of a test dose to elicit a HIR appears to be feasible and cost-effective. Use of panitumumab after a cetuximab HIR in select patients with CRC appears to be feasible and safe.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20464886

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Support Oncol        ISSN: 1544-6794


  16 in total

1.  Fatal infusion reactions to cetuximab: role of immunoglobulin e-mediated anaphylaxis.

Authors:  Yoann Pointreau; Scott P Commins; Gilles Calais; Hervé Watier; Thomas A E Platts-Mills
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-12-12       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Monoclonal antibodies: longitudinal prescribing information analysis of hypersensitivity reactions.

Authors:  Konstantin Kleyman; Debra S Weintraub
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 5.857

3.  Different patterns of toxicity after sequential administration of two anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies.

Authors:  Miriam López-Gómez; César Gómez-Raposo; María Sereno; Francisco Zambrana; Enrique Casado
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 4.  Diagnoses and Management of Drug Hypersensitivity and Anaphylaxis in Cancer and Chronic Inflammatory Diseases: Reactions to Taxanes and Monoclonal Antibodies.

Authors:  Rafael Bonamichi-Santos; Mariana Castells
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 8.667

5.  Assessment of cetuximab-induced infusion reactions and administration rechallenge at an academic medical center.

Authors:  Ellen Burke; Michelle Rockey; Dennis Grauer; Dave Henry; Prakash Neupane
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 3.064

6.  Risk factors for and pre-medications to prevent cetuximab-induced infusion reactions in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

Authors:  Waseem Touma; Sami S Koro; Jessica Ley; Tanya M Wildes; Loren Michel; Yu Tao; Douglas Adkins
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 5.337

7.  Mechanism of action of the atypical retinoid ST1926 in colorectal cancer: DNA damage and DNA polymerase α.

Authors:  Rana Abdel-Samad; Patrick Aouad; Hala Gali-Muhtasib; Zeinab Sweidan; Raed Hmadi; Humam Kadara; Egildo Luca D'Andrea; Alessandra Fucci; Claudio Pisano; Nadine Darwiche
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 6.166

8.  Anaphylactic reactions to oligosaccharides in red meat: a syndrome in evolution.

Authors:  Hana Saleh; Scott Embry; Andromeda Nauli; Seif Atyia; Guha Krishnaswamy
Journal:  Clin Mol Allergy       Date:  2012-03-07

Review 9.  Systematic review on infusion reactions associated with chemotherapies and monoclonal antibodies for metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Xue Song; Stacey R Long; Beth Barber; Cheryl A Kassed; Marcus Healey; Clare Jones; Zhongyun Zhao
Journal:  Curr Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-02-01

10.  Nationwide pharmacovigilance data for cetuximab-induced anaphylaxis and predictive model validation using prospective specific IgE detection.

Authors:  Kyung Hee Park; Jongsun Lee; Seung Hoon Beom; Sang Joon Shin; Joong Bae Ahn; Sung-Ryeol Kim; Jae-Hyun Lee; Jung-Won Park
Journal:  World Allergy Organ J       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 4.084

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.