Literature DB >> 492879

Perception of effort during constant work to self-imposed exhaustion.

D H Horstman, W P Morgan, A Cymerman, J Stokes.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to describe the pattern of change in effort sense and the value of this pattern in predicting work end-point at relatively high work intensity (80% VO2 max). The patterns of change of various physiological functions were also observed. Two modes of work (walking and running) were compared to ascertain generalizability of results. 26 healthy male volunteers served as subjects. Time to exhaustion (ET) did not differ between walking and running. As work continued during both tasks, significant increases of VE, VE/VO2, VE/VCO2 and HR and a significant decrease of ETCO2 were observed; while VO2 and R remained fairly constant. VO2 and VE during the run were about 5% greater than during the walk; there were no differences in other measures. Ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) from the Borg Scale were identical for both conditions, increasing in a near linear fashion from a value of 12.9 at 25% of total work time to 18.9 at exhaustion. Ratings obtained at 25 and 50% ET were extrapolated to time of exhaustion; the point of intercept corresponded to ratings of perceived exertion for maximal work. At exhaustion, subjects rated perception of respiratory exertion for the walk as less than that for the run; perception of leg exertion was not different for the two conditions. Plasma lactate, epinephrine and norepinephrine concentrations following exercise did not differ between the two conditions. The findings for the walking experiment were essentially replicated in a second investigation involving another 28 subjects. It is concluded that, with the exception of VO2 and some ventilatory parameters, walking and running at the same relative work intensity resulted in comparable perceptual and physiological responses. Psychophysical judgments made early during work were reasonably accurate predictors of exhaustion time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1979        PMID: 492879     DOI: 10.2466/pms.1979.48.3c.1111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Mot Skills        ISSN: 0031-5125


  13 in total

1.  Measurement frequency influences the rating of perceived exertion during sub-maximal treadmill running.

Authors:  Jo Corbett; Steve Vance; Mitch Lomax; Martin J Barwood
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Regulating intensity using perceived exertion: effect of exercise duration.

Authors:  Jie Kang; Edward C Chaloupka; Gregory B Biren; M Alysia Mastrangelo; Jay R Hoffman
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2008-11-12       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  The rate of increase in rating of perceived exertion predicts the duration of exercise to fatigue at a fixed power output in different environmental conditions.

Authors:  Helen Crewe; Ross Tucker; Timothy D Noakes
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2008-05-07       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Prediction of performance reduction in self-paced exercise as modulated by the rating of perceived exertion.

Authors:  Anthony E Iyoho; Lisa N MacFadden; Laurel J Ng
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2014-11-23       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Congruency and responsiveness of perceived exertion and time-to-end-point during an intermittent isometric fatigue task.

Authors:  Joseph Shepherd; Nigel Gleeson; Claire Minshull
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  Ratings of perceived exertion in individuals with varying fitness levels during walking and running.

Authors:  M J Berry; A S Weyrich; R A Robergs; K M Krause; C P Ingalls
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1989

Review 7.  A critical review of the literature on ratings scales for perceived exertion.

Authors:  R L Carton; E C Rhodes
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1985 May-Jun       Impact factor: 11.136

8.  Differentiated perceptions of exertion and energy cost of young women while carrying loads.

Authors:  R J Robertson; C J Caspersen; T G Allison; G S Skrinar; R A Abbott; K F Metz
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1982

9.  The limit to exercise tolerance in humans: mind over muscle?

Authors:  Samuele Maria Marcora; Walter Staiano
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-03-11       Impact factor: 3.078

10.  Blood glucose extraction as a mediator of perceived exertion during prolonged exercise.

Authors:  R J Robertson; R T Stanko; F L Goss; R J Spina; J J Reilly; K D Greenawalt
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1990
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.