Literature DB >> 20454552

Comparison of Control Algorithms for a MEMS-based Adaptive Optics Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscope.

Kaccie Y Li1, Sandipan Mishra, Pavan Tiruveedhula, Austin Roorda.   

Abstract

We compared four algorithms for controlling a MEMS deformable mirror of an adaptive optics (AO) scanning laser ophthalmoscope. Interferometer measurements of the static nonlinear response of the deformable mirror were used to form an equivalent linear model of the AO system so that the classic integrator plus wavefront reconstructor type controller can be implemented. The algorithms differ only in the design of the wavefront reconstructor. The comparisons were made for two eyes (two individuals) via a series of imaging sessions. All four controllers performed similarly according to estimated residual wavefront error not reflecting the actual image quality observed. A metric based on mean image intensity did consistently reflect the qualitative observations of retinal image quality. Based on this metric, the controller most effective for suppressing the least significant modes of the deformable mirror performed the best.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 20454552      PMCID: PMC2865653          DOI: 10.1109/ACC.2009.5159832

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Am Control Conf        ISSN: 0743-1619


  13 in total

1.  Monochromatic aberrations of the human eye in a large population.

Authors:  J Porter; A Guirao; I G Cox; D R Williams
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.129

2.  Ocular wave-front aberration statistics in a normal young population.

Authors:  José Francisco Castejón-Mochón; Norberto López-Gil; Antonio Benito; Pablo Artal
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Theoretical modeling and evaluation of the axial resolution of the adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscope.

Authors:  Krishnakumar Venkateswaran; Austin Roorda; Fernando Romero-Borja
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.170

4.  Efficient computation of minimum-variance wave-front reconstructors with sparse matrix techniques.

Authors:  Brent L Ellerbroek
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.129

5.  Modeling, simulation, and open-loop control of a continuous facesheet MEMS deformable mirror.

Authors:  Curtis R Vogel; Qiang Yang
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.129

6.  MEMS-based adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscopy.

Authors:  Yuhua Zhang; Siddharth Poonja; Austin Roorda
Journal:  Opt Lett       Date:  2006-05-01       Impact factor: 3.776

7.  Performance of the Keck Observatory adaptive-optics system.

Authors:  Marcos A van Dam; David Le Mignant; Bruce A Macintosh
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  2004-10-10       Impact factor: 1.980

8.  Statistical description of wave-front aberration in the human eye.

Authors:  Manuel P Cagigal; Vidal F Canales; José F Castejón-Mochón; Pedro M Prieto; Norberto López-Gil; Pablo Artal
Journal:  Opt Lett       Date:  2002-01-01       Impact factor: 3.776

9.  Supernormal vision and high-resolution retinal imaging through adaptive optics.

Authors:  J Liang; D R Williams; D T Miller
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 2.129

10.  Human photoreceptor topography.

Authors:  C A Curcio; K R Sloan; R E Kalina; A E Hendrickson
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1990-02-22       Impact factor: 3.215

View more
  9 in total

1.  High-speed adaptive optics for imaging of the living human eye.

Authors:  Yongxin Yu; Tianjiao Zhang; Alexander Meadway; Xiaolin Wang; Yuhua Zhang
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 3.894

2.  Relationship between foveal cone structure and clinical measures of visual function in patients with inherited retinal degenerations.

Authors:  Kavitha Ratnam; Joseph Carroll; Travis C Porco; Jacque L Duncan; Austin Roorda
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Dual-thread parallel control strategy for ophthalmic adaptive optics.

Authors:  Yongxin Yu; Yuhua Zhang
Journal:  Chin Opt Lett       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.448

4.  Adaptive optics retinal imaging with automatic detection of the pupil and its boundary in real time using Shack-Hartmann images.

Authors:  Alberto de Castro; Lucie Sawides; Xiaofeng Qi; Stephen A Burns
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  2017-08-20       Impact factor: 1.980

5.  Adaptive optics for high-resolution imaging.

Authors:  Karen M Hampson; Raphaël Turcotte; Donald T Miller; Kazuhiro Kurokawa; Jared R Males; Na Ji; Martin J Booth
Journal:  Nat Rev Methods Primers       Date:  2021-10-14

6.  Adaptive optics ophthalmoscopy.

Authors:  Austin Roorda; Jacque L Duncan
Journal:  Annu Rev Vis Sci       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 6.422

7.  Intersubject variability of foveal cone photoreceptor density in relation to eye length.

Authors:  Kaccie Y Li; Pavan Tiruveedhula; Austin Roorda
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 4.925

8.  Observation of cone and rod photoreceptors in normal subjects and patients using a new generation adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscope.

Authors:  David Merino; Jacque L Duncan; Pavan Tiruveedhula; Austin Roorda
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2011-07-08       Impact factor: 3.732

9.  Imaging of Age-Related Macular Degeneration by Adaptive Optics Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscopy in Eyes With Aged Lenses or Intraocular Lenses.

Authors:  Yuhua Zhang; Xiaolin Wang; Mark E Clark; Christine A Curcio; Cynthia Owsley
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 3.283

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.