BACKGROUND: England's National Chlamydia Screening Programme (NCSP) provides opportunistic testing for under 25 year-olds in healthcare and non-healthcare settings. The authors aimed to explore relationships between coverage and positivity in relation to demographic characteristics or setting, in order to inform efficient and sustainable implementation of the NCSP. METHODS: The authors analysed mapped NCSP testing data from the South East region of England between April 2006 and March 2007 inclusive to population characteristics. Coverage was estimated by sex, demographic characteristics and service characteristics, and variation in positivity by setting and population group. RESULTS: Coverage in females was lower in the least deprived areas compared with the most deprived areas (OR 0.48; 95% CI 0.45 to 0.50). Testing rates were lower in 20-24-year-olds compared with 15-19-year-olds (OR 0.69; 95% CI 0.67 to 0.72 for females and OR 0.67; 95% CI 0.64 to 0.71 for males), but positivity was higher in older males. Females were tested most often in healthcare services, which also identified the most positives. The greatest proportions of male tests were in university (27%) and military (19%) settings which only identified a total of 11% and 13% of total male positives respectively. More chlamydia-positive males were identified through healthcare services despite fewer numbers of tests. CONCLUSIONS: Testing of males focused on institutional settings where there is a low yield of positives, and limited capacity for expansion. By contrast, the testing of females, especially in urban environments, was mainly through established healthcare services. Future strategies should prioritise increasing male testing in healthcare settings.
BACKGROUND: England's National Chlamydia Screening Programme (NCSP) provides opportunistic testing for under 25 year-olds in healthcare and non-healthcare settings. The authors aimed to explore relationships between coverage and positivity in relation to demographic characteristics or setting, in order to inform efficient and sustainable implementation of the NCSP. METHODS: The authors analysed mapped NCSP testing data from the South East region of England between April 2006 and March 2007 inclusive to population characteristics. Coverage was estimated by sex, demographic characteristics and service characteristics, and variation in positivity by setting and population group. RESULTS: Coverage in females was lower in the least deprived areas compared with the most deprived areas (OR 0.48; 95% CI 0.45 to 0.50). Testing rates were lower in 20-24-year-olds compared with 15-19-year-olds (OR 0.69; 95% CI 0.67 to 0.72 for females and OR 0.67; 95% CI 0.64 to 0.71 for males), but positivity was higher in older males. Females were tested most often in healthcare services, which also identified the most positives. The greatest proportions of male tests were in university (27%) and military (19%) settings which only identified a total of 11% and 13% of total male positives respectively. More chlamydia-positive males were identified through healthcare services despite fewer numbers of tests. CONCLUSIONS: Testing of males focused on institutional settings where there is a low yield of positives, and limited capacity for expansion. By contrast, the testing of females, especially in urban environments, was mainly through established healthcare services. Future strategies should prioritise increasing male testing in healthcare settings.
Authors: John M Saunders; Catherine H Mercer; Lorna J Sutcliffe; Graham J Hart; Jackie Cassell; Claudia S Estcourt Journal: Sex Transm Infect Date: 2012-04-17 Impact factor: 3.519
Authors: Dominik Zenner; Darko Molinar; Tom Nichols; Johanna Riha; Mary Macintosh; Anthony Nardone Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2012-04-02 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Sebastian S Fuller; Catherine H Mercer; Andrew J Copas; John Saunders; Lorna J Sutcliffe; Jackie A Cassell; Graham Hart; Anne M Johnson; Tracy E Roberts; Louise J Jackson; Pamela Muniina; Claudia S Estcourt Journal: Sex Transm Infect Date: 2014-12-15 Impact factor: 3.519
Authors: Natalie Edelman; Jackie A Cassell; Richard de Visser; Philip Prah; Catherine H Mercer Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2017-01-04 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Joanna Crichton; Matthew Hickman; Rona Campbell; Harriet Batista-Ferrer; John Macleod Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2015-07-30 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Sarah C Woodhall; Kate Soldan; Pam Sonnenberg; Catherine H Mercer; Soazig Clifton; Pamela Saunders; Filomeno da Silva; Sarah Alexander; Kaye Wellings; Clare Tanton; Nigel Field; Andrew J Copas; Catherine A Ison; Anne M Johnson Journal: Sex Transm Infect Date: 2015-08-19 Impact factor: 3.519