Literature DB >> 20461455

Diagnostic imaging--evaluating image quality using visual grading characteristic (VGC) analysis.

Eberhard Ludewig1, Andreas Richter, Mairi Frame.   

Abstract

Radiologists are regularly faced with the task of comparing image quality obtained using different imaging systems or settings. Visual grading techniques can be used to evaluate the quality of images by grading the clarity of reproduction of anatomical or pathological structures. The methods, which include "visual grading analysis (VGA)" and the "image criteria (IC) study", are characterised by their attractive simplicity and reliability. Non-parametric rank-invariant statistical methods are suitable techniques for statistical analysis of VGA-data. Båth and Månsson (2007) introduced such a method and termed it "visual grading characteristics (VGC) analysis". This paper gives an overview of the principle together with an example of its use in veterinary radiology. The aim of this review article is to encourage veterinary researchers to apply this method which has proven valuable in the human field. Basically, the method can also be applied for the analysis of other categories of images (e.g. histological sections, cytological smears) in cases where the task is to evaluate features subjectively on the basis of a score, allowing some degree of freedom of decision. Furthermore, the aim of the investigation is not necessarily restricted to quality aspects. Other questions such as the effects of treatment options on the appearance of certain structures can be compared as well.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20461455     DOI: 10.1007/s11259-010-9413-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Res Commun        ISSN: 0165-7380            Impact factor:   2.459


  5 in total

1.  Digital radiography of scoliosis with a scanning method: initial evaluation.

Authors:  H Geijer; K Beckman; B Jonsson; T Andersson; J Persliden
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 2.  Visual grading characteristics (VGC) analysis: a non-parametric rank-invariant statistical method for image quality evaluation.

Authors:  M Båth; L G Månsson
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2006-07-19       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis: basic principles and applications in radiology.

Authors:  A R van Erkel; P M Pattynama
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 3.528

Review 4.  ROC methodology in radiologic imaging.

Authors:  C E Metz
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 6.016

5.  Measures of individual and group changes in ordered categorical data: application to the ADL staircase.

Authors:  U Sonn; E Svensson
Journal:  Scand J Rehabil Med       Date:  1997-12
  5 in total
  9 in total

1.  The effects of compression on the image quality of digital panoramic radiographs.

Authors:  Füsun Yasar; Esra Yesilova; Burcu Apaydın
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  A retrospective, semi-quantitative image quality analysis of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and MSCT in the diagnosis of distal radius fractures.

Authors:  H Lang; J Neubauer; B Fritz; E M Spira; J Strube; M Langer; E Kotter
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  The potential for reduced radiation dose from deep learning-based CT image reconstruction: A comparison with filtered back projection and hybrid iterative reconstruction using a phantom.

Authors:  Ji Eun Lee; Seo-Youn Choi; Jeong Ah Hwang; Sanghyeok Lim; Min Hee Lee; Boem Ha Yi; Jang Gyu Cha
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 1.889

4.  Visual grading characteristics and ordinal regression analysis during optimisation of CT head examinations.

Authors:  Francis Zarb; Mark F McEntee; Louise Rainford
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2014-12-16

5.  Needle-based storage-phosphor detector radiography is superior to a conventional powder-based storage phosphor detector and a high-resolution screen-film system in small patients (budgerigars and mice).

Authors:  Wiebke Tebrün; Eberhard Ludewig; Claudia Köhler; Julia Böhme; Michael Pees
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-11       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Comparison of T1wFLAIR and T1wTSE sequences in imaging the brain of small animals using high-field MRI.

Authors:  Chiara Bergamino; Séamus Hoey; Kenneth Waller; Cliona Skelly
Journal:  Ir Vet J       Date:  2019-07-06       Impact factor: 2.146

7.  Visual Evaluation of Image Quality of a Low Dose 2D/3D Slot Scanner Imaging System Compared to Two Conventional Digital Radiography X-ray Imaging Systems.

Authors:  Ahmed Jibril Abdi; Bo Mussmann; Alistair Mackenzie; Oke Gerke; Gitte Maria Jørgensen; Thor Eriksen Bechsgaard; Janni Jensen; Lone Brunshøj Olsen; Poul Erik Andersen
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-10-19

8.  Effect of x-ray energy on the radiological image quality in propagation-based phase-contrast computed tomography of the breast.

Authors:  Sarina Wan; Benedicta D Arhatari; Yakov I Nesterets; Sheridan C Mayo; Darren Thompson; Jane Fox; Beena Kumar; Zdenka Prodanovic; Daniel Hausermann; Anton Maksimenko; Christopher Hall; Matthew Dimmock; Konstantin M Pavlov; Darren Lockie; Mary Rickard; Ziba Gadomkar; Alaleh Aminzadeh; Elham Vafa; Andrew Peele; Harry M Quiney; Sarah Lewis; Timur E Gureyev; Patrick C Brennan; Seyedamir Tavakoli Taba
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2021-07-12

9.  Initial data from an experiment to implement a safe procedure to perform PA erect chest radiographs for COVID-19 patients with a mobile radiographic system in a "clean" zone of the hospital ward.

Authors:  L H Sng; L Arlany; L C Toh; T Y Loo; N S Ilzam; B S S Wong; L Lanca
Journal:  Radiography (Lond)       Date:  2020-05-31
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.