Literature DB >> 20457035

Validation and development of interpretation guidelines for low copy number (LCN) DNA profiling in New Zealand using the AmpFlSTR SGM Plus multiplex.

Sue Petricevic1, Jonathan Whitaker, John Buckleton, Sue Vintiner, Jayshree Patel, Pauline Simon, Helen Ferraby, Waseem Hermiz, Amanda Russell.   

Abstract

The characteristics of STR profiles produced from approximately 1 ng starting template using the AMPFlSTR SGM Plus multiplex and 28 PCR cycles, are well documented. However, the analysis of samples perceived as low in starting template (less than 100 pg), and referred to as low template DNA (LTDNA), can require a test of higher sensitivity in order to achieve successful results. One way of increasing this sensitivity is to increase the number of PCR amplification cycles from 28 to 34. This type of analysis has become known as low copy number, or LCN, DNA profiling. Amplification of LTDNA under LCN conditions can result in increased incidents of profile characteristics such as allelic 'drop-in' and allelic 'drop-out'. Adopting a testing regime which includes duplicate analysis, and maintaining a laboratory environment of stringent and monitored cleanliness, enables the scientist to identify and control these phenomena for a reliable interpretation of the DNA profiling results. A recent court ruling has questioned the reliability of LCN analysis and commented on the paucity of publications surrounding the validation of the technique. We present data for the LCN validation undertaken in our laboratory, and describe the guidelines and working practices we have developed for the analysis and interpretation of profiles generated after LCN profiling. This study augments the published record relating to LCN validation and should act as a useful guide for other laboratories who are considering implementing LCN profiling.
Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20457035     DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2009.11.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet        ISSN: 1872-4973            Impact factor:   4.882


  5 in total

1.  Low-template DNA: A single DNA analysis or two replicates?

Authors:  Simone Gittelson; Carolyn R Steffen; Michael D Coble
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 2.395

2.  Comparison of STR profiling from low template DNA extracts with and without the consensus profiling method.

Authors:  Kelly S Grisedale; Angela van Daal
Journal:  Investig Genet       Date:  2012-07-02

3.  Forensic trace DNA: a review.

Authors:  Roland Ah van Oorschot; Kaye N Ballantyne; R John Mitchell
Journal:  Investig Genet       Date:  2010-12-01

4.  Development and validation of open-source software for DNA mixture interpretation based on a quantitative continuous model.

Authors:  Sho Manabe; Chie Morimoto; Yuya Hamano; Shuntaro Fujimoto; Keiji Tamaki
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-17       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Evaluation of parameters in mixed male DNA profiles for the Identifiler® multiplex system.

Authors:  Na Hu; Bin Cong; Tao Gao; Rong Hu; Yi Chen; Hui Tang; Luyan Xue; Shujin Li; Chunling Ma
Journal:  Int J Mol Med       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 4.101

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.