Literature DB >> 20453727

Clinical effectiveness of school screening for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a large population-based retrospective cohort study.

Keith D K Luk1, C F Lee, Kenneth M C Cheung, Jack C Y Cheng, Bobby K W Ng, T P Lam, K H Mak, Paul S F Yip, Daniel Y T Fong.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of school scoliosis screening using a large and long-term-followed cohort of students in Hong Kong. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: School screening for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis has been criticized as resulting in over-referrals for radiography and having low predictive values. Indeed, all but one previous retrospective cohort studies had no follow-up assessments of students until their skeletal maturity, leaving any late-developed curves undetected. The one study that completed this follow-up was well conducted but had low precisions due to its small sample size.
METHODS: A total of 157,444 students were eligible for a biennial scoliosis screening, and their screening results and medical records up to 19 years of age were available. Students first had forward bending test and angle of trunk rotation (ATR) performed. Those with ATR between 5 degrees and 14 degrees or signs of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis were assessed by moiré topography regularly. Students with an ATR >or=15 degrees , >or=2 moiré lines, or significant clinical signs were referred for radiography and had their Cobb angle measured.
RESULTS: Of the 115,190 screened students in the cohort, 3228 (2.8%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.7%-2.9%) were referred for radiography. At the final follow-up, the positive predictive values were 43.6% (41.8%-45.3%) for a Cobb angle >or=20 degrees and 9.4% (8.4%-10.5%) for needing treatment, while the sensitivities were 88.1% (86.4%-89.6%) and 80.0% (75.6%-83.9%), respectively.
CONCLUSION: This is the largest study that has demonstrated that school scoliosis screening in Hong Kong is predictive and sensitive with a low referral rate. Screening should thus be continued in order to facilitate early administration of conservative treatments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20453727     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181c7cb8c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  34 in total

1.  Does School Screening Affect Scoliosis Curve Magnitude at Presentation to a Pediatric Orthopedic Clinic?

Authors:  Joshua J Thomas; Anthony A Stans; Todd A Milbrandt; Vickie M Treder; Hilal Maradit Kremers; William J Shaughnessy; A Noelle Larson
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2018 Jul - Aug

2.  Pelvic tilt and trunk inclination: new predictive factors in curve progression during the Milwaukee bracing for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Jing Guo; Zhen Liu; Feng Lv; Zezhang Zhu; Bangping Qian; Xing Zhang; Xiaolong Lin; Xu Sun; Yong Qiu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Are there gender differences in sagittal spinal pelvic inclination before and after the adolescent pubertal growth spurt?

Authors:  Weijun Wang; Zhiwei Wang; Zhen Liu; Zezhang Zhu; Feng Zhu; Xu Sun; Tsz Ping Lam; Jack Chun-yiu Cheng; Yong Qiu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-09-13       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Effect of whole body vibration (WBV) therapy on bone density and bone quality in osteopenic girls with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  T P Lam; B K W Ng; L W H Cheung; K M Lee; L Qin; J C Y Cheng
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Gender differences in degenerative lumbar scoliosis spine flexibilities.

Authors:  Jie Zheng; Boyle Cheng; Daniel Cook; Yonghong Yang
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 4.060

6.  Prevalence and determinants of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis from school screening in Huangpu district, Shanghai, China.

Authors:  Miao Hu; Zheng Zhang; Xin Zhou; Rui Gao; Ce Wang; Jun Ma; Yichen Meng; Xuhui Zhou
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 3.940

Review 7.  Epidemiology of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Markus Rafael Konieczny; Hüsseyin Senyurt; Rüdiger Krauspe
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 1.548

8.  The role of 22q11.2 deletion syndrome in the relationship between congenital heart disease and scoliosis.

Authors:  Jelle F Homans; Steven de Reuver; Tracy Heung; Candice K Silversides; Erwin N Oechslin; Michiel L Houben; Donna M McDonald-McGinn; Moyo C Kruyt; René M Castelein; Anne S Bassett
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2020-01-18       Impact factor: 4.166

9.  A prospective randomized controlled study on the treatment outcome of SpineCor brace versus rigid brace for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with follow-up according to the SRS standardized criteria.

Authors:  Jing Guo; Tsz Ping Lam; Man Sang Wong; Bobby Kin Wah Ng; Kwong Man Lee; King Lok Liu; Lik Hang Hung; Ajax Hong Yin Lau; Sai Wing Sin; Wing Kwan Kwok; Fiona Wai Ping Yu; Yong Qiu; Jack Chun Yiu Cheng
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 10.  2016 SOSORT guidelines: orthopaedic and rehabilitation treatment of idiopathic scoliosis during growth.

Authors:  Stefano Negrini; Sabrina Donzelli; Angelo Gabriele Aulisa; Dariusz Czaprowski; Sanja Schreiber; Jean Claude de Mauroy; Helmut Diers; Theodoros B Grivas; Patrick Knott; Tomasz Kotwicki; Andrea Lebel; Cindy Marti; Toru Maruyama; Joe O'Brien; Nigel Price; Eric Parent; Manuel Rigo; Michele Romano; Luke Stikeleather; James Wynne; Fabio Zaina
Journal:  Scoliosis Spinal Disord       Date:  2018-01-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.