Literature DB >> 20461422

Design of a pragmatic approach to evaluate the effectiveness of concurrent treatment for the prevention of osteoporotic fractures: rationale, aims and organization of a Japanese Osteoporosis Intervention Trial (JOINT) initiated by the Research Group of Adequate Treatment of Osteoporosis (A-TOP).

Masataka Shiraki1, Tatsuhiko Kuroda, Nobuaki Miyakawa, Naohito Fujinawa, Kazumasa Tanzawa, Akiko Ishizuka, Shiro Tanaka, Yukari Tanaka, Takayuki Hosoi, Eiji Itoi, Shigeto Morimoto, Akira Itabashi, Toshitsugu Sugimoto, Toshihiko Yamashita, Itsuo Gorai, Satoshi Mori, Hideaki Kishimoto, Hideki Mizunuma, Naoto Endo, Yoshiki Nishizawa, Kunio Takaoka, Yasuo Ohashi, Hiroaki Ohta, Masao Fukunaga, Toshitaka Nakamura, Hajime Orimo.   

Abstract

The aim of osteoporosis treatment is to prevent future fractures. Although concurrent treatment has been used very frequently for osteoporosis in clinical practice, there are no data on accurate and verified effectiveness of concurrent treatment for fracture prevention in patients with osteoporosis. To clarify the clinical usefulness of concurrent treatment, the Japan Osteoporosis Society has authorized the establishment of the A-TOP (Adequate Treatment of Osteoporosis) research group. The objective of this research is to establish a design for a clinical trial to prove whether concurrent treatment using both alfacalcidol (1-alpha-hydroxycholecalciferol) and alendronate is more effective as compared to treatment using alendronate alone in terms of fracture prevention. The present study was named JOINT (Japanese Osteoporosis Intervention Trial) and is based on a method using national, prospective, randomized, open-labeled, blinded endpoints focusing on postmenopausal osteoporosis with a high risk for fracture. The patients were mainly selected by practitioners and allocated randomly by a central registration system into two groups, of which one received 5 mg/day of alendronate alone, and the other received 1 μg/day of 1-alpha-hydroxycholecalciferol (alfacalcidol) in addition to the alendronate. The endpoints focused primarily on fracture prevention, and the patients' quality of life (QOL) and change in body height, as well as adherence and the adverse events of the treatments were evaluated secondarily. To obtain sufficient statistical power in the events during a 2-year observation period, the patients who are expected to have higher risk were selected to participate in this study, and it was decided that the final plan would involve 890 patients per group (two-sided alpha = 0.05, power = 0.8). Data collection began in November 2003. Correspondence regarding the registration of the investigator and the progress of the study was conducted through a web system from the Public Health Research Foundation to practitioners.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20461422     DOI: 10.1007/s00774-010-0188-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab        ISSN: 0914-8779            Impact factor:   2.626


  22 in total

1.  Diagnostic criteria for primary osteoporosis: year 2000 revision.

Authors:  H Orimo; Y Hayashi; M Fukunaga; T Sone; S Fujiwara; M Shiraki; K Kushida; S Miyamoto; S Soen; J Nishimura; Y Oh-Hashi; T Hosoi; I Gorai; H Tanaka; T Igai; H Kishimoto
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Clinical trial registration: a statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.

Authors:  Catherine D DeAngelis; Jeffrey M Drazen; Frank A Frizelle; Charlotte Haug; John Hoey; Richard Horton; Sheldon Kotzin; Christine Laine; Ana Marusic; A John P M Overbeke; Torben V Schroeder; Hal C Sox; Martin B Van Der Weyden
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-09-08       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  The sample size required for intervention studies on fracture prevention can be decreased by using a bone resorption marker in the inclusion criteria: prospective study of a subset of the Nagano Cohort, on behalf of the Adequate Treatment of Osteoporosis (A-TOP) Research Group.

Authors:  Masataka Shiraki; Tatsuhiko Kuroda; Toshitaka Nakamura; Masao Fukunaga; Takayuki Hosoi; Hajime Orimo; Kuniyoshi Makino
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't.

Authors:  D L Sackett; W M Rosenberg; J A Gray; R B Haynes; W S Richardson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-01-13

5.  Effects of risedronate treatment on vertebral and nonvertebral fractures in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis: a randomized controlled trial. Vertebral Efficacy With Risedronate Therapy (VERT) Study Group.

