Literature DB >> 20452740

The accuracy of digital infrared imaging for breast cancer detection in women undergoing breast biopsy.

G C Wishart1, M Campisi, M Boswell, D Chapman, V Shackleton, S Iddles, A Hallett, P D Britton.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mammography has a lower sensitivity for breast cancer detection in younger women and those with dense breasts. Recent improvements in digital infrared breast imaging suggest there may be a role for this technology and we have studied its performance in 100 women prior to breast needle core biopsy (CB).
METHODS: All patients were imaged using a digital infrared breast (DIB) scan (Sentinel BreastScan) prior to breast biopsy. Analysis of the infrared scans was performed, blinded to biopsy results, in four different ways: Sentinel screening report, Sentinel artificial intelligence (neural network), expert manual review and NoTouch BreastScan a novel artificial intelligence programme.
RESULTS: Of 106 biopsies performed in 100 women, 65 were malignant and 41 were benign. Sensitivity of Sentinel screening (53%) and Sentinel neural network (48%) was low but analysis with NoTouch software (70%) was much closer to expert manual review (78%). Sensitivity (78%) and specificity (75%) using NoTouch BreastScan were higher in women under 50 and the combination of mammography and DIB, with NoTouch interpretation, in this age group resulted in a sensitivity of 89%.
CONCLUSION: DIB using NoTouch is an effective adjunctive test for breast cancer detection in women under 70 and appears to be particularly effective in women under 50 where maximal sensitivity (78%) and specificity (75%) were observed. The combined sensitivity of NoTouch BreastScan and mammography in women under 50 was encouraging at 89%, suggesting a potential way forward for a dual imaging approach in this younger age group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20452740     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2010.04.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0748-7983            Impact factor:   4.424


  20 in total

1.  Digital infrared breast scan shows promise for detecting cancer.

Authors:  Lisa Hutchinson
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 66.675

2.  Accuracy and Reliability of Infrared Thermography in Assessment of the Breasts of Women Affected by Cancer.

Authors:  Rinaldo Roberto de Jesus Guirro; Maíta Marade Oliveira Lima Leite Vaz; Lais Mara Siqueira das Neves; Almir Vieira Dibai-Filho; Hélio Humberto Angotti Carrara; Elaine Caldeira de Oliveira Guirro
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 4.460

3.  Contact-free monitoring of circulation and perfusion dynamics based on the analysis of thermal imagery.

Authors:  Carina Barbosa Pereira; Michael Czaplik; Nikolai Blanik; Rolf Rossaint; Vladimir Blazek; Steffen Leonhardt
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 3.732

4.  Estrogen Receptor Status and the Future Burden of Invasive and In Situ Breast Cancers in the United States.

Authors:  Philip S Rosenberg; Kimberly A Barker; William F Anderson
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Comparison of the Accuracy of Thermography and Mammography in the Detection of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Ramesh Omranipour; Ali Kazemian; Sadaf Alipour; Masoume Najafi; Mansour Alidoosti; Mitra Navid; Afsaneh Alikhassi; Nasrin Ahmadinejad; Khojasteh Bagheri; Shahrzad Izadi
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 2.860

6.  Detection of breast abnormality from thermograms using curvelet transform based feature extraction.

Authors:  Sheeja V Francis; M Sasikala; S Saranya
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2014-03-23       Impact factor: 4.460

7.  [Diagnostic test for detection of cervical lymph node metastasis from oral squamous cell carcinoma via infrared thermal imaging].

Authors:  C Sb Tao; F Dong; D C Wang; C B Guo
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2019-10-18

8.  Evolution of Skin Temperature after the Application of Compressive Forces on Tendon, Muscle and Myofascial Trigger Point.

Authors:  Marina Figueiredo Magalhães; Almir Vieira Dibai-Filho; Elaine Caldeira de Oliveira Guirro; Carlos Eduardo Girasol; Alessandra Kelly de Oliveira; Fabiana Rodrigues Cancio Dias; Rinaldo Roberto de Jesus Guirro
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Assessment of the Sensitivity, Specificity, and Accuracy of Thermography in Identifying Patients with TMD.

Authors:  Krzysztof Woźniak; Liliana Szyszka-Sommerfeld; Grzegorz Trybek; Dagmara Piątkowska
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2015-05-23

10.  Evaluation of the diagnostic power of thermography in breast cancer using Bayesian network classifiers.

Authors:  Cruz-Ramírez Nicandro; Mezura-Montes Efrén; Ameca-Alducin María Yaneli; Martín-Del-Campo-Mena Enrique; Acosta-Mesa Héctor Gabriel; Pérez-Castro Nancy; Guerra-Hernández Alejandro; Hoyos-Rivera Guillermo de Jesús; Barrientos-Martínez Rocío Erandi
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 2.238

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.