Literature DB >> 20454594

Comparison of manual and automated determination of hippocampal volumes in MCI and early AD.

Li Shen1, Andrew J Saykin, Sungeun Kim, Hiram A Firpi, John D West, Shannon L Risacher, Brenna C McDonald, Tara L McHugh, Heather A Wishart, Laura A Flashman.   

Abstract

MRI-based hippocampal volume analysis has been extensively employed given its potential as a biomarker for brain disorders such as Alzheimer's disease (AD), and accurate and efficient determination of hippocampal volumes from brain images is still a challenging issue. We compared an automated method, FreeSurfer (V4), with a published manual protocol for the determination of hippocampal volumes from T1-weighted MRI scans. Our study included MRI data from 125 older adult subjects: healthy controls with no significant cognitive complaints or deficits (HC, n=38), euthymic individuals with cognitive complaints (CC, n=39) but intact neuropsychological performance, and patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (MCI, n=37) or a clinical diagnosis of probable AD (AD, n=11). Pearson correlations and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated to evaluate the relationship between results of the manual tracing and FreeSurfer methods and to estimate their agreement. Results indicated that these two methods derived highly correlated results with strong agreement. After controlling for the age, sex and intracranial volume in statistical group analysis, both the manual tracing and FreeSurfer methods yield similar patterns: both the MCI group and the AD group showed hippocampal volume reduction compared to both the HC group and the CC group, and the HC and CC groups did not differ. These comparisons suggest that FreeSurfer has the potential to be used in automated determination of hippocampal volumes for large-scale MCI/AD-related MRI studies, where manual methods are inefficient or not feasible.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alzheimer’s disease; Magnetic resonance imaging; cognitive complaints; hippocampus; mild cognitive impairment; segmentation

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20454594      PMCID: PMC2863347          DOI: 10.1007/s11682-010-9088-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav        ISSN: 1931-7557            Impact factor:   3.978


  29 in total

1.  Measuring size and shape of the hippocampus in MR images using a deformable shape model.

Authors:  Dinggang Shen; Scott Moffat; Susan M Resnick; Christos Davatzikos
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Statistical analysis of hippocampal asymmetry in schizophrenia.

Authors:  L Wang; S C Joshi; M I Miller; J G Csernansky
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Whole brain segmentation: automated labeling of neuroanatomical structures in the human brain.

Authors:  Bruce Fischl; David H Salat; Evelina Busa; Marilyn Albert; Megan Dieterich; Christian Haselgrove; Andre van der Kouwe; Ron Killiany; David Kennedy; Shuna Klaveness; Albert Montillo; Nikos Makris; Bruce Rosen; Anders M Dale
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2002-01-31       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Amygdala-hippocampal shape differences in schizophrenia: the application of 3D shape models to volumetric MR data.

Authors:  Martha E Shenton; Guido Gerig; Robert W McCarley; Gábor Székely; Ron Kikinis
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2002-08-20       Impact factor: 3.222

5.  Anatomic basis of amygdaloid and hippocampal volume measurement by magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  C Watson; F Andermann; P Gloor; M Jones-Gotman; T Peters; A Evans; A Olivier; D Melanson; G Leroux
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 9.910

6.  Hippocampus-specific fMRI group activation analysis using the continuous medial representation.

Authors:  Paul A Yushkevich; John A Detre; Dawn Mechanic-Hamilton; María A Fernández-Seara; Kathy Z Tang; Angela Hoang; Marc Korczykowski; Hui Zhang; James C Gee
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-02-22       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Hippocampal deformities in schizophrenia characterized by high dimensional brain mapping.

Authors:  John G Csernansky; Lei Wang; Donald Jones; Devna Rastogi-Cruz; Joel A Posener; Gitry Heydebrand; J Philip Miller; Michael I Miller
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 18.112

8.  A unified approach for morphometric and functional data analysis in young, old, and demented adults using automated atlas-based head size normalization: reliability and validation against manual measurement of total intracranial volume.

