Literature DB >> 20461038

Validation of an adaptation of the stress process model for predicting low back pain related long-term disability outcomes: a cohort study.

Manon Truchon1, Denis Côté, Marie-Eve Schmouth, Jean Leblond, Lise Fillion, Clermont Dionne.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Twelve-month cohort study.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to examine the ability of an adaptation of the stress process model to predict different outcomes among low back pain (LBP) sufferers. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Recently, the stress process model was adapted and was shown to be useful to partially explain long-term disability related to low back pain, an important occupational health problem.
METHODS: French-speaking compensated workers on sick leave because of subacute common LBP (N=439) completed a questionnaire including the adapted stress process model's factors: life events and appraisal, cognitive appraisal of LBP, emotional distress, avoidance coping strategies, and functional disability. Six and 12 months later, participants gave information about their work status, number of days of absence, and functional disability. Regression analyses were performed to identify significant predictive factors of these outcomes. Pain intensity, fear of work, gender, and presence of pain radiating below the knee were used as control variables.
RESULTS: Number of days of absence, functional disability, and absence from work were predicted at 6 and 12 months by cognitive appraisal of LBP and emotional distress. Functional disability was predicted in addition by functional disability at study entry (T1). When the control variables were considered, number of days of absence was predicted at 6 months by cognitive appraisal, fear of work, and being a male, and, in addition, by emotional distress at 12 months. Functional disability was predicted by functional disability t1, emotional distress, cognitive appraisal of LBP, and fear of work at 6 months, and by the same factors and variables at 12 months, except for functional disability t1. Regarding absence from work, it was predicted at 6 months by fear of work and being a male, and at 12 months by cognitive appraisal of LBP and fear of work.
CONCLUSION: In association with fear of work, 2 factors from the adapted stress process model are significantly useful for predicting LBP related long-term disability outcomes and could be targeted by preventive interventions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20461038     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181c03d06

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  8 in total

1.  Absenteeism screening questionnaire (ASQ): a new tool for predicting long-term absenteeism among workers with low back pain.

Authors:  Manon Truchon; Marie-Ève Schmouth; Denis Côté; Lise Fillion; Michel Rossignol; Marie-José Durand
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2012-03

2.  Nuclear magnetic resonance therapy in lumbar disc herniation with lumbar radicular syndrome: effects of the intervention on pain intensity, health-related quality of life, disease-related disability, consumption of pain medication, duration of sick leave and MRI analysis.

Authors:  H Salfinger; G Salomonowitz; K M Friedrich; J Hahne; J Holzapfel; M Friedrich
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-10-18       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Predictive ability of a modified Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire in an acute/subacute low back pain working population.

Authors:  Charles Philip Gabel; Markus Melloh; Michael Yelland; Brendan Burkett; Anne Roiko
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Development of Prediction Models for Sick Leave Due to Musculoskeletal Disorders.

Authors:  Lisa C Bosman; Corné A M Roelen; Jos W R Twisk; Iris Eekhout; Martijn W Heymans
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2019-09

5.  Characteristics of coping strategies for dysesthesia in preoperative patients with compressive cervical myelopathy.

Authors:  Daisuke Higuchi
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2014-08-19

Review 6.  Systematic Review of Prognostic Factors for Return to Work in Workers with Sub Acute and Chronic Low Back Pain.

Authors:  Ivan A Steenstra; Claire Munhall; Emma Irvin; Nelson Oranye; Steven Passmore; Dwayne Van Eerd; Quenby Mahood; Sheilah Hogg-Johnson
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2017-09

Review 7.  Person-related factors associated with work participation in employees with health problems: a systematic review.

Authors:  Mariska de Wit; Haije Wind; Carel T J Hulshof; Monique H W Frings-Dresen
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 3.015

8.  Stress and Self-Efficacy as Long-Term Predictors for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Prospective Longitudinal Study.

Authors:  Anne-Katrin Puschmann; David Drießlein; Heidrun Beck; Adamantios Arampatzis; Maria Moreno Catalá; Marcus Schiltenwolf; Frank Mayer; Pia-Maria Wippert
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 3.133

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.