Literature DB >> 25037161

Risk factors for and pre-medications to prevent cetuximab-induced infusion reactions in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

Waseem Touma1, Sami S Koro2, Jessica Ley2, Tanya M Wildes3, Loren Michel3, Yu Tao4, Douglas Adkins5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Cetuximab, a chimeric monoclonal antibody, is the only targeted therapy approved for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). Infusion reactions (IRs) occur in 6-18% of patients pre-medicated with diphenhydramine. Evidence for clinical risk factors for IRs is limited and the benefit of additional pre-medication to prevent IRs is unclear.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective, single institution study of 243 SCCHN patients treated with cetuximab to evaluate potential risk factors for IRs and to assess the efficacy of additional pre-medications (nebulized albuterol and intravenous (IV) corticosteroids and/or H2-blockers) to decrease the risk of IR.
RESULTS: IR (grades 1-4) and high grade (grades 3-4 only) IR occurred in 47 (19.3%) and 16 (6.6%) patients, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified Caucasian race (OR7.11, p=0.003), medication allergy (OR3.74, p=0.002), and blood eosinophils >3% (OR2.75, p=0.01) independently increased the risk of IR; Caucasian race (OR5.57, p=0.007) and medication allergy (OR4.10, p=0.0007) increased the risk of high grade IR. IR (grades 1-4) and high grade IR occurred in 31.8% and 22.7% pre-medicated with diphenhydramine alone. Univariate analysis identified albuterol, famotidine, and corticosteroids decreased the risk of high grade IR. Furthermore, there was a significant difference between the possible combinations of the pre-medications and the risk of high grade IR by Fisher Exact test (p=0.003) whereby the combination of albuterol, famotidine and corticosteroids was effective in preventing high grade IR. Thirty (64%) of the 47 patients who developed an IR were re-challenged and did not experience a recurrence of an IR.
CONCLUSION: These data may be used to identify patients at higher risk for cetuximab-induced IR who may be advised to not receive cetuximab or who may benefit from additional pre-medications to decrease the risk of a high grade IR.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cetuximab; Infusion reaction; Pre-medication; Risk factors

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25037161      PMCID: PMC4130782          DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2014.06.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oral Oncol        ISSN: 1368-8375            Impact factor:   5.337


  19 in total

1.  Infusion-related and hypersensitivity reactions of monoclonal antibodies used to treat colorectal cancer--identification, prevention, and management.

Authors:  Soonmo Peter Kang; Muhammad Wasif Saif
Journal:  J Support Oncol       Date:  2007-10

2.  Association of asthma with serum IgE levels and skin-test reactivity to allergens.

Authors:  B Burrows; F D Martinez; M Halonen; R A Barbee; M G Cline
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1989-02-02       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Cetuximab monotherapy and cetuximab plus irinotecan in irinotecan-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  David Cunningham; Yves Humblet; Salvatore Siena; David Khayat; Harry Bleiberg; Armando Santoro; Danny Bets; Matthias Mueser; Andreas Harstrick; Chris Verslype; Ian Chau; Eric Van Cutsem
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-07-22       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Cetuximab-induced anaphylaxis and IgE specific for galactose-alpha-1,3-galactose.

Authors:  Christine H Chung; Beloo Mirakhur; Emily Chan; Quynh-Thu Le; Jordan Berlin; Michael Morse; Barbara A Murphy; Shama M Satinover; Jacob Hosen; David Mauro; Robbert J Slebos; Qinwei Zhou; Diane Gold; Tina Hatley; Daniel J Hicklin; Thomas A E Platts-Mills
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-03-13       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Phase II trial of cetuximab in patients with refractory colorectal cancer that expresses the epidermal growth factor receptor.

Authors:  Leonard B Saltz; Neal J Meropol; Patrick J Loehrer; Michael N Needle; Justin Kopit; Robert J Mayer
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-03-01       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  High incidence of cetuximab-related infusion reactions in Tennessee and North Carolina and the association with atopic history.

Authors:  Bert H O'Neil; Robert Allen; David R Spigel; Thomas E Stinchcombe; Dominic T Moore; Jordan D Berlin; Richard M Goldberg
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-08-20       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Open-label, uncontrolled, multicenter phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of cetuximab as a single agent in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck who failed to respond to platinum-based therapy.

