Literature DB >> 20463570

Phenotypic alterations in myoepithelial cells associated with benign sclerosing lesions of the breast.

Justin B Hilson1, Stuart J Schnitt, Laura C Collins.   

Abstract

Myoepithelial cells surrounding spaces involved by ductal carcinoma in situ show phenotypic differences from normal myoepithelial cells. Myoepithelial cells are also present around entrapped glandular spaces in benign sclerosing lesions of the breast, but the immunophenotype of these myoepithelial cells has not been characterized. We evaluated myoepithelial cell immunophenotype in 48 benign sclerosing lesions using antibodies to 7 myoepithelial cell markers (smooth muscle actin, calponin, smooth muscle myosin heavy chain, p63, CD10, cytokeratin 5/6, and p75). Staining intensity of the myoepithelial cells surrounding entrapped glands was compared with that of myoepithelial cells surrounding normal ducts and lobules on the same section. When compared with normal breast ducts and lobules on the same slide, myoepithelial cells associated with benign sclerosing lesions showed reduced expression of cytokeratin 5/6 in 31.8% of cases, smooth muscle myosin heavy chain in 20.9%, CD10 in 15.2%, p63 in 9.3%, and calponin in 6.4%. In 15.9% of cases, myoepithelial cells surrounding entrapped glands showed complete absence of staining for cytokeratin 5/6. None of the cases showed reduced myoepithelial cell expression of smooth muscle actin or p75. The proportion of radial scars/complex sclerosing lesions and sclerosing adenosis with reduced expression was significantly different for CD10 (26.9% and 0% respectively; P=0.01) and p63 (17.4% and 0% respectively; P=0.05). We conclude that myoepithelial cells associated with benign sclerosing lesions of the breast may show immunophenotypic differences from normal myoepithelial cells. This needs to be taken into consideration when selecting myoepithelial markers to help distinguish benign sclerosing lesions from invasive breast cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20463570     DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e3181dd60d3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol        ISSN: 0147-5185            Impact factor:   6.394


  4 in total

1.  Consistency in recognizing microinvasion in breast carcinomas is improved by immunohistochemistry for myoepithelial markers.

Authors:  G Cserni; C A Wells; H Kaya; P Regitnig; A Sapino; G Floris; T Decker; M P Foschini; P J van Diest; D Grabau; A Reiner; J DeGaetano; E Chmielik; A Cordoba; X Andreu; V Zolota; E Charafe-Jauffret; A Ryska; Z Varga; N Weingertner; J P Bellocq; I Liepniece-Karele; G Callagy; J Kulka; H Bürger; P Figueiredo; J Wesseling; I Amendoeira; D Faverly; C M Quinn; S Bianchi
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 4.064

2.  Immunohistochemical expression of myoepithelial markers in adenomyoepithelioma of the breast: a unique paradoxical staining pattern of high-molecular weight cytokeratins.

Authors:  Suzuko Moritani; Shu Ichihara; Yasushi Yatabe; Masaki Hasegawa; Akari Iwakoshi; Waki Hosoda; Michihiko Narita; Yuichiro Nagai; Masami Asai; Nobuko Ujihira; Yoshiaki Yuba; Mayumi Jijiwa
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 4.064

3.  A deep learning model for breast ductal carcinoma in situ classification in whole slide images.

Authors:  Fahdi Kanavati; Shin Ichihara; Masayuki Tsuneki
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 4.064

4.  Infiltrating epitheliosis of the breast: characterization of histological features, immunophenotype and genomic profile.

Authors:  Carey A Eberle; Salvatore Piscuoglio; Emad A Rakha; Charlotte K Y Ng; Felipe C Geyer; Marcia Edelweiss; Rita A Sakr; Britta Weigelt; Jorge S Reis-Filho; Ian O Ellis
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 5.087

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.