Literature DB >> 20462415

Non-long terminal repeat (non-LTR) retrotransposons: mechanisms, recent developments, and unanswered questions.

Jeffrey S Han1.   

Abstract

Non-long terminal repeat (non-LTR) retrotransposons are present in most eukaryotic genomes. In some species, such as humans, these elements are the most abundant genome sequence and continue to replicate to this day, creating a source of endogenous mutations and potential genotoxic stress. This review will provide a general outline of the replicative cycle of non-LTR retrotransposons. Recent findings regarding the host regulation of non-LTR retrotransposons will be summarized. Finally, future directions of interest will be discussed.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID： 20462415      PMCID： PMC2881922          DOI： 10.1186/1759-8753-1-15

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mob DNA


  157 in total

1.  Essential motifs in the 3' untranslated region required for retrotransposition and the precise start of reverse transcription in non-long-terminal-repeat retrotransposon SART1.

Authors:  Mizuko Osanai; Hidekazu Takahashi; Kenji K Kojima; Mitsuhiro Hamada; Haruhiko Fujiwara
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  Human L1 retrotransposon encodes a conserved endonuclease required for retrotransposition.

Authors:  Q Feng; J V Moran; H H Kazazian; J D Boeke
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1996-11-29       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 3.  Cytosine methylation and the ecology of intragenomic parasites.

Authors:  J A Yoder; C P Walsh; T H Bestor
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 11.639

4.  DNA methylation of retrotransposon genes is regulated by Piwi family members MILI and MIWI2 in murine fetal testes.

Authors:  Satomi Kuramochi-Miyagawa; Toshiaki Watanabe; Kengo Gotoh; Yasushi Totoki; Atsushi Toyoda; Masahito Ikawa; Noriko Asada; Kanako Kojima; Yuka Yamaguchi; Takashi W Ijiri; Kenichiro Hata; En Li; Yoichi Matsuda; Tohru Kimura; Masaru Okabe; Yoshiyuki Sakaki; Hiroyuki Sasaki; Toru Nakano
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 11.361

5.  Chromatin-associated genes protect the yeast genome from Ty1 insertional mutagenesis.

Authors:  Katherine M Nyswaner; Mary Ann Checkley; Ming Yi; Robert M Stephens; David J Garfinkel
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Meiotic catastrophe and retrotransposon reactivation in male germ cells lacking Dnmt3L.

Authors:  Déborah Bourc'his; Timothy H Bestor
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-08-18       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  An endogenous small interfering RNA pathway in Drosophila.

Authors:  Benjamin Czech; Colin D Malone; Rui Zhou; Alexander Stark; Catherine Schlingeheyde; Monica Dus; Norbert Perrimon; Manolis Kellis; James A Wohlschlegel; Ravi Sachidanandam; Gregory J Hannon; Julius Brennecke
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-05-07       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Discrete small RNA-generating loci as master regulators of transposon activity in Drosophila.

Authors:  Julius Brennecke; Alexei A Aravin; Alexander Stark; Monica Dus; Manolis Kellis; Ravi Sachidanandam; Gregory J Hannon
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2007-03-08       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  The role of localization of bicoid RNA in organizing the anterior pattern of the Drosophila embryo.

Authors:  T Berleth; M Burri; G Thoma; D Bopp; S Richstein; G Frigerio; M Noll; C Nüsslein-Volhard
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 11.598

10.  APOBEC3A and APOBEC3B are potent inhibitors of LTR-retrotransposon function in human cells.

Authors:  Hal P Bogerd; Heather L Wiegand; Brian P Doehle; Kira K Lueders; Bryan R Cullen
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2006-01-10       Impact factor: 16.971
View more
  34 in total

1.  Processing and translation initiation of non-long terminal repeat retrotransposons by hepatitis delta virus (HDV)-like self-cleaving ribozymes.

Authors:  Dana J Ruminski; Chiu-Ho T Webb; Nathan J Riccitelli; Andrej Lupták
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 2.  Transposable elements and G-quadruplexes.

Authors:  Eduard Kejnovsky; Viktor Tokan; Matej Lexa
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 5.239

Review 3.  Back to the future: The intimate and evolving connection between telomere-related factors and genotoxic stress.

Authors:  Borja Barbero Barcenilla; Dorothy E Shippen
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  How dynamic could be the 45S rDNA cistron? An intriguing variability in a grasshopper species revealed by integration of chromosomal and genomic data.

Authors:  Ana B S M Ferretti; Francisco J Ruiz-Ruano; Diogo Milani; Vilma Loreto; Dardo A Martí; Erica Ramos; Cesar Martins; Diogo C Cabral-de-Mello
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 4.316

5.  First insight into divergence, representation and chromosome distribution of reverse transcriptase fragments from L1 retrotransposons in peanut and wild relative species.

Authors:  Sergio Sebastián Samoluk; Germán Robledo; Maricel Podio; Laura Chalup; Juan Pablo A Ortiz; Silvina Claudia Pessino; José Guillermo Seijo
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 1.082

Review 6.  Physiology of the read-write genome.

Authors:  James A Shapiro
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2014-06-01       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 7.  Reactivation of endogenous retroviral elements via treatment with DNMT- and HDAC-inhibitors.

Authors:  Michael Daskalakis; David Brocks; Yi-Hua Sheng; Md Saiful Islam; Alzbeta Ressnerova; Yassen Assenov; Till Milde; Ina Oehme; Olaf Witt; Ashish Goyal; Alexander Kühn; Mark Hartmann; Dieter Weichenhan; Manfred Jung; Christoph Plass
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 4.534

8.  LTR_retriever: A Highly Accurate and Sensitive Program for Identification of Long Terminal Repeat Retrotransposons.

Authors:  Shujun Ou; Ning Jiang
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 8.340

Review 9.  The group II intron maturase: a reverse transcriptase and splicing factor go hand in hand.

Authors:  Chen Zhao; Anna Marie Pyle
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 6.809

10.  MET canonical transcript expression is a predictive biomarker for chemo-sensitivity to MET-inhibitors in hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines.

Authors:  Wafaa M Rashed; Mohamed A Kandeil; Mohamed O Mahmoud; Doha Maher; Sameera Ezzat; Mohamed H Abdel-Rahman
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-09-26       Impact factor: 4.553
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.