Authors:  Randy L Buckner; Denise Head; Jamie Parker; Anthony F Fotenos; Daniel Marcus; John C Morris; Abraham Z Snyder
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Mapping hippocampal and ventricular change in Alzheimer disease.

Authors:  Paul M Thompson; Kiralee M Hayashi; Greig I De Zubicaray; Andrew L Janke; Stephen E Rose; James Semple; Michael S Hong; David H Herman; David Gravano; David M Doddrell; Arthur W Toga
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Validation of hippocampal volumes measured using a manual method and two automated methods (FreeSurfer and IBASPM) in chronic major depressive disorder.

Authors:  Woo Suk Tae; Sam Soo Kim; Kang Uk Lee; Eui-Cheol Nam; Keun Woo Kim
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2008-04-15       Impact factor: 2.804

View more
  38 in total

1.  Functional connectivity of the posterior hippocampus is more dominant as we age.

Authors:  Sonja Blum; Christian Habeck; Jason Steffener; Qolamreza Razlighi; Yaakov Stern
Journal:  Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 3.065

2.  3D maps localize caudate nucleus atrophy in 400 Alzheimer's disease, mild cognitive impairment, and healthy elderly subjects.

Authors:  S K Madsen; A J Ho; X Hua; P S Saharan; A W Toga; C R Jack; M W Weiner; P M Thompson
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 4.673

3.  Longitudinal MRI atrophy biomarkers: relationship to conversion in the ADNI cohort.

Authors:  Shannon L Risacher; Li Shen; John D West; Sungeun Kim; Brenna C McDonald; Laurel A Beckett; Danielle J Harvey; Clifford R Jack; Michael W Weiner; Andrew J Saykin
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 4.673

4.  Comparative performance evaluation of automated segmentation methods of hippocampus from magnetic resonance images of temporal lobe epilepsy patients.

Authors:  Mohammad-Parsa Hosseini; Mohammad-Reza Nazem-Zadeh; Dario Pompili; Kourosh Jafari-Khouzani; Kost Elisevich; Hamid Soltanian-Zadeh
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Hippocampal and amygdalar volumetric differences in pathological gambling: a preliminary study of the associations with the behavioral inhibition system.

Authors:  Ardeshir S Rahman; Jiansong Xu; Marc N Potenza
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2013-09-27       Impact factor: 7.853

6.  A direct morphometric comparison of five labeling protocols for multi-atlas driven automatic segmentation of the hippocampus in Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Sean M Nestor; Erin Gibson; Fu-Qiang Gao; Alex Kiss; Sandra E Black
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  A multivariate twin study of hippocampal volume, self-esteem and well-being in middle-aged men.

Authors:  T S Kubarych; E C Prom-Wormley; C E Franz; M S Panizzon; A M Dale; B Fischl; L T Eyler; C Fennema-Notestine; M D Grant; R L Hauger; D H Hellhammer; A J Jak; T L Jernigan; S J Lupien; M J Lyons; S P Mendoza; M C Neale; L J Seidman; M T Tsuang; W S Kremen
Journal:  Genes Brain Behav       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 3.449

8.  The Chinese Verbal Learning Test specifically assesses hippocampal state.

Authors:  Richard M Tsai; Josiah K Leong; Shubir Dutt; Chiung Chih Chang; Allen K Lee; Steven Z Chao; Jennifer S Yokoyama; Marian Tse; Joel H Kramer; Bruce L Miller; Howard J Rosen
Journal:  Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 2.035

9.  Evaluation of two automated methods for PET region of interest analysis.

Authors:  Martin Schain; Katarina Varnäs; Zsolt Cselényi; Christer Halldin; Lars Farde; Andrea Varrone
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2014-10

10.  Turning bias in virtual spatial navigation: age-related differences and neuroanatomical correlates.

Authors:  Peng Yuan; Ana M Daugherty; Naftali Raz
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2013-11-02       Impact factor: 3.251

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.