Literature DB >> 20461363

Healthy volunteers and early phases of clinical experimentation.

Giuseppe Pasqualetti1, Giovanni Gori, Corrado Blandizzi, Mario Del Tacca.   

Abstract

The main goal of early phase trials is to gain knowledge about the clinical suitability of novel compounds, without pursuing specific therapeutic purposes. Healthy volunteers usually represent the ideal model for conducting phase I clinical trials, in order to investigate pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics as well as to document safety and tolerability without interference by concomitant pathological conditions. The increasing cost of novel drug development, in conjunction with ethical considerations, has fostered a new procedure for first-in-man trials, designated as "phase 0," which is conducted very early on a limited number of healthy volunteers who are exposed to low drug levels. The present review discusses issues concerning the enrollment of healthy volunteers in the early phase of drug development from different points of view, with some focus on the Italian experience. From the ethical standpoint, much discussion revolves around payments to healthy volunteers. Most authors agree that an adequate remuneration must be provided to healthy subjects, while avoiding coercion and excessive psychological pressure. Pending the lack of international and national guidelines, our center for clinical drug experimentation has implemented an operative procedure to estimate payments for healthy volunteers based on specific items, including restriction, time spent, discomfort, and risk. Other unresolved issues about the recruitment of healthy volunteers are represented by the lack of international consensus on the definition of healthy status and the need for guidelines about advertisement on clinical trials addressed to potential participants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20461363     DOI: 10.1007/s00228-010-0827-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0031-6970            Impact factor:   2.953


  19 in total

1.  Payment of research subjects: a broader perspective.

Authors:  J M Sears
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 11.229

2.  Research involving the homeless: arguments against payment-in-kind (PinK).

Authors:  Toby L Schonfeld; Joseph S Brown; Meaghann Weniger; Bruce Gordon
Journal:  IRB       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct

3.  How first-time-in-human studies are being performed: a survey of phase I dose-escalation trials in healthy volunteers published between 1995 and 2004.

Authors:  Camilla Buoen; Ole J Bjerrum; Mikael S Thomsen
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.126

4.  Clinical research subject recruitment: the Volunteer for Vanderbilt Research Program www.volunteer.mc.vanderbilt.edu.

Authors:  Paul A Harris; Lynda Lane; Italo Biaggioni
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2005-07-27       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 5.  Establishing risk of human experimentation with drugs: lessons from TGN1412.

Authors:  M J H Kenter; A F Cohen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2006-10-14       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Recruiting healthy volunteers for research participation via internet advertising.

Authors:  Katrina A Bramstedt
Journal:  Clin Med Res       Date:  2007-06

7.  Lack of pharmacokinetic bioequivalence between generic and branded amoxicillin formulations. A post-marketing clinical study on healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Mario Del Tacca; Giuseppe Pasqualetti; Antonello Di Paolo; Agostino Virdis; Gabriele Massimetti; Giovanni Gori; Daniele Versari; Stefano Taddei; Corrado Blandizzi
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.335

8.  An analysis of U.S. practices of paying research participants.

Authors:  Christine Grady; Neal Dickert; Tom Jawetz; Gary Gensler; Ezekiel Emanuel
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2005-03-28       Impact factor: 2.226

9.  Increasing the amount of payment to research subjects.

Authors:  David B Resnik; D B Resnick
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.903

10.  Research on healthy volunteers. A report of the Royal College of Physicians.

Authors: 
Journal:  J R Coll Physicians Lond       Date:  1986-10
View more
  13 in total

1.  Change in tumor size by RECIST correlates linearly with overall survival in phase I oncology studies.

Authors:  Rajul K Jain; J Jack Lee; Chaan Ng; David Hong; Jing Gong; Aung Naing; Jennifer Wheler; Razelle Kurzrock
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-06-11       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Gendered Logics of Biomedical Research: Women in U.S. Phase I Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Marci D Cottingham; Jill A Fisher
Journal:  Soc Probl       Date:  2020-10-11

3.  Normative Values for the Unsupported Upper Limb Exercise Test and 6-Minute Pegboard and Ring Test in Healthy Canadian Adults.

Authors:  Vanessa Pereira Lima; Dina Brooks; Stacey Konidis; Tamara Araújo; Giane Amorim Ribeiro-Samora; Roger Goldstein; Tania Janaudis-Ferreira
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 1.037

4.  Clinical, ethical and financial implications of incidental imaging findings: experience from a phase I trial in healthy elderly volunteers.

Authors:  David J Pinato; Chara Stavraka; Mark Tanner; Audrey Esson; Eric W Jacobson; Martin R Wilkins; Vincenzo Libri
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Comparative pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation of branded and generic formulations of meloxicam in healthy male volunteers.

Authors:  Mario Del Tacca; Giuseppe Pasqualetti; Giovanni Gori; Pasquale Pepe; Antonello Di Paolo; Marianna Lastella; Ferdinando De Negri; Corrado Blandizzi
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 2.423

Review 6.  Unveiling changes in the landscape of patient populations in cancer early drug development.

Authors:  Cinta Hierro; Analía Azaro; Guillem Argilés; Elena Elez; Patricia Gómez; Joan Carles; Jordi Rodon
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-02-21

Review 7.  Reviewing the role of healthy volunteer studies in drug development.

Authors:  Joyson J Karakunnel; Nam Bui; Latha Palaniappan; Keith T Schmidt; Kenneth W Mahaffey; Briggs Morrison; William D Figg; Shivaani Kummar
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 5.531

8.  Modulation of premotor cortex response to sequence motor learning during escitalopram intake.

Authors:  Eóin N Molloy; Karsten Mueller; Nathalie Beinhölzl; Maria Blöchl; Fabian A Piecha; André Pampel; Christopher J Steele; Ulrike Scharrer; Gergana Zheleva; Ralf Regenthal; Bernhard Sehm; Vadim V Nikulin; Harald E Möller; Arno Villringer; Julia Sacher
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 6.200

9.  Incidental diagnosis in healthy clinical trial subjects.

Authors:  Christopher J A Duncan; Rosalind Rowland; Patrick J Lillie; Joel Meyer; Susanne H Sheehy; Geraldine A O'Hara; Matthew Hamill; Hannah Donaldson; Laura Dinsmore; Ian D Poulton; Sarah C Gilbert; Helen McShane; Adrian V S Hill
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 4.689

Review 10.  The use of GA-RxODE (Genetics Algorithms and Running simulations from Ordinary Differential Equations-based model) method to optimize bioequivalence studies.

Authors:  Ezequiel Omar Nuske; Mikhail Morozov; Héctor Alejandro Serra
Journal:  Pharmacol Res Perspect       Date:  2021-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.