Literature DB >> 30607694

Development of Prediction Models for Sick Leave Due to Musculoskeletal Disorders.

Lisa C Bosman1,2, Corné A M Roelen3,4,5, Jos W R Twisk3, Iris Eekhout3,6, Martijn W Heymans3.   

Abstract

Purpose The aim of this study was to develop prediction models to determine the risk of sick leave due to musculoskeletal disorders (MSD) in non-sick listed employees and to compare models for short-term (i.e., 3 months) and long-term (i.e., 12 months) predictions. Methods Cohort study including 49,158 Dutch employees who participated in occupational health checks between 2009 and 2015 and sick leave data recorded during 12 months follow-up. Prediction models for MSD sick leave within 3 and 12 months after the health check were developed with logistic regression analysis using routinely assessed health check variables. The performance of the prediction models was evaluated with explained variance (Nagelkerke's R-square), calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow test) and discrimination (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, AUC) measures. Results A total of 376 (0.8%) and 1193 (2.4%) employees had MSD sick leave within 3 and 12 months after the health check. The prediction models included similar predictor variables (educational level, musculoskeletal complaints, distress, supervisor social support, work-home interference, intrinsic motivation, development opportunities, and work pace). The explained variances were 7.6% and 8.8% for the model with 3 and 12 months follow-up, respectively. Both prediction models showed adequate calibration and discriminated between employees with and without MSD sick leave 3 months (AUC = 0.761; Interquartile range [IQR] 0.759-0.763) and 12 months (AUC = 0.740; IQR 0.738-0.741) after the health check. Conclusion The prediction models could be used to determine the risk of MSD sick leave in non-sick listed employees and invite them to preventive consultations with occupational health providers.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Absenteeism; Musculoskeletal disease; Prediction models; Prognostic research; Risk assessment

Year:  2019        PMID: 30607694     DOI: 10.1007/s10926-018-09825-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Rehabil        ISSN: 1053-0487


  30 in total

1.  Simplifying a prognostic model: a simulation study based on clinical data.

Authors:  Gareth Ambler; Anthony R Brady; Patrick Royston
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2002-12-30       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Different risk factors for musculoskeletal complaints and musculoskeletal sickness absence.

Authors:  W IJzelenberg; Duco Molenaar; Alex Burdorf
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.024

3.  Careful use of pseudo R-squared measures in epidemiological studies.

Authors:  Harald Heinzl; Thomas Waldhör; Martina Mittlböck
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2005-09-30       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Risk factors for sick leave due to musculoskeletal disorders among self-employed Dutch farmers: a case-control study.

Authors:  Esther Hartman; Huub H E Oude Vrielink; Ruud B M Huirne; Jos H M Metz
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.214

5.  A prospective study of psychosocial risk factors and absence due to musculoskeletal disorders--implications for occupational screening.

Authors:  Serena Bartys; Kim Burton; Chris Main
Journal:  Occup Med (Lond)       Date:  2005-04-12       Impact factor: 1.611

6.  Work factors as predictors of intense or disabling low back pain; a prospective study of nurses' aides.

Authors:  W Eriksen; D Bruusgaard; S Knardahl
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.402

7.  Work and family support systems and the prevalence of lower back problems in a South African steel industry.

Authors:  Bernard van Vuuren; Evert Zinzen; Hendrik J van Heerden; Piet J Becker; Romain Meeusen
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2007-07-18

8.  The Four-Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire (4DSQ): a validation study of a multidimensional self-report questionnaire to assess distress, depression, anxiety and somatization.

Authors:  Berend Terluin; Harm W J van Marwijk; Herman J Adèr; Henrica C W de Vet; Brenda W J H Penninx; Marleen L M Hermens; Christine A van Boeijen; Anton J L M van Balkom; Jac J L van der Klink; Wim A B Stalman
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2006-08-22       Impact factor: 3.630

9.  Risk factors for sickness absence due to low back pain and prognostic factors for return to work in a cohort of shipyard workers.

Authors:  Evangelos C Alexopoulos; Eleni C Konstantinou; Giorgos Bakoyannis; Dimitra Tanagra; Alex Burdorf
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-07-23       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Work-related physical and psychosocial risk factors for sick leave in patients with neck or upper extremity complaints.

Authors:  Sandra D M Bot; Caroline B Terwee; Daniëlle A W M van der Windt; Allard J van der Beek; Lex M Bouter; Joost Dekker
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2007-04-05       Impact factor: 3.015

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Data Science Methods for Nursing-Relevant Patient Outcomes and Clinical Processes: The 2019 Literature Year in Review.

Authors:  Mary Anne Schultz; Rachel Lane Walden; Kenrick Cato; Cynthia Peltier Coviak; Christopher Cruz; Fabio D'Agostino; Brian J Douthit; Thompson Forbes; Grace Gao; Mikyoung Angela Lee; Deborah Lekan; Ann Wieben; Alvin D Jeffery
Journal:  Comput Inform Nurs       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 1.985

2.  Predicting Long-Term Sickness Absence and Identifying Subgroups Among Individuals Without an Employment Contract.

Authors:  Ilse Louwerse; H Jolanda van Rijssen; Maaike A Huysmans; Allard J van der Beek; Johannes R Anema
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2020-09

3.  Workplace musculoskeletal problems in occupational therapy students.

Authors:  Joanne Morabito; Stefania Penkala; Kristy Coxon
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 3.295

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.