Literature DB >> 11798276

Measuring size and shape of the hippocampus in MR images using a deformable shape model.

Dinggang Shen1, Scott Moffat, Susan M Resnick, Christos Davatzikos.   

Abstract

A method for segmentation and quantification of the shape and size of the hippocampus is proposed, based on an automated image analysis algorithm. The algorithm uses a deformable shape model to locate the hippocampus in magnetic resonance images and to determine a geometric representation of its boundary. The deformable model combines three types of information. First, it employs information about the geometric properties of the hippocampal boundary, from a local and relatively finer scale to a more global and relatively coarser scale. Second, the model includes a statistical characterization of normal shape variation across individuals, serving as prior knowledge to the algorithm. Third, the algorithm utilizes a number of manually defined boundary points, which can help guide the model deformation to the appropriate boundaries, wherever these boundaries are weak or not clearly defined in MR images. Excellent agreement is demonstrated between the algorithm and manual segmentations by well-trained raters, with a correlation coefficient equal to 0.97 and algorithm/rater differences statistically equivalent to interrater differences for manual definitions.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11798276     DOI: 10.1006/nimg.2001.0987

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  33 in total

1.  Comparison of manual and automated determination of hippocampal volumes in MCI and early AD.

Authors:  Li Shen; Andrew J Saykin; Sungeun Kim; Hiram A Firpi; John D West; Shannon L Risacher; Brenna C McDonald; Tara L McHugh; Heather A Wishart; Laura A Flashman
Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.978

2.  Atlas-based hippocampus segmentation in Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment.

Authors:  Owen T Carmichael; Howard A Aizenstein; Simon W Davis; James T Becker; Paul M Thompson; Carolyn Cidis Meltzer; Yanxi Liu
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-10-01       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Simplified intersubject averaging on the cortical surface using SUMA.

Authors:  Brenna D Argall; Ziad S Saad; Michael S Beauchamp
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Hippocampus-specific fMRI group activation analysis using the continuous medial representation.

Authors:  Paul A Yushkevich; John A Detre; Dawn Mechanic-Hamilton; María A Fernández-Seara; Kathy Z Tang; Angela Hoang; Marc Korczykowski; Hui Zhang; James C Gee
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-02-22       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Validation of a fully automated hippocampal segmentation method on patients with dementia.

Authors:  Michael J Firbank; Robert Barber; Emma J Burton; John T O'Brien
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  FreeSurfer-initiated fully-automated subcortical brain segmentation in MRI using Large Deformation Diffeomorphic Metric Mapping.

Authors:  Ali R Khan; Lei Wang; Mirza Faisal Beg
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-03-26       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 7.  Automated methods for hippocampus segmentation: the evolution and a review of the state of the art.

Authors:  Vanderson Dill; Alexandre Rosa Franco; Márcio Sarroglia Pinho
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2015-04

8.  Nonlocal regularization for active appearance model: Application to medial temporal lobe segmentation.

Authors:  Shiyan Hu; Pierrick Coupé; Jens C Pruessner; D Louis Collins
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-09-15       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 9.  Defining the human hippocampus in cerebral magnetic resonance images--an overview of current segmentation protocols.

Authors:  C Konrad; T Ukas; C Nebel; V Arolt; A W Toga; K L Narr
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Automatic segmentation of the hippocampus and the amygdala driven by hybrid constraints: method and validation.

Authors:  M Chupin; A Hammers; R S N Liu; O Colliot; J Burdett; E Bardinet; J S Duncan; L Garnero; L Lemieux
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-02-21       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.