Literature DB >> 20458358

Cell shape, spreading symmetry and the polarization of stress-fibers in cells.

A Zemel1, F Rehfeldt, A E X Brown, D E Discher, S A Safran.   

Abstract

The active regulation of cellular forces during cell adhesion plays an important role in the determination of cell size, shape and internal structure. While on flat, homogeneous and isotropic substrates some cells spread isotropically, others spread anisotropically and assume elongated structures. In addition, in their native environment as well as in vitro experiments, the cell shape and spreading asymmetry can be modulated by the local distribution of adhesive molecules and topography of the environment. We present a simple elastic model, and experiments on stem cells to explain the variation of cell size with the matrix rigidity. In addition, we predict the experimental consequences of two mechanisms of acto-myosin polarization and focus here on the effect of the cell spreading asymmetry on the regulation of the stress-fiber alignment in the cytoskeleton. We show that when cell spreading is sufficiently asymmetric the alignment of acto-myosin forces in the cell increases monotonically with the matrix rigidity; however, in general this alignment is non-monotonic as shown previously. These results highlight the importance of the symmetry characteristics of cell spreading in the regulation of cytoskeleton structure and suggest a mechanism by which different cell types may acquire different morphologies and internal structures in different mechanical environments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20458358      PMCID: PMC2865697          DOI: 10.1088/0953-8984/22/19/194110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Condens Matter        ISSN: 0953-8984            Impact factor:   2.333


  38 in total

1.  Elastic interactions of cells.

Authors:  U S Schwarz; S A Safran
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2002-01-11       Impact factor: 9.161

2.  Effects of substrate stiffness on cell morphology, cytoskeletal structure, and adhesion.

Authors:  Tony Yeung; Penelope C Georges; Lisa A Flanagan; Beatrice Marg; Miguelina Ortiz; Makoto Funaki; Nastaran Zahir; Wenyu Ming; Valerie Weaver; Paul A Janmey
Journal:  Cell Motil Cytoskeleton       Date:  2005-01

Review 3.  Tissue cells feel and respond to the stiffness of their substrate.

Authors:  Dennis E Discher; Paul Janmey; Yu-Li Wang
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-11-18       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Anisotropy of cell adhesive microenvironment governs cell internal organization and orientation of polarity.

Authors:  Manuel Théry; Victor Racine; Matthieu Piel; Anne Pépin; Ariane Dimitrov; Yong Chen; Jean-Baptiste Sibarita; Michel Bornens
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-12-18       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Dynamics of membranes driven by actin polymerization.

Authors:  Nir S Gov; Ajay Gopinathan
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2005-10-20       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Active self-polarization of contractile cells in asymmetrically shaped domains.

Authors:  A Zemel; S A Safran
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2007-08-07

7.  Matrices with compliance comparable to that of brain tissue select neuronal over glial growth in mixed cortical cultures.

Authors:  Penelope C Georges; William J Miller; David F Meaney; Evelyn S Sawyer; Paul A Janmey
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2006-02-03       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Attachment of fibroblasts on smooth and microgrooved polystyrene.

Authors:  X F Walboomers; W Monaghan; A S Curtis; J A Jansen
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1999-08

9.  Myotubes differentiate optimally on substrates with tissue-like stiffness: pathological implications for soft or stiff microenvironments.

Authors:  Adam J Engler; Maureen A Griffin; Shamik Sen; Carsten G Bönnemann; H Lee Sweeney; Dennis E Discher
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2004-09-13       Impact factor: 10.539

10.  Quantification of cell edge velocities and traction forces reveals distinct motility modules during cell spreading.

Authors:  Benjamin J Dubin-Thaler; Jake M Hofman; Yunfei Cai; Harry Xenias; Ingrid Spielman; Anna V Shneidman; Lawrence A David; Hans-Günther Döbereiner; Chris H Wiggins; Michael P Sheetz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-11-17       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  24 in total

1.  Cardiac myocyte remodeling mediated by N-cadherin-dependent mechanosensing.

Authors:  Anant Chopra; Erdem Tabdanov; Hersh Patel; Paul A Janmey; J Yasha Kresh
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 4.733

2.  Cell shape dynamics reveal balance of elasticity and contractility in peripheral arcs.

Authors:  Céline Labouesse; Alexander B Verkhovsky; Jean-Jacques Meister; Chiara Gabella; Benoît Vianay
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Long-range force transmission in fibrous matrices enabled by tension-driven alignment of fibers.

Authors:  Hailong Wang; A S Abhilash; Christopher S Chen; Rebecca G Wells; Vivek B Shenoy
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Geometry and network connectivity govern the mechanics of stress fibers.

Authors:  Elena Kassianidou; Christoph A Brand; Ulrich S Schwarz; Sanjay Kumar
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  The role of mechanics in actin stress fiber kinetics.

Authors:  E L Elson; G M Genin
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  2013-07-29       Impact factor: 3.905

6.  Adhesion dynamics and durotaxis in migrating cells.

Authors:  Ben Harland; Sam Walcott; Sean X Sun
Journal:  Phys Biol       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 2.583

7.  Three-Dimensional Visualization of the Podocyte Actin Network Using Integrated Membrane Extraction, Electron Microscopy, and Machine Learning.

Authors:  Chengqing Qu; Robyn Roth; Pongpratch Puapatanakul; Charles Loitman; Dina Hammad; Guy M Genin; Jeffrey H Miner; Hani Y Suleiman
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2021-11-10       Impact factor: 10.121

8.  Effects of 3D geometries on cellular gradient sensing and polarization.

Authors:  Fabian Spill; Vivi Andasari; Michael Mak; Roger D Kamm; Muhammad H Zaman
Journal:  Phys Biol       Date:  2016-06-25       Impact factor: 2.583

9.  Shp2 plays a crucial role in cell structural orientation and force polarity in response to matrix rigidity.

Authors:  Hsiao-Hui Lee; Hsin-Chang Lee; Chih-Chiang Chou; Sung Sik Hur; Katie Osterday; Juan C del Álamo; Juan C Lasheras; Shu Chien
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Dynamic mechanisms of cell rigidity sensing: insights from a computational model of actomyosin networks.

Authors:  Carlos Borau; Taeyoon Kim; Tamara Bidone; José Manuel García-Aznar; Roger D Kamm
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.