Literature DB >> 20456835

Do regulatory bioequivalence requirements adequately reflect the therapeutic equivalence of modified-release drug products?

Laszlo Endrenyi1, Laszlo Tothfalusi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To demonstrate that current regulatory requirements for bioequivalence (BE) do not always reflect therapeutic equivalence. To investigate the potential usefulness of an additional metric, the partial AUC.
METHODS: Pharmacokinetic information was reviewed and evaluated on the pharmacokinetics of modified-release methylphenidate and nifedipine products.
RESULTS: In studies of modified-release products of methylphenidate as well as of nifedipine, traditional regulatory criteria found two formulations to be bioequivalent even though their concentration profiles strongly diverged during the period of absorption. An additional metric, partial AUC, discriminated strongly between the concentrations of the drug products.
CONCLUSIONS: The current regulatory criteria for the acceptance of BE do not always reflect the therapeutic equivalence of modified-release drug products. With some modified-release products, the application of an additional metric, the partial AUC, yields an improved discriminatory representation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20456835     DOI: 10.18433/j32g6p

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharm Pharm Sci        ISSN: 1482-1826            Impact factor:   2.327


  6 in total

1.  Summary workshop report: Facilitating oral product development and reducing regulatory burden through novel approaches to assess bioavailability/bioequivalence.

Authors:  James E Polli; Jack A Cook; Barbara M Davit; Paul A Dickinson; Domenick Argenti; Nancy Barbour; Alfredo García-Arieta; Jean-Marie Geoffroy; Kerry Hartauer; Shoufeng Li; Amitava Mitra; Francis X Muller; Vivek Purohit; Manuel Sanchez-Felix; John W Skoug; Kin Tang
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2012-06-09       Impact factor: 4.009

2.  The Two Main Goals of Bioequivalence Studies.

Authors:  Laszlo Endrenyi; Henning H Blume; Laszlo Tothfalusi
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 3.  Metrics for the evaluation of bioequivalence of modified-release formulations.

Authors:  Laszlo Endrenyi; Laszlo Tothfalusi
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 4.009

4.  Proposing the Use of Partial AUC as an Adjunctive Measure in Establishing Bioequivalence Between Deltoid and Gluteal Administration of Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotics.

Authors:  Lik Hang N Lee; Charles Choi; Pavel Gershkovich; Alasdair M Barr; William G Honer; Ric M Procyshyn
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.441

5.  The Safety of Generic Prescription Drugs in the United States.

Authors:  Sonal Singh
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 5.606

6.  Use of partial AUC (PAUC) to evaluate bioequivalence--a case study with complex absorption: methylphenidate.

Authors:  Jeanne Fourie Zirkelbach; Andre J Jackson; Yaning Wang; Donald J Schuirmann
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 4.200

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.