Literature DB >> 12646846

Functional comparison after reconstruction with a radial forearm free flap or a pectoralis major flap for cancer of the tongue.

Wan-Fu Su1, Yi-Jan Hsia, Yen-Chine Chang, Shyi-Gen Chen, Hwa Sheng.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Numerous patients in Taiwan with tongue carcinoma require tongue reconstruction. We compared the abilities of 2 methods of tongue reconstruction to reserve tongue function. STUDY DESIGN AND
SETTING: Sixty patients underwent resection of the tumors and reconstruction with a pectoralis major flap or a radial forearm flap. The Chinese articulation test was used to evaluate the place and manner of error production, and a questionnaire on dietary habits was used to evaluate deglutition 6 months to 10 years after reconstruction.
RESULTS: Patients with the free flap had more intelligible speech. The questionnaire study showed no significant difference between the 2 groups in swallowing rating. Motility caused by flap pliability increased speech intelligibility more than it did on swallowing function.
CONCLUSION: Our experience in a few selected patients shows that the functional outcome of tongue surgery is related to the reconstruction methods used (for speech) and to the extent of tongue resection (for swallowing).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12646846     DOI: 10.1067/mhn.2003.38

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0194-5998            Impact factor:   3.497


  14 in total

1.  Quality of life in patients after reconstruction with the supraclavicular artery island flap (SCAIF) versus the radial free forearm flap (RFFF).

Authors:  Jennifer L Spiegel; Yiannis Pilavakis; Bernhard G Weiss; Martin Canis; Christian Welz
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-05-27       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Free tissue transfer versus pedicled flap reconstruction of head and neck malignancy defects.

Authors:  J P O'Neill; N Shine; P A Eadie; E Beausang; C Timon
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2010-02-12       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 3.  Imaging of Surgical Free Flaps in Head and Neck Reconstruction.

Authors:  J L McCarty; A S Corey; M W El-Deiry; H M Baddour; B M Cavazuti; P A Hudgins
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Compensatory Mechanisms in Patients After a Partial or Total Glossectomy due to Oral Cancer.

Authors:  Ludmiła Halczy-Kowalik; Andrzej Wiktor; Anna Rzewuska; Robert Kowalczyk; Rościsław Wysocki; Violetta Posio
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 3.438

5.  The changing role of pectoralis major flap in head and neck reconstruction.

Authors:  Hin-Lun Liu; Jimmy Yu-Wai Chan; William Ignace Wei
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Functional results of speech and swallowing after oral microvascular free flap reconstruction.

Authors:  Maria Archontaki; Athanasios Athanasiou; Spyros D Stavrianos; Dimitris P Korkolis; Gregory Faratzis; Flora Papadopoulou; Georgios Kokkalis; Alexander D Rapidis
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-05-21       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Infrahyoid myofascial flap for tongue reconstruction.

Authors:  Jochen P Windfuhr; Stephan Remmert
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2006-07-26       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Rehabilitation of dysphagia following head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Barbara R Pauloski
Journal:  Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.784

Review 9.  Outcome measurements after oral cancer treatment: speech and speech-related aspects--an overview.

Authors:  M Schuster; F Stelzle
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2012-08-03

10.  Current management of advanced resectable oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Thomas J Ow; Jeffrey N Myers
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 3.372

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.