Curt B Irwin1, Mary E Sesto. 1. Trace Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA.
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: Clinical Measurement. INTRODUCTION: Grip strength has been administered for many years with a wide variety of instruments and for very different purposes. PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: To examine the reliability and validity of a new grip measurement device, the multiaxis profile (MAP) dynamometer, compared with the Baseline dynamometer (Fabrication Enterprises Inc., White Plains, NY) and vigorimeter. METHODS: Twenty-eight participants (<30 yr, n=14; and >65 yr, n=14) completed grip strength testing using all three devices. Measurements were obtained at baseline and one to two weeks later. RESULTS: Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for the MAP ranged from 0.94 to 0.99. The other two devices had ICCs of 0.95-0.98. Correlations among the MAP dynamometer, the Baseline dynamometer, and the vigorimeter were 0.78-0.90. The results indicate high concurrent validity among all the three devices and that all devices are reliable instruments to measure the grip strength of both younger and older adults. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to measuring grip strength, the MAP dynamometer measures other grip-related information, such as grip force vectors, rate of force buildup, and force variability. This additional grip information may improve our understanding of hand function and changes because of aging. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: n/a.
STUDY DESIGN: Clinical Measurement. INTRODUCTION:Grip strength has been administered for many years with a wide variety of instruments and for very different purposes. PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: To examine the reliability and validity of a new grip measurement device, the multiaxis profile (MAP) dynamometer, compared with the Baseline dynamometer (Fabrication Enterprises Inc., White Plains, NY) and vigorimeter. METHODS: Twenty-eight participants (<30 yr, n=14; and >65 yr, n=14) completed grip strength testing using all three devices. Measurements were obtained at baseline and one to two weeks later. RESULTS: Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for the MAP ranged from 0.94 to 0.99. The other two devices had ICCs of 0.95-0.98. Correlations among the MAP dynamometer, the Baseline dynamometer, and the vigorimeter were 0.78-0.90. The results indicate high concurrent validity among all the three devices and that all devices are reliable instruments to measure the grip strength of both younger and older adults. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to measuring grip strength, the MAP dynamometer measures other grip-related information, such as grip force vectors, rate of force buildup, and force variability. This additional grip information may improve our understanding of hand function and changes because of aging. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: n/a.
Authors: M Foldvari; M Clark; L C Laviolette; M A Bernstein; D Kaliton; C Castaneda; C T Pu; J M Hausdorff; R A Fielding; M A Singh Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2000-04 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: T Rantanen; J M Guralnik; R Sakari-Rantala; S Leveille; E M Simonsick; S Ling; L P Fried Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 1999-02 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Christian M Günther; Alexander Bürger; Markus Rickert; Alexander Crispin; Christoph U Schulz Journal: J Hand Surg Am Date: 2008-04 Impact factor: 2.230
Authors: Amrish O Chourasia; Kevin A Buhr; David P Rabago; Richard Kijowski; Curtis B Irwin; Mary E Sesto Journal: J Hand Ther Date: 2011-12-03 Impact factor: 1.950
Authors: Amrish O Chourasia; Kevin A Buhr; David P Rabago; Richard Kijowski; Kenneth S Lee; Michael P Ryan; Jessica M Grettie-Belling; Mary E Sesto Journal: J Orthop Sports Phys Ther Date: 2013-03-18 Impact factor: 4.751
Authors: Ranavolo Alberto; Francesco Draicchio; Tiwana Varrecchia; Alessio Silvetti; Sergio Iavicoli Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-09-13 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: José Burgos; Aitor Viribay; Diego Fernández-Lázaro; Julio Calleja-González; Josefa González-Santos; Juan Mielgo-Ayuso Journal: Nutrients Date: 2021-12-23 Impact factor: 5.717
Authors: Pablo Rodríguez-Sánchez-Laulhé; Luis Gabriel Luque-Romero; Jesús Blanquero; Alejandro Suero-Pineda; Ángela Biscarri-Carbonero; Francisco José Barrero-García; Alberto Marcos Heredia-Rizo Journal: Trials Date: 2020-09-10 Impact factor: 2.279