Literature DB >> 20460069

Histological differences in iliac and tibial bone graft.

Christopher P Chiodo1, Jochen Hahne, Michael G Wilson, Julie Glowacki.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cancellous bone graft is frequently used during orthopedic procedures. While the iliac crest has traditionally been the most common donor site, the proximal tibia is an alternative donor site, especially for foot and ankle procedures. This study tested the null hypothesis that the histologic composition of iliac and tibial bone grafts is similar.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Specimens from the iliac crest (n = 10) and tibia (n = 10) in excess of that needed for patients undergoing foot or ankle fusion were examined histologically. Iliac samples were taken from the anterior iliac crest. Tibial samples were harvested from the region of Gerdy's tubercle. Specimens were graded based on the percent of bone surfaces that opposed active hematopoietic marrow, with Grade I at 0%, through Grade VI at 81% to 100%. Differences between iliac and tibial grafts were evaluated with Fisher's Exact Test.
RESULTS: Iliac crest and tibial bone grafts both showed trabecular fragments with abundant osteocytes. All iliac grafts contained active hematopoietic marrow. In contrast, the medullary space of tibial grafts contained fat and little hematopoietic marrow. Nine iliac grafts were graded V or VI; whereas the ten tibial bone grafts were all graded I or II (p = 0.0001). The difference in the numbers of samples in each group ranked as grade VI was also statistically significant (p = 0.005).
CONCLUSION: Iliac bone grafts contained active hematopoietic marrow, whereas quiescent medullary fat predominated in tibial grafts. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: These findings raise questions about the cellular contributions of different sources of bone graft to bone healing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20460069     DOI: 10.3113/FAI.2010.0418

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Foot Ankle Int        ISSN: 1071-1007            Impact factor:   2.827


  7 in total

1.  Tibial Bone Grafting for Wrist Reconstruction.

Authors:  Schneider K Rancy; Stephanie D Malliaris; Scott W Wolfe
Journal:  J Wrist Surg       Date:  2016-07-21

2.  Retro-articular drilling and bone grafting of juvenile knee osteochondritis dissecans: a technical description.

Authors:  Marios G Lykissas; Eric J Wall; Senthil Nathan
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Autograft transfer from the ipsilateral femoral condyle in depressed tibial plateau fractures.

Authors:  N K Sferopoulos
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2014-09-30

4.  The Impact of Patient Age on Foot and Ankle Arthrodesis Supplemented with Autograft or an Autograft Alternative (rhPDGF-BB/β-TCP).

Authors:  Gregory C Berlet; Judith F Baumhauer; Mark Glazebrook; Steven L Haddad; Alastair Younger; Jovelyn D Quiton; David A Fitch; Timothy R Daniels; Christopher W DiGiovanni
Journal:  JB JS Open Access       Date:  2020-11-17

Review 5.  The Use of Bone Grafts, Bone Graft Substitutes, and Orthobiologics for Osseous Healing in Foot and Ankle Surgery.

Authors:  Jonathan R Peterson; Fangyu Chen; Eugene Nwankwo; Travis J Dekker; Samuel B Adams
Journal:  Foot Ankle Orthop       Date:  2019-07-10

6.  Fabrication of Naturally Derived Double-Network Hydrogels With a Sustained Aspirin Release System for Facilitating Bone Regeneration.

Authors:  Wenfeng Zhu; Rui Chen; Weiheng Wang; Yi Liu; Changgui Shi; Songjun Tang; Guoke Tang
Journal:  Front Chem       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 5.221

7.  Comparing morbidities of bone graft harvesting from the anterior iliac crest and proximal tibia: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Ying-Cheng Huang; Chun-Yu Chen; Kai-Cheng Lin; Jenn-Huei Renn; Yih-Wen Tarng; Chien-Jen Hsu; Wei-Ning Chang; Shan-Wei Yang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 2.359

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.