Literature DB >> 20461392

The changing role of pectoralis major flap in head and neck reconstruction.

Hin-Lun Liu1, Jimmy Yu-Wai Chan, William Ignace Wei.   

Abstract

Although pectoralis major flap (PM flap) has been used as the workhorse flap in head and neck reconstruction, its use in head and neck defects seems to fall out of favour in the era of free tissue transfer. The aim of this review is to find out the role of PM flap in modern head and neck surgery. Medical records of patients who underwent PM flap reconstruction for head and neck defect in our division were reviewed. The age, gender, flap type, indication and complication rate were described. Between January 1998 and December 2008, 202 PM flaps were used for head and neck reconstruction in 192 patients. In the early study period (1998-June 2003), out of the 119 PM flap reconstructions, 106 (89%) were performed for immediate reconstruction after resection of head and neck tumour, while 10 (8%) were performed as salvage procedures for complication after tumour resection e.g. failure of free flap, pharyngocutaneous fistula. In the late study period (July 2003-2008), out of the 83 PM flap reconstructions, 58 (70%) were performed for immediate reconstruction, while 24 (29%) were performed as salvage procedures. For immediate reconstruction after tumour extirpation, 51 flaps (48%) were performed for reconstruction of the tongue in the early study period, while only 14 (24%) were performed in the late study period. The number of PM flap used for immediate reconstruction for other head and neck defects remained relatively static throughout the two study periods. Over the study period, there were 10 (5%) cases of partial flap necrosis and 2 (1%) total flap loss, making the overall flap necrosis rate 6%. In the era of free tissue transfer, the role of PM flap in head and neck surgery has shifted from immediate reconstruction to salvage operation. However, PM flap still has an unique role in the repair of certain head and neck defects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20461392     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-010-1271-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  8 in total

1.  Complications of the pectoralis major myocutaneous flap in the oral cavity: a prospective evaluation of 220 cases.

Authors:  S Mehta; S Sarkar; N Kavarana; H Bhathena; A Mehta
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  Free radial forearm flap versus pectoralis major myocutaneous flap reconstruction of oral and oropharyngeal defects: a cost analysis.

Authors:  R de Bree; R Reith; J J Quak; C A Uyl-de Groot; M van Agthoven; C R Leemans
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.597

3.  Speech outcomes in Cantonese patients after glossectomy.

Authors:  Ripley Kit Wong; Esther Sok-Man Poon; Cynthia Yuen-Man Woo; Sabina Ching-Shun Chan; Elsa Siu-Ping Wong; Ada Wai-Sze Chu
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.147

4.  Pectoralis major myofascial flap: a valuable tool in contemporary head and neck reconstruction.

Authors:  R I Zbar; G F Funk; T M McCulloch; S M Graham; H T Hoffman
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 3.147

5.  The use of pedicled and free flaps in laryngeal cancer recurrences: postoperative considerations and functional results.

Authors:  Giulia Bertino; Roberto Spasiano; Isabella Mazzola; Marco Benazzo
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.539

6.  The pectoralis major myocutaneous flap. A versatile flap for reconstruction in the head and neck.

Authors:  S Ariyan
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 4.730

7.  Analysis of complications in 168 pectoralis major myocutaneous flaps used for head and neck reconstruction.

Authors:  S S Kroll; H Goepfert; M Jones; O Guillamondegui; M Schusterman
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 1.539

8.  Functional comparison after reconstruction with a radial forearm free flap or a pectoralis major flap for cancer of the tongue.

Authors:  Wan-Fu Su; Yi-Jan Hsia; Yen-Chine Chang; Shyi-Gen Chen; Hwa Sheng
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.497

  8 in total
  5 in total

1.  Expert's comment concerning grand rounds case entitled ''postoperative pharyngocutaneous fistula: treated with sternocleidomastoid flap repair and cricopharyngeus myotomy'' (by V.A. Iyoob).

Authors:  Nigel Beasley
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-09-22       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  [Renaissance of pedicled flaps in oral and maxillofacial surgery].

Authors:  M Twieg; W Reich; R Dempf; A W Eckert
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  Middle and Lower Face Soft Tissue Reconstruction: A 10-Year Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Patiguli Wusiman; Julaiti Tuerxun; Wang Ling; Maimaitituerxun Tuerdi; Abudukelimujiang Maimaiti; Yao Zhi Tao; Adilijiang Saimait; Ainiwaer Mijiti; Adili Moming
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2015-12-15

Review 4.  Contemporary role of pectoralis major regional flaps in head and neck surgery.

Authors:  F Bussu; R Gallus; V Navach; R Bruschini; M Tagliabue; G Almadori; G Paludetti; L Calabrese
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.124

5.  Management of refractory cervical anastomotic fistula after esophagectomy using the pectoralis major myocutaneous flap.

Authors:  Lifei Deng; Yan Li; Weixiong Li; Muyuan Liu; Shaowei Xu; Hanwei Peng
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-06-15
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.