| Literature DB >> 20459830 |
Patricia Jumbo-Lucioni1, Julien F Ayroles, Michelle Moses Chambers, Katherine W Jordan, Jeff Leips, Trudy Fc Mackay, Maria De Luca.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Obesity and phenotypic traits associated with this condition exhibit significant heritability in natural populations of most organisms. While a number of genes and genetic pathways have been implicated to play a role in obesity associated traits, the genetic architecture that underlies the natural variation in these traits is largely unknown. Here, we used 40 wild-derived inbred lines of Drosophila melanogaster to quantify genetic variation in body weight, the content of three major metabolites (glycogen, triacylglycerol, and glycerol) associated with obesity, and metabolic rate in young flies. We chose these lines because they were previously screened for variation in whole-genome transcript abundance and in several adult life-history traits, including longevity, resistance to starvation stress, chill-coma recovery, mating behavior, and competitive fitness. This enabled us not only to identify candidate genes and transcriptional networks that might explain variation for energy metabolism traits, but also to investigate the genetic interrelationships among energy metabolism, behavioral, and life-history traits that have evolved in natural populations.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20459830 PMCID: PMC2880307 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-11-297
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genomics ISSN: 1471-2164 Impact factor: 3.969
Figure 1Variation in body weight and energy metabolism traits in . Distribution of trait means among 40 wild-derived inbred lines of D. melanogaster. Data represent means ± SEM for n = 10 independent replicates. The pink and blue bars in panels A-E depict females and males, respectively.
Figure 2Metabolites with significantly different levels in . Data represent least square means ± SEM of GLY (panel A), TAG (panel B), and GLYC (panel C) calculated using total protein content as a covariate in the analysis averaged across sexes (n = 20 independent replicates). Black and white bars represent mutant and control flies, respectively.
Figure 3Modules of correlated transcripts associated with variation in body weight and energy metabolism traits. (A) Heat map of correlated probe sets after module formation for BW (13 modules), GLY (9 modules), TAG (5 modules), GLYC (13 modules), and MR (6 modules). Each point represents the correlation between two genes. The color scale bar indicates the value of the correlation. (B) Interaction network of correlated (|r| ≥ 0.7) transcripts for BW module 10. Each node represents a gene and each edge a significant correlation between a pair of genes. (C) Distribution of tissue-specific expression of transcripts in BW module 10 based on data from FlyAtlas http://www.flyatlas.org/[49]. (D) Interaction network of correlated (|r| ≥ 0.6) transcripts for GLY module 7. (E) Network of correlated (|r| ≥ 0.7) transcripts for TAG module 4. (F) Interaction network of correlated (|r| ≥ 0.9) transcripts for GLYC module 11. (G) Distribution of tissue-specific expression of all transcripts associated with MR. Nodes showed as pink in the interaction networks represent those candidate genes for which homozygous mutants were tested. The visualization of interaction networks was performed using Cytoscape 2.6.3. [84].
Genetic correlations between energy metabolism and life-history traits averaged across sexes (A), for females (B), and for males (C).
| FT | CL | SR | CC | LS | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BW | -0.48 ± 0.14** | 0.21 ± 0.16 | 0.32 ± 0.15 | 0.01 ± 0.16 | |
| GLY | -0.38 ± 0.15** | 0.08 ± 0.16 | 0.29 ± 0.15 | 0.02 ± 0.16 | 0.17 ± 0.16 |
| TAG | -0.14 ± 0.16 | 0.08 ± 0.16 | 0.12 ± 0.16 | 0.18 ± 0.16 | -0.15 ± 0.16 |
| GLYC | 0.05 ± 0.16 | 0.22 ± 0.16 | 0.06 ± 0.16 | 0.01 ± 0.16 | -0.07 ± 0.16 |
| MR | 0.14 ± 0.16 | -0.11 ± 0.16 | -0.04 ± 0.16 | 0.01 ± 0.16 | -0.26 ± 0.16 |
| BW | 0.38 ± 0.15* | 0.26 ± 0.16 | -0.01 ± 0.16 | ||
| GLY | -0.27 ± 0.16 | 0.10 ± 0.16 | 0.36 ± 0.15* | -0.07 ± 0.16 | 0.10 ± 0.16 |
| TAG | -0.10 ± 0.16 | 0.20 ± 0.16 | 0.14 ± 0.16 | 0.05 ± 0.16 | 0.01 ± 0.16 |
| GLYC | 0.04 ± 0.16 | 0.22 ± 0.16 | 0.00 ± 0.16 | 0.11 ± 0.16 | -0.08 ± 0.16 |
| MR | 0.06 ± 0.16 | -0.11 ± 0.16 | 0.00 ± 0.16 | -0.10 ± 0.16 | -0.16 ± 0.16 |
| BW | -0.42 ± 0.15** | -0.06 ± 0.16 | 0.27 ± 0.16 | 0.07 ± 0.16 | |
| GLY | 0.04 ± 0.16 | 0.42 ± 0.15** | 0.20 ± 0.16 | 0.24 ± 0.16 | |
| TAG | -0.17 ± 0.16 | -0.04 ± 0.16 | 0.14 ± 0.16 | 0.38 ± 0.15** | -0.29 ± 0.16 |
| GLYC | 0.06 ± 0.16 | 0.22 ± 0.16 | 0.13 ± 0.16 | -0.05 ± 0.16 | -0.06 ± 0.16 |
| MR | 0.25 ± 0.16 | -0.10 ± 0.16 | -0.04 ± 0.16 | -0.15 ± 0.16 | -0.41 ± 0.15** |
BW: body weight; GLY: glycogen; TAG: triacylglycerol; GLYC: glycerol; MR: metabolic rate; FT: competitive fitness; CL: copulation latency; SR: starvation resistance; CC: chill-coma recovery; LS: lifespan. *P ≤ 0.05; **P ≤ 0.01; ***P ≤ 0.001; ****P < 0.0001. Values in bold indicate correlations that remain significant after Bonferroni correction based on sequential Bonferroni tests.