Literature DB >> 20459567

Comparison of margin assessment by radial and shave sections in wide local excision specimens for invasive carcinoma of the breast.

Zsolt Hodi1, Ian O Ellis, Christopher W Elston, Sarah E Pinder, Glynn Donovan, R Douglas Macmillan, Andrew H S Lee.   

Abstract

AIMS: Standard margin assessment of breast carcinoma surgical specimens uses radial sections perpendicular to the margin. Shave sections assess a larger surface area of margin than radial sections. The aim was to assess the value of additional shave sections of the margin. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Both types of section were used to assess 471 wide local excision specimens for invasive carcinoma. One hundred and seventy-nine specimens had positive margins: only radial margins were involved (tumour within 5 mm of margin) in 76, only shave margins in 45, and both shave and radial margins in 58. Residual carcinoma was found in re-excision specimens (immediate or later) in 43% when the closest distance to the radial margin was 0-1 mm, 25% for 2-4 mm, 18% for 5-9 mm and 13% for >9 mm. Residual carcinoma was found in 44% of specimens if any shave section was positive and in 9% if all shaves were negative. Residual carcinoma was found in 32% if either radial or shave sections were positive and in 4% if neither was positive.
CONCLUSIONS: The combination of radial and shave sections appears to be good at separating patients into two groups with high and low risk of residual carcinoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20459567     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2010.03518.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Histopathology        ISSN: 0309-0167            Impact factor:   5.087


  3 in total

Review 1.  DCIS Margins and Breast Conservation: MD Anderson Cancer Center Multidisciplinary Practice Guidelines and Outcomes.

Authors:  Henry M Kuerer; Benjamin D Smith; Mariana Chavez-MacGregor; Constance Albarracin; Carlos H Barcenas; Lumarie Santiago; Mary E Edgerton; Gaiane M Rauch; Sharon H Giordano; Aysegul Sahin; Savitri Krishnamurthy; Wendy Woodward; Debasish Tripathy; Wei T Yang; Kelly K Hunt
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 4.207

2.  Does Surgical Margin Width Remain a Challenge for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer? A Retrospective Analysis.

Authors:  Eduard-Alexandru Bonci; Ștefan Țîțu; Alexandru Marius Petrușan; Claudiu Hossu; Vlad Alexandru Gâta; Morvarid Talaeian Ghomi; Paul Milan Kubelac; Teodora Irina Bonci; Andra Piciu; Maria Cosnarovici; Liviu Hîțu; Alexandra Timea Kirsch-Mangu; Diana Cristina Pop; Ioan Cosmin Lisencu; Patriciu Achimaș-Cadariu; Doina Piciu; Hank Schmidt; Bogdan Fetica
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 2.430

3.  Current Status and Factors Influencing Surgical Options for Breast Cancer in China: A Nationwide Cross-Sectional Survey of 110 Hospitals.

Authors:  Benlong Yang; Guosheng Ren; Erwei Song; Da Pan; Jing Zhang; Yongsheng Wang; Ning Liao; Jinhai Tang; Xiang Wang; Shude Cui; Feng Jin; Cuizhi Geng; Qiang Sun; Hongyuan Li; Zhimin Fan; Xuchen Cao; Haibo Wang; Shu Wang; Zhimin Shao; Jiong Wu
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 5.837

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.