Literature DB >> 20458238

The relationship between corneal biomechanical properties and confocal microscopy findings in normal and keratoconic eyes.

Volkan Hurmeric1, Afsun Sahin, Gokhan Ozge, Atilla Bayer.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the relationship between corneal biomechanical properties and confocal microscopy (CM) findings in normal and keratoconic eyes.
METHODS: The study consisted of 28 eyes of 28 healthy volunteers and 23 eyes of 15 patients with keratoconus. The diagnosis of keratoconus was made with corneal topography and clinical findings. The corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF) were measured by the ocular response analyzer. In vivo CM was performed with NIDEK Confoscan 3. CH and CRF were compared with corneal morphological findings (detailed cell counts of endothelial, stromal, and epithelial cells) in vivo.
RESULTS: CH was 10.1 +/- 1.3 mm Hg in normal eyes and 7.4 +/- 1.5 mm Hg in keratoconic eyes (P < 0.0001). CRF was 10.1 +/- 1.8 mm Hg in normal eyes and 6.2 +/- 1.4 mm Hg in keratoconic eyes (P < 0.0001). CH and CRF were negatively correlated with full-thickness stromal keratocyte density (P < 0.01; r = -0.52 and P < 0.001; r = -0.67, respectively) in healthy eyes. Keratocyte density of the posterior half of the stroma was found to be significantly related with CRF in healthy eyes (beta = -0.404; P = 0.01). There was no significant relationship among CH, CRF, and CM findings in eyes with keratoconus.
CONCLUSIONS: There is a significant relationship between CRF and keratocyte density of the posterior half of the stroma in healthy eyes. Our results suggest that corneal elasticity is related to not only stromal matrix but also cellular structure of the cornea.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20458238     DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e3181c11dc6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cornea        ISSN: 0277-3740            Impact factor:   2.651


  8 in total

1.  Corneal biochemical features of patients with vernal keratoconjunctivitis.

Authors:  Sinan Emre; Esin Başer; Bilge Oztürk; Sibel Zorlu; Ozgür Uzun; Ceren Gülhan
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Investigation of corneal biomechanics at moderate to high refractive errors.

Authors:  Nehir İnceoğlu; Sinan Emre; Mahmut Oğuz Ulusoy
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 2.031

3.  Corneal biomechanical properties in exfoliation syndrome and exfoliation glaucoma.

Authors:  Zisis Gatzioufas; Berthold Seitz
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-04-21       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Does corneal hysteresis correlate with endothelial cell density?

Authors:  Berna Akova-Budak; Sertaç Argun Kıvanç
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2015-05-21

Review 5.  Corneal biomechanical properties in different ocular conditions and new measurement techniques.

Authors:  Nery Garcia-Porta; Paulo Fernandes; Antonio Queiros; Jose Salgado-Borges; Manuel Parafita-Mato; Jose Manuel González-Méijome
Journal:  ISRN Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-03-04

6.  Evaluation of corneal deformation analyzed with Scheimpflug based device in healthy eyes and diseased ones.

Authors:  Michele Lanza; Michela Cennamo; Stefania Iaccarino; Carlo Irregolare; Miguel Rechichi; Mario Bifani; Ugo Antonello Gironi Carnevale
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  The Superficial Stromal Scar Formation Mechanism in Keratoconus: A Study Using Laser Scanning In Vivo Confocal Microscopy.

Authors:  Peng Song; Shuting Wang; Peicheng Zhang; Wenjie Sui; Yangyang Zhang; Ting Liu; Hua Gao
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-01-18       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Graft Biomechanics Following Three Corneal Transplantation Techniques.

Authors:  Sepehr Feizi; Talieh Montahai; Hamidreza Moein
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res       Date:  2015 Jul-Sep
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.