Literature DB >> 20461040

Regional Myosin heavy chain distribution in selected paraspinal muscles.

Gilad J Regev1, Choll W Kim, Bryan E Thacker, Akihito Tomiya, Steven R Garfin, Samuel R Ward, Richard L Lieber.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study with repeated measures design.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the myosin heavy-chain isoform distribution within and between paraspinal muscles and to test the theory that fiber-type gradients exist as a function of paraspinal muscle depth. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There is still uncertainty regarding the fiber-type distributions within different paraspinal muscles. It has been previously proposed that deep fibers of the multifidus muscle may contain a higher ratio of type I to type II fibers, because, unlike superficial fibers, they primarily stabilize the spine, and may therefore have relatively higher endurance. Using a minimally invasive surgical approach, using tubular retractors that are placed within anatomic intermuscular planes, it was feasible to obtain biopsies from the multifidus, longissimus, iliocostalis, and psoas muscles at specific predefined depths.
METHODS: Under an institutional review board-approved protocol, muscle biopsies were obtained from 15 patients who underwent minimally invasive spinal surgery, using the posterior paramedian (Wiltse) approach or the minimally invasive lateral approach. Myosin heavy chain (MyHC) isoform distribution was analyzed using SDS-PAGE (sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis) electrophoresis. Because multiple biopsies were obtained from each patient, MyHC distribution was compared using both within- and between-muscle repeated measures analyses.
RESULTS: The fiber-type distribution was similar among the posterior paraspinal muscles and was composed of relatively high percentage of type I (63%), compared to type IIA (19%) and type IIX (18%) fibers. In contrast, the psoas muscle was found to contain a lower percentage of type I fibers (42%) and a higher percentage of type IIA (33%) and IIX fibers (26%; P<0.05). No significant difference was found for fiber-type distribution among 3 different depths of themultifidus and psoas muscles.
CONCLUSION: Fiber-type distribution between the posterior paraspinal muscles is consistent and is composed of relatively high percentage of type I fibers, consistent with a postural function. The psoas muscle, on the other hand, is composed of a higher percentage of type II fibers such as in the appendicular muscles. Our data do not support the idea of a fiber-type gradient as a function of depth for any muscle studied.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20461040      PMCID: PMC2947743          DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181bfcd98

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  32 in total

1.  Deep and superficial fibers of the lumbar multifidus muscle are differentially active during voluntary arm movements.

Authors:  G Lorimer Moseley; Paul W Hodges; Simon C Gandevia
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  The stabilizing system of the spine. Part I. Function, dysfunction, adaptation, and enhancement.

Authors:  M M Panjabi
Journal:  J Spinal Disord       Date:  1992-12

Review 3.  The lumbar multifidus: does the evidence support clinical beliefs?

Authors:  David A MacDonald; G Lorimer Moseley; Paul W Hodges
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  2006-05-23

4.  Fibre type characteristics of the lumbar paraspinal muscles in normal healthy subjects and in patients with low back pain.

Authors:  A F Mannion; B R Weber; J Dvorak; D Grob; M Müntener
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 3.494

5.  Electrophoretic separation of rat skeletal muscle myosin heavy-chain isoforms.

Authors:  R J Talmadge; R R Roy
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1993-11

6.  Muscle fiber type distribution in multifidus muscle in cases of lumbar disc herniation.

Authors:  S Bajek; D Bobinac; G Bajek; T S Vranić; B Lah; D M Dragojević
Journal:  Acta Med Okayama       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 0.892

7.  Repetitive lifting tasks fatigue the back muscles and increase the bending moment acting on the lumbar spine.

Authors:  P Dolan; M A Adams
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Muscle fiber distribution, capillary density, and enzymatic activities in the lumbar paravertebral muscles of young men. Significance for isometric endurance.

Authors:  K Jørgensen; T Nicholaisen; M Kato
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1993-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Analysis of vertebral muscle obtained during surgery for correction of a lumbar disc disorder.

Authors:  D Ford; K M Bagnall; K D McFadden; B Greenhill; J Raso
Journal:  Acta Anat (Basel)       Date:  1983

10.  Benefits of the paraspinal muscle-sparing approach versus the conventional midline approach for posterior nonfusion stabilization: comparative analysis of clinical and functional outcomes.

Authors:  Neel Anand; Eli M Baron; Robert S Bray
Journal:  SAS J       Date:  2007-08-01
View more
  8 in total

1.  Severe neuromuscular denervation of clinically relevant muscles in a mouse model of spinal muscular atrophy.

Authors:  Karen K Y Ling; Rebecca M Gibbs; Zhihua Feng; Chien-Ping Ko
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 6.150

2.  Human skeletal muscle biochemical diversity.

Authors:  Timothy F Tirrell; Mark S Cook; J Austin Carr; Evie Lin; Samuel R Ward; Richard L Lieber
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Cell populations and muscle fiber morphology associated with acute and chronic muscle degeneration in lumbar spine pathology.

Authors:  Bahar Shahidi; Michael C Gibbons; Mary Esparza; Vinko Zlomislic; Richard Todd Allen; Steven R Garfin; Samuel R Ward
Journal:  JOR Spine       Date:  2020-04-08

4.  Age-related changes in trunk muscle activity and spinal and lower limb kinematics during gait.

Authors:  Rebecca Crawford; Leonardo Gizzi; Angela Dieterich; Áine Ni Mhuiris; Deborah Falla
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Clinical Decision-Making in Chronic Spine Pain: Dilemma of Image-Based Diagnosis of Degenerative Spine and Generation Mechanisms for Nociceptive, Radicular, and Referred Pain.

Authors:  Haytham Eloqayli
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Abdominal myosteatosis is independently associated with hyperinsulinemia and insulin resistance among older men without diabetes.

Authors:  Iva Miljkovic; Jane A Cauley; Patty Y Wang; Kathleen F Holton; Christine G Lee; Yahtyng Sheu; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; Andrew R Hoffman; Cora B Lewis; Eric S Orwoll; Marcia L Stefanick; Elsa S Strotmeyer; Lynn M Marshall
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 5.002

7.  Mitochondrial DNA deletions and depletion within paraspinal muscles.

Authors:  G R Campbell; A Reeve; I Ziabreva; T M Polvikoski; R W Taylor; R Reynolds; D M Turnbull; D J Mahad
Journal:  Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 8.090

8.  Regional differences between superficial and deep lumbar multifidus in patients with chronic lumbar spine pathology.

Authors:  Jennifer Padwal; David B Berry; James C Hubbard; Vinko Zlomislic; R Todd Allen; Steven R Garfin; Samuel R Ward; Bahar Shahidi
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 2.362

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.