Authors:  S T Harris; N B Watts; H K Genant; C D McKeever; T Hangartner; M Keller; C H Chesnut; J Brown; E F Eriksen; M S Hoseyni; D W Axelrod; P D Miller
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-10-13       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Reduction of vertebral fracture risk in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis treated with raloxifene: results from a 3-year randomized clinical trial. Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene Evaluation (MORE) Investigators.

Authors:  B Ettinger; D M Black; B H Mitlak; R K Knickerbocker; T Nickelsen; H K Genant; C Christiansen; P D Delmas; J R Zanchetta; J Stakkestad; C C Glüer; K Krueger; F J Cohen; S Eckert; K E Ensrud; L V Avioli; P Lips; S R Cummings
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-08-18       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Compliance with pharmacologic therapy for osteoporosis.

Authors:  Robert A Yood; Srinivas Emani; John I Reed; Barbara Edelman Lewis; Mary Charpentier; Eva Lydick
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-09-19       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Fracture outcomes related to persistence and compliance with oral bisphosphonates.

Authors:  Arlene M Gallagher; Stephan Rietbrock; Melvin Olson; Tjeerd P van Staa
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  Relationship of early changes in bone resorption to the reduction in fracture risk with risedronate.

Authors:  R Eastell; I Barton; R A Hannon; A Chines; P Garnero; P D Delmas
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Comparison of semiquantitative visual and quantitative morphometric assessment of prevalent and incident vertebral fractures in osteoporosis The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group.

Authors:  H K Genant; M Jergas; L Palermo; M Nevitt; R S Valentin; D Black; S R Cummings
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 6.741

View more
  9 in total

1.  Accuracy of the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool for judging pharmacotherapy initiation for primary osteoporosis.

Authors:  Hiroshi Fujimaki; Masamitsu Tomioka; Yuko Kanoshima; Akira Morita; Tetsuya Yamori; Yutaka Inaba
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 2.976

2.  Impact of communication between physicians and dentists on the incidence of jaw osteonecrosis caused by bone anti-resorptives.

Authors:  Sunday O Akintoye; Elliot V Hersh
Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 2.580

3.  Diagnostic criteria for primary osteoporosis: year 2012 revision.

Authors:  Satoshi Soen; Masao Fukunaga; Toshitsugu Sugimoto; Teruki Sone; Saeko Fujiwara; Naoto Endo; Itsuo Gorai; Masataka Shiraki; Hiroshi Hagino; Takayuki Hosoi; Hiroaki Ohta; Toshiyuki Yoneda; Tatsushi Tomomitsu
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  Comparison of expert and nonexpert physicians in the assessment of vertebral fractures using the semiquantitative method in Japan.

Authors:  Yukari Uemura; Nobuaki Miyakawa; Hajime Orimo; Masataka Shiraki; Toshitaka Nakamura; Satoshi Mori
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2014-10-10       Impact factor: 2.626

5.  Effects after starting or switching from bisphosphonate to romosozumab or denosumab in Japanese postmenopausal patients.

Authors:  Tomohiro Shimizu; Kosuke Arita; Eihiro Murota; Shigeto Hiratsuka; Ryo Fujita; Hotaka Ishizu; Tsuyoshi Asano; Daisuke Takahashi; Masahiko Takahata; Norimasa Iwasaki
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 2.626

6.  Denosumab versus romosozumab for postmenopausal osteoporosis treatment.

Authors:  Tomonori Kobayakawa; Akiko Miyazaki; Makoto Saito; Takako Suzuki; Jun Takahashi; Yukio Nakamura
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Real-world persistence of twice-weekly teriparatide and factors associated with the discontinuation in patients with osteoporosis.

Authors:  Ryo Fujita; Tsutomu Endo; Masahiko Takahata; Kentaro Haraya; Hisataka Suzuki; Itaru Oda; Masahiro Kanayama; Tsuyoshi Asano; Keiichi Shigenobu; Akira Iwata; Katsuhisa Yamada; Hirohito Takeuchi; Hisanori Ohura; Daisuke Yoneoka; Norimasa Iwasaki
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 2.976

8.  Effects of salubrinal on development of osteoclasts and osteoblasts from bone marrow-derived cells.

Authors:  Hiroki Yokota; Kazunori Hamamura; Andy Chen; Todd R Dodge; Nancy Tanjung; Aysan Abedinpoor; Ping Zhang
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Responsiveness of the Japanese Osteoporosis Quality of Life questionnaire in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Authors:  Hisashi Urushihara; Kousei Yoh; Etsuro Hamaya; Masanori Taketsuna; Kiyoshi Tanaka
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 3.186

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.