PURPOSE: To develop an instrument to represent the availability of needed environmental features (EFs) in the physical, social and attitudinal environment of home, school and community for children with cerebral palsy. METHOD: Following a literature review and qualitative studies, the European Child Environment Questionnaire (ECEQ) was developed to capture whether EFs needed by children with cerebral palsy were available to them: 24, 24 and 12 items related to the physical, social and attitudinal environments, respectively. The ECEQ was administered to parents of 818 children with cerebral palsy aged 8-12 years, in seven European countries. A domain structure was developed using factor analysis. RESULTS: Parents responded to 98% of items. Seven items were omitted from statistical models as the EFs they referred to were available to most children who needed them; two items were omitted as they did not fit well into plausible domains. The final domains, based on 51 items, were: Transport, Physical - home, Physical - community, Physical - school, Social support - home, Social support - community, Attitudes - family and friends, Attitudes - teachers and therapists, Attitudes - classmates. CONCLUSION: ECEQ was acceptable to parents and can be used to assess both the access children with cerebral palsy have to the EFs that they need and how available individual EFs are.
PURPOSE: To develop an instrument to represent the availability of needed environmental features (EFs) in the physical, social and attitudinal environment of home, school and community for children with cerebral palsy. METHOD: Following a literature review and qualitative studies, the European Child Environment Questionnaire (ECEQ) was developed to capture whether EFs needed by children with cerebral palsy were available to them: 24, 24 and 12 items related to the physical, social and attitudinal environments, respectively. The ECEQ was administered to parents of 818 children with cerebral palsy aged 8-12 years, in seven European countries. A domain structure was developed using factor analysis. RESULTS: Parents responded to 98% of items. Seven items were omitted from statistical models as the EFs they referred to were available to most children who needed them; two items were omitted as they did not fit well into plausible domains. The final domains, based on 51 items, were: Transport, Physical - home, Physical - community, Physical - school, Social support - home, Social support - community, Attitudes - family and friends, Attitudes - teachers and therapists, Attitudes - classmates. CONCLUSION: ECEQ was acceptable to parents and can be used to assess both the access children with cerebral palsy have to the EFs that they need and how available individual EFs are.
Authors: Allan Colver; Ute Thyen; Catherine Arnaud; Eva Beckung; Jerome Fauconnier; Marco Marcelli; Vicki McManus; Susan I Michelsen; Jackie Parkes; Kathryn Parkinson; Heather O Dickinson Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2012-07-27 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Heather O Dickinson; Marion Rapp; Catherine Arnaud; Malin Carlsson; Allan F Colver; Jérôme Fauconnier; Alan Lyons; Marco Marcelli; Susan I Michelsen; Jackie Parkes; Kathryn Parkinson Journal: BMC Res Notes Date: 2012-06-15
Authors: Donna S Hurley; Theresa Sukal-Moulton; Deborah Gaebler-Spira; Kristin J Krosschell; Larissa Pavone; Akmer Mutlu; Julius Pa Dewald; Michael E Msall Journal: Int J Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2015-03-23