Authors:  Jan B Vermorken; José Trigo; Ricardo Hitt; Piotr Koralewski; Eduardo Diaz-Rubio; Frédéric Rolland; Rainald Knecht; Nadia Amellal; Armin Schueler; José Baselga
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-06-01       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Radiotherapy plus cetuximab for squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

Authors:  James A Bonner; Paul M Harari; Jordi Giralt; Nozar Azarnia; Dong M Shin; Roger B Cohen; Christopher U Jones; Ranjan Sur; David Raben; Jacek Jassem; Roger Ove; Merrill S Kies; Jose Baselga; Hagop Youssoufian; Nadia Amellal; Eric K Rowinsky; K Kian Ang
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-02-09       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Second symposium on the definition and management of anaphylaxis: summary report--Second National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease/Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Network symposium.

Authors:  Hugh A Sampson; Anne Muñoz-Furlong; Ronna L Campbell; N Franklin Adkinson; S Allan Bock; Amy Branum; Simon G A Brown; Carlos A Camargo; Rita Cydulka; Stephen J Galli; Jane Gidudu; Rebecca S Gruchalla; Allen D Harlor; David L Hepner; Lawrence M Lewis; Phillip L Lieberman; Dean D Metcalfe; Robert O'Connor; Antonella Muraro; Amanda Rudman; Cara Schmitt; Debra Scherrer; F Estelle R Simons; Stephen Thomas; Joseph P Wood; Wyatt W Decker
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 10.793

10.  Cetuximab hypersensitivity infusion reactions: Incidence and risk factors.

Authors:  Sarah Hopps; Patrick Medina; Shubham Pant; Ryan Webb; Meredith Moorman; Emily Borders
Journal:  J Oncol Pharm Pract       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 1.809

View more
  7 in total

1.  Assessment of cetuximab-induced infusion reactions and administration rechallenge at an academic medical center.

Authors:  Ellen Burke; Michelle Rockey; Dennis Grauer; Dave Henry; Prakash Neupane
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 2.  Balancing Safety and Efficacy of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitors in Patients With Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck.

Authors:  David J Iberri; A Dimitrios Colevas
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2015-10-07

3.  Retrospective analysis of premedication, glucocorticosteroids, and H1-antihistamines for preventing infusion reactions associated with cetuximab treatment of patients with head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Kiwako Ikegawa; Shinya Suzuki; Hisanaga Nomura; Tomohiro Enokida; Tomoko Yamazaki; Susumu Okano; Kazushi Endo; Shinichiro Saito; Masakazu Yamaguchi; Makoto Tahara
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 1.671

4.  High incidence of cetuximab-related infusion reactions in head and neck patients.

Authors:  Virginia Palomar Coloma; Pamela Bravo; Naima Lezghed; Lamia Mayache-Badis; Ruth Gabriela Herrera Gómez; Mariana Iacob; Laurence Nicouleau; Romain Desmaris; Yungan Tao; Cristian Leibu; Margarida Matias; Francois Lemare; Caroline Even; Maxime Annereau; Charles Ferté
Journal:  ESMO Open       Date:  2018-07-23

5.  Anaphylactoid hypersensitivity reaction from intra-arterial cetuximab: Clinical considerations and management.

Authors:  Yonatan Bardash; Tristan Tham; Caitlin Olson; Julian Khaymovich; Peter Costantino
Journal:  SAGE Open Med Case Rep       Date:  2019-01-12

Review 6.  Harnessing the Anti-Tumor Mediators in Mast Cells as a New Strategy for Adoptive Cell Transfer for Cancer.

Authors:  Mohammad Fereydouni; Mona Motaghed; Elnaz Ahani; Tal Kafri; Kristen Dellinger; Dean D Metcalfe; Christopher L Kepley
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 6.244

7.  Cetuximab for the treatment of locally advanced and recurrent/metastatic oral cancer: An investigation of distant metastasis.

Authors:  Tomofumi Naruse; Souichi Yanamoto; Yuki Matsushita; Yuki Sakamoto; Kota Morishita; Seigo Ohba; Takeshi Shiraishi; Shin-Ichi Yamada; Izumi Asahina; Masahiro Umeda
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-06-13
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.